These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

735 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29499043)

  • 21. Patient and public engagement in research and health system decision making: A systematic review of evaluation tools.
    Boivin A; L'Espérance A; Gauvin FP; Dumez V; Macaulay AC; Lehoux P; Abelson J
    Health Expect; 2018 Dec; 21(6):1075-1084. PubMed ID: 30062858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Explore the practice and barriers of collaborative health policy and system research-priority setting exercise in Ethiopia.
    Tilahun B; Amare G; Endehabtu BF; Atnafu A; Derseh L; Gurmu KK; Delllie E; Nigusie A
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2024 May; 22(1):64. PubMed ID: 38816760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Priority setting for maternal, newborn and child health in Uganda: a qualitative study evaluating actual practice.
    Wallace LJ; Kapiriri L
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Jul; 19(1):465. PubMed ID: 31286950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Group's systematic review priority-setting project.
    Synnot A; Tong A; Ryan R; Hill S
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2020 Sep; 18(1):98. PubMed ID: 32878617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A proposed methodology for uncertainty extraction and verification in priority setting partnerships with the James Lind Alliance: an example from the Common Conditions Affecting the Hand and Wrist Priority Setting Partnership.
    Grindlay DJC; Davis TRC; Kennedy D; Larson D; Furniss D; Cowan K; Giddins G; Jain A; Trickett RW; Karantana A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Nov; 22(1):292. PubMed ID: 36357847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Towards inclusive priority-setting for global health research projects: recommendations for sharing power with communities.
    Pratt B
    Health Policy Plan; 2019 Jun; 34(5):346-357. PubMed ID: 31168568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Applying priority-setting frameworks: A review of public and vulnerable populations' participation in health-system priority setting.
    Razavi SD; Kapiriri L; Wilson M; Abelson J
    Health Policy; 2020 Feb; 124(2):133-142. PubMed ID: 31874742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. International research priority setting exercises in stroke: A systematic review.
    Leitch S; Logan M; Beishon L; Quinn TJ
    Int J Stroke; 2023 Feb; 18(2):133-143. PubMed ID: 35422174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.
    Callaghan A; Kendall G; Lock C; Mahony A; Payne J; Verrier L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2005 Jul; 3(6):147-67. PubMed ID: 21631747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Priority-setting in public health research funding organisations: an exploratory qualitative study among five high-profile funders.
    Cartier Y; Creatore MI; Hoffman SJ; Potvin L
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2018 Jun; 16(1):53. PubMed ID: 29933748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Supporting quality public and patient engagement in health system organizations: development and usability testing of the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool.
    Abelson J; Li K; Wilson G; Shields K; Schneider C; Boesveld S
    Health Expect; 2016 Aug; 19(4):817-27. PubMed ID: 26113295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Patient and Public Involvement in Identifying Dementia Research Priorities.
    Bethell J; Pringle D; Chambers LW; Cohen C; Commisso E; Cowan K; Fehr P; Laupacis A; Szeto P; McGilton KS
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2018 Aug; 66(8):1608-1612. PubMed ID: 30084194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. What are the most important unanswered research questions on rapid review methodology? A James Lind Alliance research methodology Priority Setting Partnership: the Priority III study protocol.
    Beecher C; Toomey E; Maeso B; Whiting C; Stewart DC; Worrall A; Elliott J; Smith M; Tierney T; Blackwood B; Maguire T; Kampman M; Ling B; Gravel C; Gill C; Healy P; Houghton C; Booth A; Garritty C; Thomas J; Tricco AC; Burke NN; Keenan C; Westmore M; Devane D
    HRB Open Res; 2021; 4():80. PubMed ID: 34693206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
    MacKinnon K; Marcellus L; Rivers J; Gordon C; Ryan M; Butcher D
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26447004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Research priority setting in plastic and reconstructive surgery: A systematic review.
    Lee A; Higginbotham G; Davies P; Young A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Jan; 76():148-159. PubMed ID: 36516507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Social values and health priority setting in Australia: an analysis applied to the context of health technology assessment.
    Whitty JA; Littlejohns P
    Health Policy; 2015 Feb; 119(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 25267072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Involving stakeholders in research priority setting: a scoping review.
    Grill C
    Res Involv Engagem; 2021 Oct; 7(1):75. PubMed ID: 34715932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.