These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29499652)

  • 1. Systematic reviews and cancer research: a suggested stepwise approach.
    Kelley GA; Kelley KS
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Mar; 18(1):246. PubMed ID: 29499652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    Haase SC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Feb; 127(2):955-966. PubMed ID: 21285802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhancing reproducibility: Failures from Reproducibility Initiatives underline core challenges.
    Mullane K; Williams M
    Biochem Pharmacol; 2017 Aug; 138():7-18. PubMed ID: 28396196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reporting and publishing guidelines: article 12 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
    Wilson KC; Irwin RS; File TM; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH; Rabe KF;
    Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 23256173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A systematic guide for peer reviewers for a medical journal.
    Garfield JM; Kaye AD; Kolinsky DC; Urman RD
    J Med Pract Manage; 2015; 30(6 Spec No):13-7. PubMed ID: 26062311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in nutrition research.
    Kelley GA; Kelley KS
    Br J Nutr; 2019 Dec; 122(11):1279-1294. PubMed ID: 31478479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uptake of methods to deal with publication bias in systematic reviews has increased over time, but there is still much scope for improvement.
    Parekh-Bhurke S; Kwok CS; Pang C; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder JJ; Sutton AJ; Hing CB; Harvey I; Song F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 20800992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.
    Song F; Parekh S; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder J; Sutton AJ; Hing C; Kwok CS; Pang C; Harvey I
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Feb; 14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. PubMed ID: 20181324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The PRISMA Statement - what should be reported about systematic reviews?].
    Antes G; von Elm E
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Aug; 134(33):1619. PubMed ID: 19650021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. From the five blind men to Cochrane Complementary Medicine systematic reviews.
    Ezzo J
    J Altern Complement Med; 2003 Dec; 9(6):969-72. PubMed ID: 14736367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine.
    DiSilvestro KJ; Tjoumakaris FP; Maltenfort MG; Spindler KP; Freedman KB
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):533-8. PubMed ID: 25899433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.
    Skelly AC; Hashimoto RE; Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fischer DJ; Wilson JR; Tetreault LA; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. PubMed ID: 24026148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic reviews: guidance relevant for studies of older people.
    Shenkin SD; Harrison JK; Wilkinson T; Dodds RM; Ioannidis JPA
    Age Ageing; 2017 Sep; 46(5):722-728. PubMed ID: 28655142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on tuberculosis.
    Nicolau I; Ling D; Tian L; Lienhardt C; Pai M
    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2013 Sep; 17(9):1160-9. PubMed ID: 23809432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology): The Joanna Briggs Institute's approach.
    Moola S; Munn Z; Sears K; Sfetcu R; Currie M; Lisy K; Tufanaru C; Qureshi R; Mattis P; Mu P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26262566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Overviews - status quo, potentials and perspectives].
    Pieper D; Büchter RB; Antoine SL; Eikermann M
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2013; 107(9-10):592-6. PubMed ID: 24315329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic reviews: a logical methodological extension of evidence-based medicine.
    Gallagher EJ
    Acad Emerg Med; 1999 Dec; 6(12):1255-60. PubMed ID: 10609928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.