These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29500879)

  • 1. A penalized likelihood method for multi-group structural equation modelling.
    Huang PH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Nov; 71(3):499-522. PubMed ID: 29500879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Penalized Likelihood Method for Structural Equation Modeling.
    Huang PH; Chen H; Weng LJ
    Psychometrika; 2017 Jun; 82(2):329-354. PubMed ID: 28417228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Penalized Least Squares for Structural Equation Modeling with Ordinal Responses.
    Huang PH
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(2-3):279-297. PubMed ID: 32990059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Multilevel Structural Equation Models with Random Slopes for Latent Covariates.
    Rockwood NJ
    Psychometrika; 2020 Jun; 85(2):275-300. PubMed ID: 32303976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two-Stage maximum likelihood estimation in the misspecified restricted latent class model.
    Wang S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):300-333. PubMed ID: 29080215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploratory Procedure for Component-Based Structural Equation Modeling for Simple Structure by Simultaneous Rotation.
    Yamashita N
    Psychometrika; 2024 Jun; 89(2):411-438. PubMed ID: 38085454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pairwise Likelihood Ratio Tests and Model Selection Criteria for Structural Equation Models with Ordinal Variables.
    Katsikatsou M; Moustaki I
    Psychometrika; 2016 Dec; 81(4):1046-1068. PubMed ID: 27734296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian generalized structured component analysis.
    Choi JY; Hwang H
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 May; 73(2):347-373. PubMed ID: 31049946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single- and Multiple-Group Penalized Factor Analysis: A Trust-Region Algorithm Approach with Integrated Automatic Multiple Tuning Parameter Selection.
    Geminiani E; Marra G; Moustaki I
    Psychometrika; 2021 Mar; 86(1):65-95. PubMed ID: 33768403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Profile Likelihood-Based Confidence Intervals and Regions for Structural Equation Models.
    Pek J; Wu H
    Psychometrika; 2015 Dec; 80(4):1123-45. PubMed ID: 25925009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Generalized Network Psychometrics: Combining Network and Latent Variable Models.
    Epskamp S; Rhemtulla M; Borsboom D
    Psychometrika; 2017 Dec; 82(4):904-927. PubMed ID: 28290111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Structural Equation Modeling of Social Networks: Specification, Estimation, and Application.
    Liu H; Jin IH; Zhang Z
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(5):714-730. PubMed ID: 30477339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating Factorial Invariance: An Interval Estimation Approach Using Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling.
    Shi D; Song H; DiStefano C; Maydeu-Olivares A; McDaniel HL; Jiang Z
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(2):224-245. PubMed ID: 30569738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximum likelihood estimation of a social relations structural equation model.
    Nestler S; Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A
    Psychometrika; 2020 Dec; 85(4):870-889. PubMed ID: 33094388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. EM algorithm estimation of a structural equation model for the longitudinal study of the quality of life.
    Barbieri A; Tami M; Bry X; Azria D; Gourgou S; Bascoul-Mollevi C; Lavergne C
    Stat Med; 2018 Mar; 37(6):1031-1046. PubMed ID: 29250835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semiparametric Factor Analysis for Item-Level Response Time Data.
    Liu Y; Wang W
    Psychometrika; 2022 Jun; 87(2):666-692. PubMed ID: 35098450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Approximations to the distribution of a test statistic in covariance structure analysis: A comprehensive study.
    Wu H
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):334-362. PubMed ID: 29086416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correction for Item Response Theory Latent Trait Measurement Error in Linear Mixed Effects Models.
    Wang C; Xu G; Zhang X
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):673-700. PubMed ID: 31183670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maximum likelihood estimation in meta-analytic structural equation modeling.
    Oort FJ; Jak S
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):156-67. PubMed ID: 27286901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When and how to use set-exploratory structural equation modelling to test structural models: A tutorial using the R package lavaan.
    Marsh H; Alamer A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2024 Nov; 77(3):459-476. PubMed ID: 38361388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.