180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29495705)
1. Modulation detection interference in cochlear implant listeners under forward masking conditions.
Chatterjee M; Kulkarni AM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Feb; 143(2):1117. PubMed ID: 29495705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Forward masking patterns by low and high-rate stimulation in cochlear implant users: Differences in masking effectiveness and spread of neural excitation.
Zhou N; Dong L; Dixon S
Hear Res; 2020 Apr; 389():107921. PubMed ID: 32097828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychoacoustic and electrophysiological electric-acoustic interaction effects in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
Imsiecke M; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 386():107873. PubMed ID: 31884220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Across- and within-channel envelope interactions in cochlear implant listeners.
Chatterjee M; Oba SI
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Dec; 5(4):360-75. PubMed ID: 15675001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
Gifford RH; Stecker GC
Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers: Effects of masker-probe delay for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Svec A; Dubno JR; Nelson PB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):1195-203. PubMed ID: 27036255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changing stimulation patterns can change the broadness of contralateral masking functions for bilateral cochlear implant users.
Lee DH; Aronoff JM
Hear Res; 2018 Jun; 363():55-61. PubMed ID: 29548706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Place specificity measured in forward and interleaved masking in cochlear implants.
Azadpour M; AlJasser A; McKay CM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):EL314-20. PubMed ID: 24116536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adaptation to noise in amplitude modulation detection without the medial olivocochlear reflex.
Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Fumero MJ; Gorospe JM; Polo R; Gutiérrez Revilla A; Lopez-Poveda EA
Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():133-141. PubMed ID: 30933705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences in the temporal course of interaural time difference sensitivity between acoustic and electric hearing in amplitude modulated stimuli.
Hu H; Ewert SD; McAlpine D; Dietz M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1862. PubMed ID: 28372072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modulation detection interference in cochlear implant subjects.
Richardson LM; Busby PA; Clark GM
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jul; 104(1):442-52. PubMed ID: 9670536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comodulation masking release induced by controlled electrical stimulation of auditory nerve fibers.
Zirn S; Hempel JM; Schuster M; Hemmert W
Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():60-6. PubMed ID: 23220120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adult Listeners: Speech-On-Speech Masking and Multitalker Localization.
Rana B; Buchholz JM; Morgan C; Sharma M; Weller T; Konganda SA; Shirai K; Kawano A
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517722106. PubMed ID: 28752811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners depends on stimulation mode, level, and electrode location.
Chatterjee M; Kulkarni AM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3190. PubMed ID: 28682084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating multipulse integration as a neural-health correlate in human cochlear-implant users: Relationship to forward-masking recovery.
Zhou N; Pfingst BE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):EL70-5. PubMed ID: 27036290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Binaural unmasking with multiple adjacent masking electrodes in bilateral cochlear implant users.
Lu T; Litovsky R; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3934-45. PubMed ID: 21682415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
