169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29496204)
1. Uptake and impact of synoptic reporting in a community care setting.
Eng JL; Baliski CR; McGahan C; Cai E
Am J Surg; 2018 May; 215(5):857-861. PubMed ID: 29496204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Completeness of dictated operative reports in breast cancer--the case for synoptic reporting.
Donahoe L; Bennett S; Temple W; Hilchie-Pye A; Dabbs K; Macintosh E; Porter G
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jul; 106(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 22234931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Completeness of breast cancer operative reports in a community care setting.
Eng JL; Baliski CR; McGahan C; Cai E
Breast; 2017 Oct; 35():91-97. PubMed ID: 28689055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do surgeons convey all the details? A provincial assessment of operative reporting for breast cancer.
Liu C; Cheifetz R; Brown C; Nichol A; Speers C; Lohrisch C; McKevitt E
Am J Surg; 2020 May; 219(5):780-784. PubMed ID: 32145920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Systematic Review on the Synoptic Operative Report Versus the Narrative Operative Report in Surgery.
Eryigit Ö; van de Graaf FW; Lange JF
World J Surg; 2019 Sep; 43(9):2175-2185. PubMed ID: 31049605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Completeness of operative reports for rectal cancer surgery.
Kanters AE; Vu JV; Schuman AD; Van Wieren I; Duby A; Hardiman KM; Hendren SK
Am J Surg; 2020 Jul; 220(1):165-169. PubMed ID: 31630821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The computerized synoptic operative report: a novel tool in surgical residency education.
Gur I; Gur D; Recabaren JA
Arch Surg; 2012 Jan; 147(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 21930975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of implementing synoptic pathology reporting in cancer diagnosis: a systematic review.
Sluijter CE; van Lonkhuijzen LR; van Slooten HJ; Nagtegaal ID; Overbeek LI
Virchows Arch; 2016 Jun; 468(6):639-49. PubMed ID: 27097810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Synoptic reporting increases quality of upper gastrointestinal cancer pathology reports.
Baranov NS; Nagtegaal ID; van Grieken NCT; Verhoeven RHA; Voorham QJM; Rosman C; van der Post RS
Virchows Arch; 2019 Aug; 475(2):255-259. PubMed ID: 31144018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electronic synoptic reporting: assessing the completeness of synoptic and narrative reports for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
Vergis A; Stogryn SE; Mullan MJ; Hardy K
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2017 Nov; 13(11):1863-1868. PubMed ID: 28433464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Synoptic operative reporting: assessing the completeness, accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of synoptic reporting for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
Stogryn SE; Hardy K; Mullan MJ; Park J; Andrew C; Vergis A
Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1729-1739. PubMed ID: 28917006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What impact has the introduction of a synoptic report for rectal cancer had on reporting outcomes for specialist gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal pathologists?
Messenger DE; McLeod RS; Kirsch R
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1471-5. PubMed ID: 22032575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of template-based synoptic reporting on completeness of surgical pathology reports.
Schaad N; Berezowska S; Perren A; Hewer E
Virchows Arch; 2024 Jan; 484(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 37017774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving operative documentation in colorectal cancer surgery: synoptic notes pave the way forward.
Buchanan J; McCombie A; Connor S; Eglinton T
ANZ J Surg; 2022 Jul; 92(7-8):1754-1759. PubMed ID: 35347833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Advancement in the quality of operative documentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of synoptic versus narrative operative reporting.
Stogryn S; Hardy KM; Abou-Setta AM; Clouston KM; Metcalfe J; Vergis AS
Am J Surg; 2019 Sep; 218(3):624-630. PubMed ID: 31130211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Synoptic operative reports enhance documentation of best practices for rectal cancer.
Maniar RL; Sytnik P; Wirtzfeld DA; Hochman DJ; McKay AM; Yip B; Hebbard PC; Park J
J Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 112(5):555-60. PubMed ID: 26380931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Documentation of quality of care data for colon cancer surgery: comparison of synoptic and dictated operative reports.
Maniar RL; Hochman DJ; Wirtzfeld DA; McKay AM; Yaffe CS; Yip B; Silverman R; Park J
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 21(11):3592-7. PubMed ID: 24793437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Synoptic operative reporting in cancer surgery: A scoping review.
Watanabe A; Nabata K; Wiseman SM
Am J Surg; 2023 May; 225(5):878-886. PubMed ID: 36635131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality of narrative operative reports in pancreatic surgery.
Wiebe ME; Sandhu L; Takata JL; Kennedy ED; Baxter NN; Gagliardi AR; Urbach DR; Wei AC
Can J Surg; 2013 Oct; 56(5):E121-7. PubMed ID: 24067527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reporting: a population-based approach.
Srigley JR; McGowan T; Maclean A; Raby M; Ross J; Kramer S; Sawka C
J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jun; 99(8):517-24. PubMed ID: 19466743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
