130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29496200)
21. A multi-institutional survey of critical diagnoses (critical values) in surgical pathology and cytology.
Pereira TC; Silverman JF; LiVolsi V; Fletcher CD; Frable WJ; Goldblum JR; Swanson PE
Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Nov; 130(5):731-5. PubMed ID: 18854265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Discordance in the histopathologic diagnosis of melanoma at a melanoma referral center.
Shoo BA; Sagebiel RW; Kashani-Sabet M
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 May; 62(5):751-6. PubMed ID: 20303612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Collaboration of general practitioners and exercise providers in promotion of physical activity a written survey among general practitioners.
Leemrijse CJ; de Bakker DH; Ooms L; Veenhof C
BMC Fam Pract; 2015 Aug; 16():96. PubMed ID: 26245953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Practical Strategies to Improve the Clinical Utility of the Dermatopathology Report.
Trotter MJ; Au S; Naert KA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Aug; 140(8):759-65. PubMed ID: 27472234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Invisible dermatosis, diagnostic discrepancy between the general pathologist and dermatopathologist.
Alhumidi A; Alshamlan N; Alfaraidi M; Mohajer K
J Cutan Pathol; 2019 Dec; 46(12):905-912. PubMed ID: 31373705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Variation in the depth of excision of melanoma: A survey of US physicians.
DeFazio JL; Marghoob AA; Pan Y; Dusza SW; Khokhar A; Halpern A
Arch Dermatol; 2010 Sep; 146(9):995-9. PubMed ID: 20644028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Indications and immediate patient outcomes of pathology intraoperative consultations. College of American Pathologists/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Outcomes Working Group Study.
Zarbo RJ; Schmidt WA; Bachner P; Howanitz PJ; Meier FA; Schifman RB; Boone DJ; Herron RM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Jan; 120(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 8554440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Critical values in cytology.
Pereira TC; Clayton AC; Tazelaar HD; Liu Y; Leon M; Silverman JF
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Jun; 34(6):447-51. PubMed ID: 16680772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Peer review amongst restorative specialists on the quality of their communication with referring dental practitioners.
Ricketts DN; Scott BJ; Ali A; Chadwick RG; Murray CA; Radford JR; Saunders WP
Br Dent J; 2003 Oct; 195(7):389-93; discussion 383. PubMed ID: 14551631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Modifying phrases in surgical pathology reports: introduction of Standardized Scheme of Reporting Certainty in Pathology Reports (SSRC-Path).
Amin A; DeLellis RA; Fava JL
Virchows Arch; 2021 Nov; 479(5):1021-1029. PubMed ID: 34272982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Unexpected expectations in critical values in anatomic pathology: improving agreement between pathologists and nonpathologists with the treatable immediately, life-threatening terminology.
Renshaw SA; Gould EW; Renshaw AA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1391-3. PubMed ID: 22032563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Teledermatology as a tool for communication between general practitioners and dermatologists.
van den Akker TW; Reker CH; Knol A; Post J; Wilbrink J; van der Veen JP
J Telemed Telecare; 2001; 7(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 11506753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The radiology report as seen by radiologists and referring clinicians: results of the COVER and ROVER surveys.
Bosmans JM; Weyler JJ; De Schepper AM; Parizel PM
Radiology; 2011 Apr; 259(1):184-95. PubMed ID: 21224423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. What do general practitioners want from a dermatology department?
Harlow ED; Burton JL
Br J Dermatol; 1996 Feb; 134(2):313-8. PubMed ID: 8746348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. General practice and chiropractic in Norway: how well do they communicate and what do GPs want to know?
Langworthy JM; Birkelid J
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2001; 24(9):576-81. PubMed ID: 11753331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Communication of mammography results to women by radiologists: attitudes of referring health care providers.
Bassett LW; Bomyea K; Liu S; Sayre J
Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):235-8. PubMed ID: 7892477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Complementary health practitioners' attitudes, practices and knowledge related to women's cancers.
Gray RE; Fitch M; Saunders PR; Wilkinson A; Ross CP; Franssen E; Caverhill K
Cancer Prev Control; 1999 Feb; 3(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 10474756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Pseudolymphoma of the skin: ambiguous terminology: a survey among dermatologists and pathologists].
Levy E; Godet J; Cribier B; Lipsker D
Ann Dermatol Venereol; 2013 Feb; 140(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 23395491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Errors by surgical pathologists in India: results of a questionnaire survey.
Pai SA
Natl Med J India; 2003; 16(4):204-6. PubMed ID: 14606768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Critical values in anatomic pathology.
Silverman JF; Pereira TC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 May; 130(5):638-40. PubMed ID: 16683879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
