314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29492903)
1. Accounting for Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare-Related Discrete Choice Experiments when Comparing Stated Preferences: A Systematic Review.
Wright SJ; Vass CM; Sim G; Burton M; Fiebig DG; Payne K
Patient; 2018 Oct; 11(5):475-488. PubMed ID: 29492903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare Discrete Choice Experiments: A Primer.
Vass CM; Wright S; Burton M; Payne K
Patient; 2018 Apr; 11(2):167-173. PubMed ID: 29032437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
Harrison M; Milbers K; Hudson M; Bansback N
BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e014719. PubMed ID: 28515194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preferences for aspects of antenatal and newborn screening: a systematic review.
Vass CM; Georgsson S; Ulph F; Payne K
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Apr; 19(1):131. PubMed ID: 30991967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are Healthcare Choices Predictable? The Impact of Discrete Choice Experiment Designs and Models.
de Bekker-Grob EW; Swait JD; Kassahun HT; Bliemer MCJ; Jonker MF; Veldwijk J; Cong K; Rose JM; Donkers B
Value Health; 2019 Sep; 22(9):1050-1062. PubMed ID: 31511182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Current Practices for Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Health-Related Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review.
Karim S; Craig BM; Vass C; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM
Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Oct; 40(10):943-956. PubMed ID: 35960434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Discrete-Choice Experiments: An ISPOR Special Interest Group Report.
Vass C; Boeri M; Karim S; Marshall D; Craig B; Ho KA; Mott D; Ngorsuraches S; Badawy SM; Mühlbacher A; Gonzalez JM; Heidenreich S
Value Health; 2022 May; 25(5):685-694. PubMed ID: 35500943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk as an attribute in discrete choice experiments: a systematic review of the literature.
Harrison M; Rigby D; Vass C; Flynn T; Louviere J; Payne K
Patient; 2014; 7(2):151-70. PubMed ID: 24566923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discrete choice experiments in pharmacy: a review of the literature.
Naik-Panvelkar P; Armour C; Saini B
Int J Pharm Pract; 2013 Feb; 21(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 23301529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of discrete choice experiments to enhance stakeholder engagement as a strategy for advancing implementation: a systematic review.
Salloum RG; Shenkman EA; Louviere JJ; Chambers DA
Implement Sci; 2017 Nov; 12(1):140. PubMed ID: 29169397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The application of discrete choice experiments eliciting young peoples' preferences for healthcare: a systematic literature review.
Williams G; Kinchin I
Eur J Health Econ; 2023 Aug; 24(6):987-998. PubMed ID: 36169764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can healthcare choice be predicted using stated preference data?
de Bekker-Grob EW; Donkers B; Bliemer MCJ; Veldwijk J; Swait JD
Soc Sci Med; 2020 Feb; 246():112736. PubMed ID: 31887626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A closer look at decision and analyst error by including nonlinearities in discrete choice models: implications on willingness-to-pay estimates derived from discrete choice data in healthcare.
de Bekker-Grob EW; Rose JM; Bliemer MC
Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Dec; 31(12):1169-83. PubMed ID: 24178372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methods for Conducting Stated Preference Research with Children and Adolescents in Health: A Scoping Review of the Application of Discrete Choice Experiments.
Michaels-Igbokwe C; Currie GR; Kennedy BL; MacDonald KV; Marshall DA
Patient; 2021 Nov; 14(6):741-758. PubMed ID: 34008164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stakeholders' preferences for the design and delivery of virtual care services: A systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
Vo LK; Allen MJ; Cunich M; Thillainadesan J; McPhail SM; Sharma P; Wallis S; McGowan K; Carter HE
Soc Sci Med; 2024 Jan; 340():116459. PubMed ID: 38048738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using blocked fractional factorial designs to construct discrete choice experiments for healthcare studies.
Jaynes J; Wong WK; Xu H
Stat Med; 2016 Jul; 35(15):2543-60. PubMed ID: 26823156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methods to Summarize Discrete-Choice Experiments in a Systematic Review: A Scoping Review.
Choudhary D; Thomas M; Pacheco-Barrios K; Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Schünemann H; Hazlewood G
Patient; 2022 Nov; 15(6):629-639. PubMed ID: 35829927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analysis on Genetic Testing.
Ozdemir S; Lee JJ; Chaudhry I; Ocampo RRQ
Patient; 2022 Jan; 15(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 34085205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using decision mapping to inform the development of a stated choice survey to elicit youth preferences for sexual and reproductive health and HIV services in rural Malawi.
Michaels-Igbokwe C; Lagarde M; Cairns J; Terris-Prestholt F
Soc Sci Med; 2014 Mar; 105():93-102. PubMed ID: 24509049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
