These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Comparability effects in probability judgments. Pleskac TJ Psychol Sci; 2012 Aug; 23(8):848-54. PubMed ID: 22825358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biased decision-making: developing an understanding of how positive and negative relationships may skew judgments. Mills CM; Grant MG Dev Sci; 2009 Sep; 12(5):784-97. PubMed ID: 19702770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Making Retrospective Confidence Judgments Improves Learners' Ability to Decide What Not to Study. Robey AM; Dougherty MR; Buttaccio DR Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 28934588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative judgments with missing information: a regression and process tracing analysis. Körner C; Gertzen H; Bettinger C; Albert D Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 May; 125(1):66-84. PubMed ID: 16949538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Daily horizons: evidence of narrow bracketing in judgment from 10 years of M.B.A. admissions interviews. Simonsohn U; Gino F Psychol Sci; 2013 Feb; 24(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 23307942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How target-lure similarity shapes confidence judgments in multiple-alternative decision tasks. Horry R; Brewer N J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Dec; 145(12):1615-1634. PubMed ID: 27736136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simultaneous perceptual and response biases on sequential face attractiveness judgments. Pegors TK; Mattar MG; Bryan PB; Epstein RA J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Jun; 144(3):664-73. PubMed ID: 25867223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Judging the judges' performance in rhythmic gymnastics. Flessas K; Mylonas D; Panagiotaropoulou G; Tsopani D; Korda A; Siettos C; Di Cagno A; Evdokimidis I; Smyrnis N Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Mar; 47(3):640-8. PubMed ID: 24977695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought. Clore GL; Huntsinger JR Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Sep; 11(9):393-9. PubMed ID: 17698405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Save the last dance for me: unwanted serial position effects in jury evaluations. Bruine de Bruin W Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Mar; 118(3):245-60. PubMed ID: 15698823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Overrepresentation of extreme events in decision making reflects rational use of cognitive resources. Lieder F; Griffiths TL; Hsu M Psychol Rev; 2018 Jan; 125(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 29035078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of evidence reliability on sensitivity and bias in decision confidence. Boldt A; de Gardelle V; Yeung N J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1520-1531. PubMed ID: 28383959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Judging judges: How do children weigh the importance of capability and objectivity for being a good decision maker? Mills CM; Landrum AR Br J Dev Psychol; 2012 Sep; 30(Pt 3):393-414. PubMed ID: 22882370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Alter AL; Oppenheimer DM Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2009 Aug; 13(3):219-35. PubMed ID: 19638628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fluent, fast, and frugal? A formal model evaluation of the interplay between memory, fluency, and comparative judgments. Hilbig BE; Erdfelder E; Pohl RF J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):827-39. PubMed ID: 21355665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identifying the bad guy in a lineup using confidence judgments under deadline pressure. Brewer N; Weber N; Wootton D; Lindsay DS Psychol Sci; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1208-14. PubMed ID: 22933457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Too much experience: a desensitization bias in emotional perspective taking. Campbell T; O'Brien E; Van Boven L; Schwarz N; Ubel P J Pers Soc Psychol; 2014 Feb; 106(2):272-85. PubMed ID: 24467422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]