These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29498000)

  • 1. Economic Analysis of First-Line Treatment with Cetuximab or Panitumumab for RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in England.
    Tikhonova IA; Huxley N; Snowsill T; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Napier M; Hoyle M
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Jul; 36(7):837-851. PubMed ID: 29498000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (review of technology appraisal no. 176) and panitumumab (partial review of technology appraisal no. 240) for previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Huxley N; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Tikhonova I; Snowsill T; Briscoe S; Peters J; Bond M; Napier M; Hoyle M
    Health Technol Assess; 2017 Jun; 21(38):1-294. PubMed ID: 28682222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Panitumumab Plus FOLFIRI for the Second-Line Treatment of Patients with Wild-Type Ras Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Shi Y; Wan X; Tan C; Li J; Peng L
    Adv Ther; 2020 Feb; 37(2):847-859. PubMed ID: 31902066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer based on the TAILOR trial.
    Wang H; Huang L; Gao P; Zhu Z; Ye W; Ding H; Fang L
    BMJ Open; 2020 Feb; 10(2):e030738. PubMed ID: 32051297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of targeted therapy with cetuximab in patients with K-ras wild-type colorectal cancer presenting with initially unresectable metastases limited to the liver in a German setting.
    Asseburg C; Frank M; Köhne CH; Hartmann JT; Griebsch I; Mohr A; Osowski U; Schulten J; Mittendorf T
    Clin Ther; 2011 Apr; 33(4):482-97. PubMed ID: 21635994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Aflibercept in Combination with Irinotecan and Fluorouracil-Based Therapy (FOLFIRI) for the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Which has Progressed Following Prior Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy: a Critique of the Evidence.
    Wade R; Duarte A; Simmonds M; Rodriguez-Lopez R; Duffy S; Woolacott N; Spackman E
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 May; 33(5):457-66. PubMed ID: 25616671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Sequences of the Use of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors for Wild-Type KRAS Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Riesco-Martínez MC; Berry SR; Ko YJ; Mittmann N; Giotis A; Lien K; Wong WW; Chan KK
    J Oncol Pract; 2016 Jun; 12(6):e710-23. PubMed ID: 27143148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consequences of Biomarker Analysis on the Cost-Effectiveness of Cetuximab in Combination with FOLFIRI as a First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Personalised Medicine at Work.
    Harty G; Jarrett J; Jofre-Bonet M
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2018 Aug; 16(4):515-525. PubMed ID: 29948926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-minimization analysis of biweekly dosing of cetuximab and FOLFIRI compared with panitumumab and FOLFOX for first-line treatment of patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer in the United States.
    Gathirua-Mwangi WG; Sethi H; Afable MG; Bhattacharyya D; Khan T
    J Med Econ; 2021; 24(1):1164-1172. PubMed ID: 34529522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab, cetuximab plus irinotecan, and panitumumab for third and further lines of treatment for KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Hoyle M; Peters J; Crathorne L; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Hyde C
    Value Health; 2013; 16(2):288-96. PubMed ID: 23538180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.
    Hoyle M; Crathorne L; Peters J; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Tappenden P; Hyde C
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(14):1-237. PubMed ID: 23547747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of FOLFIRI + cetuximab vs FOLFIRI + bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of
    Stintzing S; van Oostrum I; Pescott CP; Ronga P; Heeg B; Heinemann V
    J Med Econ; 2020 May; 23(5):448-455. PubMed ID: 31903807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Prescrire Int; 2010 Oct; 19(109):219-24. PubMed ID: 21180382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative Cost-effectiveness of Aflibercept and Ramucirumab in Combination with Irinotecan and Fluorouracil-based Therapy for the Second-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Japan.
    Kashiwa M; Matsushita R
    Clin Ther; 2020 Jul; 42(7):1361-1375. PubMed ID: 32616433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-minimization analysis of panitumumab compared with cetuximab for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Graham CN; Hechmati G; Fakih MG; Knox HN; Maglinte GA; Hjelmgren J; Barber B; Schwartzberg LS
    J Med Econ; 2015; 18(8):619-28. PubMed ID: 25822327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Graham CN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; de Liège F; Lanier J; Knox H; Barber B
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Nov; 50(16):2791-801. PubMed ID: 25219451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of KRAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients in the United States and Germany.
    Vijayaraghavan A; Efrusy MB; Göke B; Kirchner T; Santas CC; Goldberg RM
    Int J Cancer; 2012 Jul; 131(2):438-45. PubMed ID: 21898389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First-Line FOLFIRI Combined With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab in Patients With RAS Wild-Type Left-Sided Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Han J; Xiao D; Tan C; Zeng X; Hu H; Zeng S; Jiang Q; She L; Yao L; Li L; Tang L; Ma J; Huang J; Shen L
    Cancer Control; 2020; 27(1):1073274820902271. PubMed ID: 32107929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective Observational Cohort Study to Describe the Use of Panitumumab in Combination with Chemotherapy in Real-World Clinical Practice for Patients with Wild-Type RAS mCRC.
    Hebart H; Kiehl M; Tomasek J; Csoszi T; Koukakis R; Kafatos G; Kuhn A; Bjorklof K; Demonty G; Buchler T
    Adv Ther; 2019 Mar; 36(3):670-683. PubMed ID: 30689133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness analysis in the Spanish setting of the PEAK trial of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Rivera F; Valladares M; Gea S; López-Martínez N
    J Med Econ; 2017 Jun; 20(6):574-584. PubMed ID: 28107090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.