These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review. Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uptake of methods to deal with publication bias in systematic reviews has increased over time, but there is still much scope for improvement. Parekh-Bhurke S; Kwok CS; Pang C; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder JJ; Sutton AJ; Hing CB; Harvey I; Song F J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 20800992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. Song F; Parekh S; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder J; Sutton AJ; Hing C; Kwok CS; Pang C; Harvey I Health Technol Assess; 2010 Feb; 14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. PubMed ID: 20181324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The PRISMA Statement - what should be reported about systematic reviews?]. Antes G; von Elm E Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Aug; 134(33):1619. PubMed ID: 19650021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. From the five blind men to Cochrane Complementary Medicine systematic reviews. Ezzo J J Altern Complement Med; 2003 Dec; 9(6):969-72. PubMed ID: 14736367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence. Skelly AC; Hashimoto RE; Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fischer DJ; Wilson JR; Tetreault LA; Fehlings MG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. PubMed ID: 24026148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic reviews: guidance relevant for studies of older people. Shenkin SD; Harrison JK; Wilkinson T; Dodds RM; Ioannidis JPA Age Ageing; 2017 Sep; 46(5):722-728. PubMed ID: 28655142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature. Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on tuberculosis. Nicolau I; Ling D; Tian L; Lienhardt C; Pai M Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2013 Sep; 17(9):1160-9. PubMed ID: 23809432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology): The Joanna Briggs Institute's approach. Moola S; Munn Z; Sears K; Sfetcu R; Currie M; Lisy K; Tufanaru C; Qureshi R; Mattis P; Mu P Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26262566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Overviews - status quo, potentials and perspectives]. Pieper D; Büchter RB; Antoine SL; Eikermann M Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2013; 107(9-10):592-6. PubMed ID: 24315329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic reviews: a logical methodological extension of evidence-based medicine. Gallagher EJ Acad Emerg Med; 1999 Dec; 6(12):1255-60. PubMed ID: 10609928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]