132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29493079)
1. Validating k
Grzetic S; Ayan AS; Woollard J; Gupta N
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):351-354. PubMed ID: 29493079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
Tailor RC; Hanson WF
Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A dosimetric evaluation of the IAEA-AAPM TRS483 code of practice for dosimetry of small static fields used in conventional linac beams and comparison with IAEA TRS-398, AAPM TG51, and TG51 Addendum protocols.
Huq MS; Hwang MS; Teo TP; Jang SY; Heron DE; Lalonde RJ
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 30009526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Measurement of peak correction factor of Farmer chamber for calibration of flattening filter free (FFF) clinical photon beams].
Kontra G; Major T; Polgár C
Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 26035159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantification of the role of lead foil in flattening filter free beam reference dosimetry.
Gao S; Nelson C; Wang C; Kathriarachchi V; Choi M; Saxena R; Kendall R; Balter P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 24(4):e13960. PubMed ID: 36913192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. kQ factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in clinical proton beams.
Vatnitsky SM; Siebers JV; Miller DW
Med Phys; 1996 Jan; 23(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8700030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Calibration of high-energy photon and electron beams for radiotherapy using AAPM 1983 and IAEA 1987 dosimetry protocols.
Huq MS; Agostinelli AG; Nath R
Med Phys; 1993; 20(2 Pt 1):293-8. PubMed ID: 8497213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new approach to electron-beam reference dosimetry.
Rogers DW
Med Phys; 1998 Mar; 25(3):310-20. PubMed ID: 9547498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Photonuclear dose calculations for high-energy photon beams from Siemens and Varian linacs.
Chibani O; Ma CM
Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):1990-2000. PubMed ID: 12945965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Absorbed-dose beam quality conversion factors for cylindrical chambers in high energy photon beams.
Seuntjens JP; Ross CK; Shortt KR; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 2000 Dec; 27(12):2763-79. PubMed ID: 11190960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental determination of beam quality factors, kQ, for two types of Farmer chamber in a 10 MV photon and a 175 MeV proton beam.
Medin J; Ross CK; Klassen NV; Palmans H; Grusell E; Grindborg JE
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1503-21. PubMed ID: 16510959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of a 2.5 MV inline portal imaging beam.
Gräfe JL; Owen J; Eduardo Villarreal-Barajas J; Khan RF
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):222-234. PubMed ID: 27685135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo calculations of kQ, the beam quality conversion factor.
Muir BR; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5939-50. PubMed ID: 21158307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Monte Carlo correction factors for a Farmer 0.6 cm3 ion chamber dose measurement in the build-up region of the 6 MV clinical beam.
Pena J; Sánchez-Doblado F; Capote R; Terrón JA; Gómez F
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1523-32. PubMed ID: 16510960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Absorbed dose measurement of photon beam with Farmer-type ionization chambers in Japanese dosimetry protocols].
Fujisaki T; Hiraoka T; Osawa A; Nakajima M; Kuwabara A; Yokoyama K; Saitoh H; Tomaru T; Inada T
Igaku Butsuri; 2004; 24(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 15226645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recommendations for clinical electron beam dosimetry: supplement to the recommendations of Task Group 25.
Gerbi BJ; Antolak JA; Deibel FC; Followill DS; Herman MG; Higgins PD; Huq MS; Mihailidis DN; Yorke ED; Hogstrom KR; Khan FM
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3239-79. PubMed ID: 19673223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between TG-51 and TG-21: Calibration of photon and electron beams in water using cylindrical chambers.
Cho SH; Lowenstein JR; Balter PA; Wells NH; Hanson WF
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2000; 1(3):108-15. PubMed ID: 11674825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
Saiful Huq M; Andreo P
Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11213922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A round-robin gamma stereotactic radiosurgery dosimetry interinstitution comparison of calibration protocols.
Drzymala RE; Alvarez PE; Bednarz G; Bourland JD; DeWerd LA; Ma L; Meltsner SG; Neyman G; Novotny J; Petti PL; Rivard MJ; Shiu AS; Goetsch SJ
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6745-56. PubMed ID: 26520764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
