235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29501474)
1. Factors associated with non-participation in cervical cancer screening - A nationwide study of nearly half a million women in Denmark.
Harder E; Juul KE; Jensen SM; Thomsen LT; Frederiksen K; Kjaer SK
Prev Med; 2018 Jun; 111():94-100. PubMed ID: 29501474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Participation in cervical cancer screening among immigrants and Danish-born women in Denmark.
Hertzum-Larsen R; Kjær SK; Frederiksen K; Thomsen LT
Prev Med; 2019 Jun; 123():55-64. PubMed ID: 30796926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identifying specific non-attending groups in breast cancer screening--population-based registry study of participation and socio-demography.
Jensen LF; Pedersen AF; Andersen B; Vedsted P
BMC Cancer; 2012 Nov; 12():518. PubMed ID: 23151053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictors of non-participation in cervical screening in Denmark.
Kristensson JH; Sander BB; von Euler-Chelpin M; Lynge E
Cancer Epidemiol; 2014 Apr; 38(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 24447699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Socio-economic and demographic determinants affecting participation in the Swedish cervical screening program: A population-based case-control study.
Broberg G; Wang J; Östberg AL; Adolfsson A; Nemes S; Sparén P; Strander B
PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190171. PubMed ID: 29320536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determinants for Participation in Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling among Nonattenders to Cervical Cancer Screening in Denmark.
Harder E; Thomsen LT; Hertzum-Larsen R; Albieri V; Hessner MV; Juul KE; Bonde J; Frederiksen K; Kjaer SK
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2018 Nov; 27(11):1342-1351. PubMed ID: 30108095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-participation in cervical cancer screening according to health, lifestyle and sexual behavior: A population-based study of nearly 15,000 Danish women aged 23-45 years.
Harder E; Hertzum-Larsen R; Frederiksen K; Kjær SK; Thomsen LT
Prev Med; 2020 Aug; 137():106119. PubMed ID: 32387298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Invitation to cervical cancer screening does increase participation in Germany: Results from the MARZY study.
Radde K; Gottschalk A; Bussas U; Schülein S; Schriefer D; Seifert U; Neumann A; Kaiser M; Blettner M; Klug SJ
Int J Cancer; 2016 Sep; 139(5):1018-30. PubMed ID: 27083776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Disparities in cervical screening participation: a comparison of Russian, Somali and Kurdish immigrants with the general Finnish population.
Idehen EE; Koponen P; Härkänen T; Kangasniemi M; Pietilä AM; Korhonen T
Int J Equity Health; 2018 May; 17(1):56. PubMed ID: 29728104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of an Intervention in General Practice to Increase the Participation of Immigrants in Cervical Cancer Screening: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.
Møen KA; Kumar B; Igland J; Diaz E
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Apr; 3(4):e201903. PubMed ID: 32236530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-participation in screening: the case of cervical cancer in Denmark.
Dugué PA; Lynge E; Bjerregaard B; Rebolj M
Prev Med; 2012; 54(3-4):266-9. PubMed ID: 22300964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A primary healthcare-based intervention to improve a Danish cervical cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
Jensen H; Svanholm H; Støvring H; Bro F
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2009 Jul; 63(7):510-5. PubMed ID: 19228681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors associated with participation of Korean women in cervical cancer screening examination by age group.
Lee M; Chang HS; Park EC; Yu SH; Sohn M; Lee SG
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(6):1457-62. PubMed ID: 22126481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of opportunistic testing in a systematic cervical cancer screening program: a nationwide registry study.
Tranberg M; Larsen MB; Mikkelsen EM; Svanholm H; Andersen B
BMC Public Health; 2015 Jul; 15():681. PubMed ID: 26194007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Barriers to cervical cancer screening faced by immigrants: a registry-based study of 1.4 million women in Norway.
Leinonen MK; Campbell S; Ursin G; Tropé A; Nygård M
Eur J Public Health; 2017 Oct; 27(5):873-879. PubMed ID: 28957477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Population-based organized cervical cancer screening pilot program in France.
Hamers FF; Duport N; Beltzer N
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2018 Sep; 27(5):486-492. PubMed ID: 28362653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences in cervical cancer screening between immigrants and nonimmigrants in Norway: a primary healthcare register-based study.
Møen KA; Kumar B; Qureshi S; Diaz E
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2017 Nov; 26(6):521-527. PubMed ID: 27749381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors associated with cervical cancer screening participation among immigrants of Russian, Somali and Kurdish origin: a population-based study in Finland.
Idehen EE; Korhonen T; Castaneda A; Juntunen T; Kangasniemi M; Pietilä AM; Koponen P
BMC Womens Health; 2017 Mar; 17(1):19. PubMed ID: 28284203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Follow-up after abnormal cervical cancer screening in immigrants compared with Danish-born women - A nationwide register study.
Hertzum-Larsen R; Kjær SK; Frederiksen K; Thomsen LT
Prev Med; 2021 Dec; 153():106776. PubMed ID: 34450191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does mammogram attendance influence participation in cervical and colorectal cancer screening? A prospective study among 1856 French women.
Bertaut A; Coudert J; Bengrine L; Dancourt V; Binquet C; Douvier S
PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0198939. PubMed ID: 29927995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
