These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29501448)

  • 1. Improving the food waste composting facilities site selection for sustainable development using a hybrid modified MADM model.
    Liu KM; Lin SH; Hsieh JC; Tzeng GH
    Waste Manag; 2018 May; 75():44-59. PubMed ID: 29501448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identification of key factors in consumers' adoption behavior of intelligent medical terminals based on a hybrid modified MADM model for product improvement.
    Liu Y; Chen Y; Tzeng GH
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Sep; 105():68-82. PubMed ID: 28750913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment and improvement of wetlands environmental protection plans for achieving sustainable development.
    Chen VY; Lin JC; Tzeng GH
    Environ Res; 2019 Feb; 169():280-296. PubMed ID: 30497003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of TOPSIS and VIKOR improved versions in a multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management model.
    Aghajani Mir M; Taherei Ghazvinei P; Sulaiman NM; Basri NE; Saheri S; Mahmood NZ; Jahan A; Begum RA; Aghamohammadi N
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 166():109-15. PubMed ID: 26496840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of ANP and DEMATEL to evaluate the decision-making of municipal solid waste management in Metro Manila.
    Tseng ML
    Environ Monit Assess; 2009 Sep; 156(1-4):181-97. PubMed ID: 18670898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using an innovative criteria weighting tool for stakeholders involvement to rank MSW facility sites with the AHP.
    De Feo G; De Gisi S
    Waste Manag; 2010 Nov; 30(11):2370-82. PubMed ID: 20444589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The application of a multi-parameter analysis in choosing the location of a new solid waste landfill in Serbia.
    Milosevic I; Naunovic Z
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 Oct; 31(10):1019-27. PubMed ID: 23853238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comprehensive multi-criteria decision making-based land capability assessment for municipal solid waste landfill sitting.
    Soroudi M; Omrani G; Moataar F; Jozi SA
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Oct; 25(28):27877-27889. PubMed ID: 30056542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Proposal for the integration of decentralised composting of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste into the waste management system of Cuba.
    Körner I; Saborit-Sánchez I; Aguilera-Corrales Y
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 17321124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multi-objective model for sustainable recycling of municipal solid waste.
    Mirdar Harijani A; Mansour S; Karimi B
    Waste Manag Res; 2017 Apr; 35(4):387-399. PubMed ID: 28367756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selection of healthcare waste disposal firms using a multi-method approach.
    Chauhan A; Singh SP
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Oct; 295():113117. PubMed ID: 34214788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A two-stage multi-attribute decision-making model for selecting appropriate locations of waste transfer stations in urban centers.
    Yadav V; Kalbar PP; Karmakar S; Dikshit AK
    Waste Manag; 2020 Aug; 114():80-88. PubMed ID: 32659690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An Analytic Network Process approach for siting a municipal solid waste plant in the Metropolitan Area of Valencia (Spain).
    Aragonés-Beltrán P; Pastor-Ferrando JP; García-García F; Pascual-Agulló A
    J Environ Manage; 2010 May; 91(5):1071-86. PubMed ID: 20080331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Best-compromise solutions for waste management: Decision support system for policymaking.
    Boffardi R; De Simone L; De Pascale A; Ioppolo G; Arbolino R
    Waste Manag; 2021 Feb; 121():441-451. PubMed ID: 33450650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Life cycle inventory for municipal solid waste management.
    Wilson EJ
    Waste Manag Res; 2002 Feb; 20(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 12020091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Solid waste facilities location using of analytical network process and data envelopment analysis approaches.
    Khadivi MR; Fatemi Ghomi SM
    Waste Manag; 2012 Jun; 32(6):1258-65. PubMed ID: 22382043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sustainable waste disposal technology selection: The stratified best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method.
    Torkayesh AE; Malmir B; Rajabi Asadabadi M
    Waste Manag; 2021 Mar; 122():100-112. PubMed ID: 33508530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Green material selection for sustainability: A hybrid MCDM approach.
    Zhang H; Peng Y; Tian G; Wang D; Xie P
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177578. PubMed ID: 28498864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Life cycle inventory for municipal solid waste management. Part 2: MSW management scenarios and modeling.
    Wilson EJ
    Waste Manag Res; 2002 Feb; 20(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 12020093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a decision model for the techno-economic assessment of municipal solid waste utilization pathways.
    Khan MM; Jain S; Vaezi M; Kumar A
    Waste Manag; 2016 Feb; 48():548-564. PubMed ID: 26496882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.