These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

443 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29494200)

  • 41. Mortality Salience, System Justification, and Candidate Evaluations in the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Sterling J; Jost JT; Shrout PE
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150556. PubMed ID: 26982197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Daily experiences and well-being: do memories of events matter?
    Tov W
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(8):1371-89. PubMed ID: 22647035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Ethics Versus Success? The Acceptance of Unethical Leadership in the 2016 US Presidential Elections.
    Morais C; Abrams D; Randsley de Moura G
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():3089. PubMed ID: 32038430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The religion paradox: if religion makes people happy, why are so many dropping out?
    Diener E; Tay L; Myers DG
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Dec; 101(6):1278-90. PubMed ID: 21806304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Assaults on Days of Campaign Rallies During the 2016 US Presidential Election.
    Morrison CN; Ukert B; Palumbo A; Dong B; Jacoby SF; Wiebe DJ
    Epidemiology; 2018 Jul; 29(4):490-493. PubMed ID: 29543668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Motivated reasoning: Election integrity beliefs, outcome acceptance, and polarization before, during, and after the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Vail KE; Harvell-Bowman L; Lockett M; Pyszczynski T; Gilmore G
    Motiv Emot; 2023; 47(2):177-192. PubMed ID: 36188156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Fragility of happiness moderates the influence of negative predictors of subjective well-Being.
    Joshanloo M
    Anxiety Stress Coping; 2018 Mar; 31(2):222-227. PubMed ID: 29298493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The objectivity illusion and voter polarization in the 2016 presidential election.
    Schwalbe MC; Cohen GL; Ross LD
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Sep; 117(35):21218-21229. PubMed ID: 32817537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Should Biden Apologize for Trump? National Remorse and the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Smith N
    Society; 2020; 57(6):698-703. PubMed ID: 33424058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The Relative Importance of Personality, Financial Satisfaction, and Autonomy for Different Subjective Well-Being Facets.
    Ng W; Russell Kua WS; Kang SH
    J Psychol; 2019; 153(7):680-700. PubMed ID: 31002585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. They Saw a Debate: Political Polarization Is Associated with Greater Multivariate Neural Synchrony When Viewing the Opposing Candidate Speak.
    Broom TW; Stahl JL; Ping EEC; Wagner DD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Dec; 35(1):60-73. PubMed ID: 35802592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Re-examining the spread of moralized rhetoric from political elites: Effects of valence and ideology.
    Wang SN; Inbar Y
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Dec; 151(12):3292-3303. PubMed ID: 35727315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Determinants of subjective well-being in representative samples of nations.
    Ngamaba KH
    Eur J Public Health; 2017 Apr; 27(2):377-382. PubMed ID: 27426951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. #Election2020: the first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election.
    Chen E; Deb A; Ferrara E
    J Comput Soc Sci; 2022; 5(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 33824934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Using "Big Data" Versus Alternative Measures of Aggregate Data to Predict the U.S. 2016 Presidential Election.
    Ma-Kellams C; Bishop B; Zhang MF; Villagrana B
    Psychol Rep; 2018 Aug; 121(4):726-735. PubMed ID: 29298630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Postelection stress: Symptoms, relationships, and counseling service utilization in clients before and after the 2016 U.S. national election.
    McCarthy KS; Saks JV
    J Couns Psychol; 2019 Nov; 66(6):726-735. PubMed ID: 31368721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Linking health states to subjective well-being: an empirical study of 5854 rural residents in China.
    Wang X; Jia X; Zhu M; Chen J
    Public Health; 2015 Jun; 129(6):655-66. PubMed ID: 25931439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Living among the affluent: boon or bane?
    Tay L; Morrison M; Diener E
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Jun; 25(6):1235-41. PubMed ID: 24756767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Elite rhetoric can undermine democratic norms.
    Clayton K; Davis NT; Nyhan B; Porter E; Ryan TJ; Wood TJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jun; 118(23):. PubMed ID: 34078668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Politics is making us sick: The negative impact of political engagement on public health during the Trump administration.
    Smith KB
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262022. PubMed ID: 35030195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.