These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29499212)

  • 21. Pseudoneglect during object search in naturalistic scenes.
    Nuthmann A; Clark CNL
    Exp Brain Res; 2023 Sep; 241(9):2345-2360. PubMed ID: 37610677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The reliability of pseudoneglect is task dependent.
    Mitchell AG; Harris JM; Benstock SE; Ales JM
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Nov; 148():107618. PubMed ID: 32891646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Centripetal versus centrifugal bias in visual line bisection: focusing attention on two hypotheses.
    McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M; Slater J
    Front Biosci; 2000 Jan; 5():D58-71. PubMed ID: 10702377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Right hemisphere dominance directly predicts both baseline V1 cortical excitability and the degree of top-down modulation exerted over low-level brain structures.
    Arshad Q; Siddiqui S; Ramachandran S; Goga U; Bonsu A; Patel M; Roberts RE; Nigmatullina Y; Malhotra P; Bronstein AM
    Neuroscience; 2015 Dec; 311():484-9. PubMed ID: 26518461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sex differences in line bisection as a function of hand.
    Hausmann M; Ergun G; Yazgan Y; Güntürkün O
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 11684155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. No direction specific costs in trans-saccadic memory.
    Ten Brink AF; Nijboer TCW; Fabius JH; Van der Stigchel S
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Mar; 125():23-29. PubMed ID: 30695711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contralesional spatial bias in chronic hemianopia: the role of (ec)centric fixation, spatial cueing and visual search.
    Kuhn C; Bublak P; Jobst U; Rosenthal A; Reinhart S; Kerkhoff G
    Neuroscience; 2012 May; 210():118-27. PubMed ID: 22465437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dissociations in rod bisection: the effect of viewing conditions on perception and action.
    Hughes LE; Bates TC; Aimola Davies AM
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1279-87. PubMed ID: 18761142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Functional asymmetries revealed in visually guided saccades: an FMRI study.
    Petit L; Zago L; Vigneau M; Andersson F; Crivello F; Mazoyer B; Mellet E; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Nov; 102(5):2994-3003. PubMed ID: 19710382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bisection of shapes and lines: analysis of the visual and motor aspects of pseudoneglect.
    Macdonald-Nethercott EM; Kinnear PR; Venneri A
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Aug; 91(1):217-26. PubMed ID: 11011891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using temporally aligned event-related potentials for the investigation of attention shifts prior to and during saccades.
    Huber-Huber C; Ditye T; Marchante Fernández M; Ansorge U
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Nov; 92():129-141. PubMed ID: 27059211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. More far is more right: Manual and ocular line bisections, but not the Judd illusion, depend on radial space.
    Rinaldi L; Bertolini G; Bockisch CJ; Maravita A; Girelli L; Brugger P
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Apr; 122():34-44. PubMed ID: 29428805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The relationship between spatial cognition and walking trajectory for passing through a doorway: evident in individuals with dominant right eye?
    Kitayama S; Fujikake H; Kokubu M; Higuchi T
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 233(3):797-807. PubMed ID: 25432626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does spatial cueing affect line bisection in chronic hemianopia?
    Kuhn C; Rosenthal A; Bublak P; Grotemeyer KH; Reinhart S; Kerkhoff G
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1656-62. PubMed ID: 22480681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of viewing eye on pseudoneglect magnitude.
    McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M; Butler J
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2001 Mar; 7(3):391-5. PubMed ID: 11311040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Eye-catching: right hemisphere attentional bias for emotional pictures.
    Alpers GW
    Laterality; 2008 Mar; 13(2):158-78. PubMed ID: 18302058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Eye movement and online bisection task in unilateral patients with neglect: a new look to the 'gradient effect'.
    Balconi M; Amenta S; Sozzi M; Cannatà AP; Pisani L
    Brain Inj; 2013; 27(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 23438350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Verbal dichotic listening in developmental stuttering: subgroups with atypical auditory processing.
    Foundas AL; Corey DM; Hurley MM; Heilman KM
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2004 Dec; 17(4):224-32. PubMed ID: 15622019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A rightward saccade to an unexpected stimulus as a marker for lateralised visuospatial attention.
    Sanefuji M; Yamashita H; Torio M; Katsuki D; Akamine S; Ishizaki Y; Kishimoto J; Sakai Y; Takada H; Yoshida K; Ohga S
    Sci Rep; 2018 May; 8(1):7562. PubMed ID: 29765090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Spatial biases in viewing behavior.
    Ossandón JP; Onat S; König P
    J Vis; 2014 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 24569986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.