265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29500480)
1. Feasibility of state of the art PET/CT systems performance harmonisation.
Kaalep A; Sera T; Rijnsdorp S; Yaqub M; Talsma A; Lodge MA; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Jul; 45(8):1344-1361. PubMed ID: 29500480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. EANM/EARL FDG-PET/CT accreditation - summary results from the first 200 accredited imaging systems.
Kaalep A; Sera T; Oyen W; Krause BJ; Chiti A; Liu Y; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Mar; 45(3):412-422. PubMed ID: 29192365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feasibility of PET/CT system performance harmonisation for quantitative multicentre
Kaalep A; Huisman M; Sera T; Vugts D; Boellaard R; ; ;
EJNMMI Phys; 2018 Nov; 5(1):26. PubMed ID: 30460577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4.
Lasnon C; Majdoub M; Lavigne B; Do P; Madelaine J; Visvikis D; Hatt M; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Dec; 43(13):2324-2335. PubMed ID: 27325312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SUV Harmonization Between Different Hybrid PET/CT Systems.
Rubello D; Colletti PM
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 43(11):811-814. PubMed ID: 30199381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Why harmonization is needed when using FDG PET/CT as a prognosticator: demonstration with EARL-compliant SUV as an independent prognostic factor in lung cancer.
Houdu B; Lasnon C; Licaj I; Thomas G; Do P; Guizard AV; Desmonts C; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Feb; 46(2):421-428. PubMed ID: 30218317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. EARL compliance and imaging optimisation on the Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT using phantom and clinical data.
van Sluis J; van Snick JH; Brouwers AH; Noordzij W; Dierckx RAJO; Borra RJH; Slart RHJA; Lammertsma AA; Glaudemans AWJM; Boellaard R; Tsoumpas C
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Nov; 49(13):4652-4660. PubMed ID: 35876867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital PET compliance to EARL accreditation specifications.
Koopman D; Groot Koerkamp M; Jager PL; Arkies H; Knollema S; Slump CH; Sanches PG; van Dalen JA
EJNMMI Phys; 2017 Dec; 4(1):9. PubMed ID: 28144857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How to harmonize SUVs obtained by hybrid PET/CT scanners with and without point spread function correction.
Ferretti A; Chondrogiannis S; Rampin L; Bellan E; Marzola MC; Grassetto G; Gusella S; Maffione AM; Gava M; Rubello D
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(23):235010. PubMed ID: 30474620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Generating harmonized SUV within the EANM EARL accreditation program: software approach versus EARL-compliant reconstruction.
Lasnon C; Salomon T; Desmonts C; Dô P; Oulkhouir Y; Madelaine J; Aide N
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Feb; 31(2):125-134. PubMed ID: 27812791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Protocols for Harmonized Quantification and Noise Reduction in Low-Dose Oncologic
Machado MAD; Menezes VO; Namías M; Vieira NS; Queiroz CC; Matheoud R; Alessio AM; Oliveira ML
J Nucl Med Technol; 2019 Mar; 47(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 30076252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multicentre quantitative
Huizing DMV; Koopman D; van Dalen JA; Gotthardt M; Boellaard R; Sera T; Sinaasappel M; Stokkel MPM; de Wit-van der Veen BJ
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Nov; 6(1):19. PubMed ID: 31705215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Harmonizing FDG PET quantification while maintaining optimal lesion detection: prospective multicentre validation in 517 oncology patients.
Quak E; Le Roux PY; Hofman MS; Robin P; Bourhis D; Callahan J; Binns D; Desmonts C; Salaun PY; Hicks RJ; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(13):2072-82. PubMed ID: 26219870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of point spread function modelling and time of flight on FDG uptake measurements in lung lesions using alternative filtering strategies.
Armstrong IS; Kelly MD; Williams HA; Matthews JC
EJNMMI Phys; 2014 Dec; 1(1):99. PubMed ID: 26501457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New standards for phantom image quality and SUV harmonization range for multicenter oncology PET studies.
Akamatsu G; Shimada N; Matsumoto K; Daisaki H; Suzuki K; Watabe H; Oda K; Senda M; Terauchi T; Tateishi U
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Feb; 36(2):144-161. PubMed ID: 35029817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of PET/CT system, reconstruction protocol, data analysis method, and repositioning on PET/CT precision: An experimental evaluation using an oncology and brain phantom.
Mansor S; Pfaehler E; Heijtel D; Lodge MA; Boellaard R; Yaqub M
Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6413-6424. PubMed ID: 28994465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Physical performance of the new hybrid PET∕CT Discovery-690.
Bettinardi V; Presotto L; Rapisarda E; Picchio M; Gianolli L; Gilardi MC
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5394-411. PubMed ID: 21992359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A multicentre comparison of quantitative (90)Y PET/CT for dosimetric purposes after radioembolization with resin microspheres : The QUEST Phantom Study.
Willowson KP; Tapner M; ; Bailey DL
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Jul; 42(8):1202-22. PubMed ID: 25967868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Harmonization of PET image reconstruction parameters in simultaneous PET/MRI.
Laforest R; Khalighi M; Natsuaki Y; Rajagopal A; Chandramohan D; Byrd D; An H; Larson P; James SS; Sunderland JJ; Kinahan PE; Hope TA
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Nov; 8(1):75. PubMed ID: 34739621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of Point-Spread Function Modeling on PET Image Quality in Integrated PET/MR Hybrid Imaging.
Aklan B; Oehmigen M; Beiderwellen K; Ruhlmann M; Paulus DH; Jakoby BW; Ritt P; Quick HH
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 57(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 26471697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
