255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29493522)
1. Operative Versus Non-operative Treatment of Grade III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations and the Use of SurgiLig: a Retrospective Review.
Younis F; Ajwani S; Bibi A; Riley E; Hughes PJ
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2017 Dec; 19(6):523-530. PubMed ID: 29493522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint injuries: quality of life comparison between patients managed operatively with a hook plate versus patients managed non-operatively.
Natera Cisneros LG; Sarasquete Reiriz J
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2017 Apr; 27(3):341-350. PubMed ID: 27734220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modified Weaver-Dunn procedure versus the use of a synthetic ligament for acromioclavicular joint reconstruction.
Kumar V; Garg S; Elzein I; Lawrence T; Manning P; Wallace WA
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2014 Aug; 22(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 25163955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of Tension Banding and Modified Orthocord Sling in Acromioclavicular Dislocation Treatment - Non-Randomized Retrospective Study].
Trávník J; Kovařík J; Pavlacký T; Veselý R; Pink T; Paša L
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2019; 86(2):131-135. PubMed ID: 31070572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conversion to anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) shows similar clinical outcomes compared to successful non-operative treatment in chronic primary type III to V acromioclavicular joint injuries.
Muench LN; Berthold DP; Uyeki C; Kia C; Cote MP; Imhoff AB; Beitzel K; Corona K; Mazzocca AD; Cerciello S
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Jul; 29(7):2264-2271. PubMed ID: 32710143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Operative treatment of acute acromioclavicular dislocations Rockwood III and V-Comparative study between K-wires combined with FiberTape(®) vs. TightRope System(®).
Vrgoč G; Japjec M; Jurina P; Gulan G; Janković S; Šebečić B; Starešinić M
Injury; 2015 Nov; 46 Suppl 6():S107-12. PubMed ID: 26584732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Consistency of long-term outcome of acute Rockwood grade III acromioclavicular joint separations after K-wire transfixation.
Leidel BA; Braunstein V; Kirchhoff C; Pilotto S; Mutschler W; Biberthaler P
J Trauma; 2009 Jun; 66(6):1666-71. PubMed ID: 19509629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison of therapeutic effects of two internal fixations for the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation of Allman Grade III].
Guo JB; Zhao YM
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2009 Sep; 22(9):650-2. PubMed ID: 19817189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction with the LARS ligament in professional versus non-professional athletes.
Marcheggiani Muccioli GM; Manning C; Wright P; Grassi A; Zaffagnini S; Funk L
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Jun; 24(6):1961-7. PubMed ID: 25149645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Case-control study on measurement of coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligament injuries during internal fixation operation for the treatment of fresh acromioclavicular joint dislocation of Tossy type III].
Guan TJ; Sun P; Zheng LG; Qi XY
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2014 Jan; 27(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 24754137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Midshaft clavicle fractures with associated ipsilateral acromioclavicular joint dislocations: Incidence and risk factors.
Ottomeyer C; Taylor BC; Isaacson M; Martinez L; Ebaugh P; French BG
Injury; 2017 Feb; 48(2):469-473. PubMed ID: 28062098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Percutaneous double-button fixation method for treatment of acute type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation.
Acar MA; Güleç A; Erkoçak ÖF; Yılmaz G; Durgut F; Elmadağ M
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2015; 49(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 26200401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Arthroscopic stabilisation of acute acromioclavicular dislocation using the TighRope device].
Bajnar L; Bartoš R; Sedivý P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2013; 80(6):386-90. PubMed ID: 24750965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Semitendinosus tendon graft versus a modified Weaver-Dunn procedure for acromioclavicular joint reconstruction in chronic cases: a prospective comparative study.
Tauber M; Gordon K; Koller H; Fox M; Resch H
Am J Sports Med; 2009 Jan; 37(1):181-90. PubMed ID: 18818433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing mini-open and arthroscopic acromioclavicular joint repair: functional results and return to sport.
Faggiani M; Vasario GP; Mattei L; Calò MJ; Castoldi F
Musculoskelet Surg; 2016 Dec; 100(3):187-191. PubMed ID: 27287544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. General Health Status After Nonoperative Versus Operative Treatment for Acute, Complete Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.
Mah JM;
J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Sep; 31(9):485-490. PubMed ID: 28832388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acute grade III and IV acromioclavicular dislocations: outcomes and pitfalls of reconstruction procedures using a synthetic ligament.
Mares O; Luneau S; Staquet V; Beltrand E; Bousquet PJ; Maynou C
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 Nov; 96(7):721-6. PubMed ID: 20863777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment of grade III acromioclavicular separations. Operative versus nonoperative management.
Press J; Zuckerman JD; Gallagher M; Cuomo F
Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 1997; 56(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 9220095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acute high-grade acromioclavicular dislocations treated with triple button device (MINAR): Preliminary results.
Cano-Martínez JA; Nicolás-Serrano G; Bento-Gerard J; Picazo-Marín F; Andrés-Grau J
Injury; 2016 Nov; 47(11):2512-2519. PubMed ID: 27663286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is conservative treatment still defensible in grade III acromioclavicular dislocation? Are there predictive factors of poor outcome?
Rasmont Q; Delloye C; Bigare E; Van Isacker T
Acta Orthop Belg; 2015 Mar; 81(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 26280863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
