These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29497393)

  • 1. Is Social Categorization Spatially Organized in a "Mental Line"? Empirical Evidences for Spatial Bias in Intergroup Differentiation.
    Presaghi F; Rullo M
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():152. PubMed ID: 29497393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The contributions of positive outgroup and negative ingroup evaluation to implicit bias favoring outgroups.
    Calanchini J; Schmidt K; Sherman JW; Klein SAW
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Oct; 119(40):e2116924119. PubMed ID: 36161932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When does activating diversity alleviate, when does it increase intergroup bias? An ingroup projection perspective.
    Steffens MC; Reese G; Ehrke F; Jonas KJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178738. PubMed ID: 28582443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.
    Fattorini E; Pinto M; Merola S; D'Onofrio M; Doricchi F
    Prog Brain Res; 2016; 227():223-56. PubMed ID: 27339014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reconstructing the origins of the space-number association: spatial and number-magnitude codes must be used jointly to elicit spatially organised mental number lines.
    Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Marson F; Lasaponara S; Doricchi F
    Cognition; 2019 Sep; 190():143-156. PubMed ID: 31079015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why do people perceive ingroup homogeneity on ingroup traits and outgroup homogeneity on outgroup traits?
    Rubin M; Badea C
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Jan; 33(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 17178928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Social perception as induction and inference: an integrative model of intergroup differentiation, ingroup favoritism, and differential accuracy.
    DiDonato TE; Ullrich J; Krueger JI
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Jan; 100(1):66-83. PubMed ID: 20939650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceiving ingroup and outgroup faces within and across nations.
    Kawakami K; Friesen JP; Fang X
    Br J Psychol; 2022 Aug; 113(3):551-574. PubMed ID: 35383905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A developmental intergroup theory of social stereotypes and prejudice.
    Bigler RS; Liben LS
    Adv Child Dev Behav; 2006; 34():39-89. PubMed ID: 17120802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrasting left/right codes for response selection must not be necessarily associated with contrasting numerical features to get the SNARC.
    Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Lasaponara S; Cestari V; Doricchi F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102887. PubMed ID: 31351325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanism of the SNARC Effect in Numerical Magnitude, Time Sequence, and Spatial Sequence Tasks: Involvement of LTM and WM.
    Wang Q; Liu M; Shi W; Kang J
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1558. PubMed ID: 30186215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Thermal facial reactivity patterns predict social categorization bias triggered by unconscious and conscious emotional stimuli.
    Ponsi G; Panasiti MS; Rizza G; Aglioti SM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Aug; 284(1861):. PubMed ID: 28855358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attention and Working Memory Biases to Black and Asian Faces During Intergroup Contexts.
    Gonzalez GDS; Schnyer DM
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2743. PubMed ID: 30687191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The stigma of mental illness: Testing for the implicit bias in diagnostic labels.
    Schlier B; Lincoln TM
    Psychiatry Res; 2019 May; 275():221-227. PubMed ID: 30928725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the immediate consequences of intergroup categorization: activation of approach and avoidance motor behavior toward ingroup and outgroup members.
    Paladino MP; Castelli L
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jun; 34(6):755-68. PubMed ID: 18388255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Social group membership and an incidental ingroup-memory advantage.
    Jeon YA; Banquer AM; Navangul AS; Kim K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Jan; 74(1):166-178. PubMed ID: 32705946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rapid communication The mental number line dominates alternative, explicit coding of number magnitude.
    Dollman J; Levine WH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):403-9. PubMed ID: 26445276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The SNARC effect in two dimensions: Evidence for a frontoparallel mental number plane.
    Hesse PN; Bremmer F
    Vision Res; 2017 Jan; 130():85-96. PubMed ID: 27836333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimal-group membership influences children's responses to novel experience with group members.
    Schug MG; Shusterman A; Barth H; Patalano AL
    Dev Sci; 2013 Jan; 16(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 23278926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.
    Leth-Steensen C; Citta R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):482-94. PubMed ID: 26213330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.