218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29498000)
1. Economic Analysis of First-Line Treatment with Cetuximab or Panitumumab for RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in England.
Tikhonova IA; Huxley N; Snowsill T; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Napier M; Hoyle M
Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Jul; 36(7):837-851. PubMed ID: 29498000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of targeted therapy with cetuximab in patients with K-ras wild-type colorectal cancer presenting with initially unresectable metastases limited to the liver in a German setting.
Asseburg C; Frank M; Köhne CH; Hartmann JT; Griebsch I; Mohr A; Osowski U; Schulten J; Mittendorf T
Clin Ther; 2011 Apr; 33(4):482-97. PubMed ID: 21635994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Aflibercept in Combination with Irinotecan and Fluorouracil-Based Therapy (FOLFIRI) for the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Which has Progressed Following Prior Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy: a Critique of the Evidence.
Wade R; Duarte A; Simmonds M; Rodriguez-Lopez R; Duffy S; Woolacott N; Spackman E
Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 May; 33(5):457-66. PubMed ID: 25616671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab, cetuximab plus irinotecan, and panitumumab for third and further lines of treatment for KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Hoyle M; Peters J; Crathorne L; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Hyde C
Value Health; 2013; 16(2):288-96. PubMed ID: 23538180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.
Hoyle M; Crathorne L; Peters J; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Tappenden P; Hyde C
Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(14):1-237. PubMed ID: 23547747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Prescrire Int; 2010 Oct; 19(109):219-24. PubMed ID: 21180382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-minimization analysis of panitumumab compared with cetuximab for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Graham CN; Hechmati G; Fakih MG; Knox HN; Maglinte GA; Hjelmgren J; Barber B; Schwartzberg LS
J Med Econ; 2015; 18(8):619-28. PubMed ID: 25822327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Graham CN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; de Liège F; Lanier J; Knox H; Barber B
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Nov; 50(16):2791-801. PubMed ID: 25219451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of KRAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients in the United States and Germany.
Vijayaraghavan A; Efrusy MB; Göke B; Kirchner T; Santas CC; Goldberg RM
Int J Cancer; 2012 Jul; 131(2):438-45. PubMed ID: 21898389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective Observational Cohort Study to Describe the Use of Panitumumab in Combination with Chemotherapy in Real-World Clinical Practice for Patients with Wild-Type RAS mCRC.
Hebart H; Kiehl M; Tomasek J; Csoszi T; Koukakis R; Kafatos G; Kuhn A; Bjorklof K; Demonty G; Buchler T
Adv Ther; 2019 Mar; 36(3):670-683. PubMed ID: 30689133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Markov model assessing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of FOLFOX compared with FOLFIRI for the initial treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Tumeh JW; Shenoy PJ; Moore SG; Kauh J; Flowers C
Am J Clin Oncol; 2009 Feb; 32(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 19194125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Progress in metastatic colorectal cancer: growing role of cetuximab to optimize clinical outcome.
García-Foncillas J; Díaz-Rubio E
Clin Transl Oncol; 2010 Aug; 12(8):533-42. PubMed ID: 20709651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of KRAS/NRAS Mutations in a Phase III Study of Panitumumab with FOLFIRI Compared with FOLFIRI Alone as Second-line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Peeters M; Oliner KS; Price TJ; Cervantes A; Sobrero AF; Ducreux M; Hotko Y; André T; Chan E; Lordick F; Punt CJ; Strickland AH; Wilson G; Ciuleanu TE; Roman L; Van Cutsem E; He P; Yu H; Koukakis R; Terwey JH; Jung AS; Sidhu R; Patterson SD
Clin Cancer Res; 2015 Dec; 21(24):5469-79. PubMed ID: 26341920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. FOLFOXIRI in combination with panitumumab as first-line treatment in quadruple wild-type (KRAS, NRAS, HRAS, BRAF) metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a phase II trial by the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest (GONO).
Fornaro L; Lonardi S; Masi G; Loupakis F; Bergamo F; Salvatore L; Cremolini C; Schirripa M; Vivaldi C; Aprile G; Zaniboni A; Bracarda S; Fontanini G; Sensi E; Lupi C; Morvillo M; Zagonel V; Falcone A
Ann Oncol; 2013 Aug; 24(8):2062-7. PubMed ID: 23666916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. No survival benefit from adding cetuximab or panitumumab to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in KRAS wild type patients: a meta-analysis.
Zhou SW; Huang YY; Wei Y; Jiang ZM; Zhang YD; Yang Q; Xie DR
PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e50925. PubMed ID: 23226426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative and cost-effectiveness of oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based regimens compared with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin alone among US elderly stage IV colon cancer patients.
Mullins CD; Hsiao FY; Onukwugha E; Pandya NB; Hanna N
Cancer; 2012 Jun; 118(12):3173-81. PubMed ID: 22020739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Economic analysis of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Lawrence D; Maschio M; Leahy KJ; Yunger S; Easaw JC; Weinstein MC
J Med Econ; 2013 Dec; 16(12):1387-98. PubMed ID: 24102083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-minimization analysis of sequence changes between FOLFIRI and FOLFOX6 therapy for advanced colorectal cancer in Japan.
Miyazaki Y; Harada T; Akase T; Arakawa I; Inoue T
Clin Ther; 2009; 31 Pt 2():2433-41. PubMed ID: 20110051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness projections of oxaliplatin and infusional fluorouracil versus irinotecan and bolus fluorouracil in first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal carcinoma.
Hillner BE; Schrag D; Sargent DJ; Fuchs CS; Goldberg RM
Cancer; 2005 Nov; 104(9):1871-84. PubMed ID: 16177989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. KRAS mutation testing of tumours in adults with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Westwood M; van Asselt T; Ramaekers B; Whiting P; Joore M; Armstrong N; Noake C; Ross J; Severens J; Kleijnen J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Oct; 18(62):1-132. PubMed ID: 25314637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
