These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29499212)

  • 1. Stable individual differences predict eye movements to the left, but not handedness or line bisection.
    Foulsham T; Frost E; Sage L
    Vision Res; 2018 Mar; 144():38-46. PubMed ID: 29499212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eye dominance modulates visuospatial attention.
    Schintu S; Chaumillon R; Guillaume A; Salemme R; Reilly KT; Pisella L; Farnè A
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Apr; 141():107314. PubMed ID: 31870684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Leftward biases in picture scanning and line bisection: a gaze-contingent window study.
    Foulsham T; Gray A; Nasiopoulos E; Kingstone A
    Vision Res; 2013 Jan; 78():14-25. PubMed ID: 23257282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of cerebral asymmetries and eye scanning on pseudoneglect for a visual search task.
    Nicholls ME; Hobson A; Petty J; Churches O; Thomas NA
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Feb; 111():134-143. PubMed ID: 27923149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cognitive and perceptual influences on visual line bisection: psychophysical and chronometric analyses of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Olafson C
    Neuropsychologia; 1997 Mar; 35(3):369-80. PubMed ID: 9051685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial asymmetries ("pseudoneglect") in free visual exploration-modulation of age and relationship to line bisection.
    Chiffi K; Diana L; Hartmann M; Cazzoli D; Bassetti CL; Müri RM; Eberhard-Moscicka AK
    Exp Brain Res; 2021 Sep; 239(9):2693-2700. PubMed ID: 34218299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers.
    Zago L; Petit L; Jobard G; Hay J; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N; Karnath HO; Mellet E
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():75-83. PubMed ID: 27916670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dissociation between line bisection and mental-number-line bisection in healthy adults.
    Rotondaro F; Merola S; Aiello M; Pinto M; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():565-76. PubMed ID: 26188312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trunk rotation affects temporal order judgments with direct saccades: Influence of handedness.
    Paschke K; Kagan I; Wüstenberg T; Bähr M; Wilke M
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Dec; 79(Pt A):123-37. PubMed ID: 26518506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stable individual differences in saccadic eye movements during reading, pseudoreading, scene viewing, and scene search.
    Henderson JM; Luke SG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1390-400. PubMed ID: 24730735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strong rightward lateralization of the dorsal attentional network in left-handers with right sighting-eye: an evolutionary advantage.
    Petit L; Zago L; Mellet E; Jobard G; Crivello F; Joliot M; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Mar; 36(3):1151-64. PubMed ID: 25409934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Related but different: Examining pseudoneglect in audition, touch and vision.
    Eardley AF; Darling S; Dumper P; Browne D; Van Velzen J
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Apr; 113():164-171. PubMed ID: 28242465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the neural origin of pseudoneglect: EEG-correlates of shifts in line bisection performance with manipulation of line length.
    Benwell CS; Harvey M; Thut G
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86(100):370-80. PubMed ID: 24128738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines.
    Toba MN; Cavanagh P; Bartolomeo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 21110990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual bias, more than age, impacts on eye movements during face processing.
    Williams LR; Grealy MA; Kelly SW; Henderson I; Butler SH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Feb; 164():127-35. PubMed ID: 26799983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are the perceptual biases found in chimeric face processing reflected in eye-movement patterns?
    Butler S; Gilchrist ID; Burt DM; Perrett DI; Jones E; Harvey M
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 15488905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Line bisection under an attentional gradient induced by simulated neglect in healthy subjects.
    Grewal P; Viswanathan J; Barton JJ; Lanyon LJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1190-201. PubMed ID: 22118912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Central fixations with rightward deviations: saccadic eye movements on the landmark task.
    Thomas NA; Loetscher T; Nicholls ME
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Jul; 220(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 22623091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parietal damage dissociates saccade planning from presaccadic perceptual facilitation.
    Khan AZ; Blangero A; Rossetti Y; Salemme R; Luauté J; Deubel H; Schneider WX; Laverdure N; Rode G; Boisson D; Pisella L
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Feb; 19(2):383-7. PubMed ID: 18534990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age-related changes in visual pseudoneglect.
    Schmitz R; Peigneux P
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Aug; 76(3):382-9. PubMed ID: 21536360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.