These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29497688)

  • 1. Redundant-target processing is robust against changes to task load.
    Morey SA; Thomas NA; McCarley JS
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2018; 3(1):4. PubMed ID: 29497688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Capacity limitations in visual word processing.
    Mullin PA; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Feb; 15(1):111-23. PubMed ID: 2522521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Absence of distracting information explains the redundant signals effect for a centrally presented categorization task.
    Mishler AD; Neider MB
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Nov; 181():18-26. PubMed ID: 29028518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The electrophysiological locus of the redundant target effect on visual discrimination in a dual singleton search task.
    Akyürek EG; Schubö A
    Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 1537():180-90. PubMed ID: 24060644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the speed--accuracy trade-off effect on the capacity of information processing.
    Donkin C; Little DR; Houpt JW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):1183-202. PubMed ID: 24635202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual search for dimensionally redundant pop-out targets: parallel-coactive processing of dimensions is location specific.
    Krummenacher J; Müller HJ; Heller D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Dec; 28(6):1303-22. PubMed ID: 12542129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the costs of parallel processing in dual-task performance: The case of lexical processing in word production.
    Paucke M; Oppermann F; Koch I; Jescheniak JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1539-52. PubMed ID: 26375632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Working memory capacity and redundant information processing efficiency.
    Endres MJ; Houpt JW; Donkin C; Finn PR
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():594. PubMed ID: 26074828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Working memory's workload capacity.
    Heathcote A; Coleman JR; Eidels A; Watson JM; Houpt J; Strayer DL
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Oct; 43(7):973-89. PubMed ID: 25962602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Species of redundancy in visual target detection.
    Ben-David BM; Algom D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):958-76. PubMed ID: 19653742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual differences in working memory capacity and workload capacity.
    Yu JC; Chang TY; Yang CT
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1465. PubMed ID: 25566143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parallel and serial processing in dual-tasking differentially involves mechanisms in the striatum and the lateral prefrontal cortex.
    Yildiz A; Beste C
    Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Nov; 220(6):3131-42. PubMed ID: 25017192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Element-level features in conjoint episodes in dual-tasking.
    Pelzer L; Naefgen C; Gaschler R; Haider H
    Psychol Res; 2023 Jun; 87(4):1193-1207. PubMed ID: 35948687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Role of multiple resources in predicting time-sharing efficiency: evaluation of three workload models in a multiple-task setting.
    Sarno KJ; Wickens CD
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1995; 5(1):107-30. PubMed ID: 11541493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An examination of the processing capacity of features in the Thatcher illusion.
    Donnelly N; Cornes K; Menneer T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1475-87. PubMed ID: 22707354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Redundancy gains in simple responses and go/no-go tasks.
    Gondan M; Götze C; Greenlee MW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1692-709. PubMed ID: 20675811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The functional neuroanatomy of multitasking: combining dual tasking with a short term memory task.
    Deprez S; Vandenbulcke M; Peeters R; Emsell L; Amant F; Sunaert S
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Sep; 51(11):2251-60. PubMed ID: 23938320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. From parallel to serial processing: a computational study of visual search.
    Cohen E; Ruppin E
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Oct; 61(7):1449-61. PubMed ID: 10572471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.