184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2949574)
1. Comparison of the classification ability of the electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram.
Willems JL; Lesaffre E; Pardaens J
Am J Cardiol; 1987 Jan; 59(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 2949574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of multigroup logistic and linear discriminant ECG and VCG classification.
Willems JL; Lesaffre E
J Electrocardiol; 1987 Apr; 20(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 2955068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combination of diagnostic classifications from ECG and VCG computer interpretations.
van Bemmel JH; Kors JA; van Herpen G
J Electrocardiol; 1992; 25 Suppl():126-30. PubMed ID: 1297678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lack of superiority of the vectorcardiogram over the electrocardiogram in detecting inferior wall myocardial infarction regardless of time since infarction.
Lui CY; Ornato JP; Buell JC; Grissom RL; Erickson CC
J Electrocardiol; 1987 Jul; 20(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 3655595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vectorcardiogram more sensitive than 12-lead ECG in the detection of inferior myocardial infarction.
Edenbrandt L; Pahlm O; Lyttkens K; Albrechtsson U
Clin Physiol; 1990 Nov; 10(6):551-9. PubMed ID: 2083483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic value of electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram in postinfarction ventricular asynergy.
Piccolo E; Delise P; Trevi G; DiPede F; Allibardi P; Sheiban I; Reale A; Martuscelli E
J Electrocardiol; 1984 Apr; 17(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 6736840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative accuracy of electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic criteria for inferior myocardial infarction.
Hurd HP; Starling MR; Crawford MH; Dlabal PW; O'Rourke RA
Circulation; 1981 May; 63(5):1025-9. PubMed ID: 7471360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improvement of automated electrocardiographic diagnosis by combination of computer interpretations of the electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram.
Kors JA; van Herpen G; Willems JL; van Bemmel JH
Am J Cardiol; 1992 Jul; 70(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 1615877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram for the diagnosis of left atrial enlargement.
Benchimol A; Reich F; Desser KB
J Electrocardiol; 1976; 9(3):215-8. PubMed ID: 133196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrocardiographic poor R wave progression. I: correlation with the Frank vectorcardiogram.
Zema MJ; Kligfield P
J Electrocardiol; 1979 Jan; 12(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 154543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relation of left ventricular contractile patterns in coronary artery disease to the electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram.
Hilsenrath J; Tabrah F; Hamby RI; Hoffman I
J Electrocardiol; 1975; 8(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 1176843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of optimal scalar electrocardiographic, orthogonal electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic criteria for diagnosing inferior and anterior myocardial infarction.
Hill NE; Warner RA; Mookherjee S; Smulyan H
Am J Cardiol; 1984 Aug; 54(3):274-6. PubMed ID: 6465004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic vectorcardiography for early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction compared with 12-lead electrocardiogram. BIOMACS Study Group.
Gustafsson G; Dellborg M; Lindahl B; Wallentin L
Coron Artery Dis; 1996 Dec; 7(12):871-6. PubMed ID: 9116929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of the computer-reported vectorcardiogram on the cardiologist interpreter of the scalar electrocardiogram.
Milliken JA; Burggraf GW; McCans JL
J Electrocardiol; 1977; 10(4):375-8. PubMed ID: 144173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy by ECG and VCG in patients with inferior and posterior myocardial infarction. A comparison with echocardiographic data.
Loperfido F; Digaetano A; Guccione P; Desantis F; Vigna C; Laurenzi F; Solfanelli N; Ferrazza A; Pennestri F; Manzoli U
J Electrocardiol; 1986 Jul; 19(3):247-56. PubMed ID: 2943847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. XYZ data interpreted by a 12-lead computer program using the derived electrocardiogram.
Dower GE; Machado HB
J Electrocardiol; 1979 Jul; 12(3):249-61. PubMed ID: 89179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Left atrial size in childhood.
Biancaniello TM; Bisset GS; Gaum WE; Meyer RA; Kaplan S
J Electrocardiol; 1980; 13(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 6444657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of discrepancies between VCG and ECG interpretation of anterior wall myocardial infarction.
Yamauchi K; Segal M; Tatematsu H; Simonson E
J Electrocardiol; 1977 Apr; 10(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 858977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Derivation of the 12-lead electrocardiogram and 3-lead vectorcardiogram.
Schreck DM; Fishberg RD
Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Aug; 31(8):1183-90. PubMed ID: 23810076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of ECG interpretation results obtained by computer and cardiologists.
Willems JL; Abreu-Lima C; Arnaud P; Brohet CR; Denis B; Gehring J; Graham I; van Herpen G; Machado H; Michaelis J
Methods Inf Med; 1990 Sep; 29(4):308-16. PubMed ID: 2233377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
