127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29501957)
1. ADC at 3.0 T as a noninvasive biomarker for preoperative prediction of Ki67 expression in invasive ductal carcinoma of breast.
Shen L; Zhou G; Tong T; Tang F; Lin Y; Zhou J; Wang Y; Zong G; Zhang L
Clin Imaging; 2018; 52():16-22. PubMed ID: 29501957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Invasive ductal breast cancer: preoperative predict Ki-67 index based on radiomics of ADC maps.
Zhang Y; Zhu Y; Zhang K; Liu Y; Cui J; Tao J; Wang Y; Wang S
Radiol Med; 2020 Feb; 125(2):109-116. PubMed ID: 31696388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Apparent diffusion coefficient on 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and prognostic factors in breast cancer.
De Felice C; Cipolla V; Guerrieri D; Santucci D; Musella A; Porfiri LM; Meggiorini ML
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2014; 35(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 25118482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0t: Correlation with prognostic factors and subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma.
Kim EJ; Kim SH; Park GE; Kang BJ; Song BJ; Kim YJ; Lee D; Ahn H; Kim I; Son YH; Grimm R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(6):1666-78. PubMed ID: 25919239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values of invasive ductal carcinoma and pathologic factors on diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 Tesla.
Park SH; Choi HY; Hahn SY
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jan; 41(1):175-82. PubMed ID: 24353241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tumor apparent diffusion coefficient as an imaging biomarker to predict tumor aggressiveness in patients with estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer.
Shin HJ; Kim SH; Lee HJ; Gong G; Baek S; Chae EY; Choi WJ; Cha JH; Kim HH
NMR Biomed; 2016 Aug; 29(8):1070-8. PubMed ID: 27332719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of perfusion parameters on DCE-MRI and ADC values on DWMRI for invasive ductal carcinoma at 3.0 Tesla.
Liu F; Wang M; Li H
World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 16(1):239. PubMed ID: 30577820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation between 3T apparent diffusion coefficient values and grading of invasive breast carcinoma.
Cipolla V; Santucci D; Guerrieri D; Drudi FM; Meggiorini ML; de Felice C
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Dec; 83(12):2144-2150. PubMed ID: 25305145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MR mammography using diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluating breast cancer: a correlation with proliferation index.
Molinari C; Clauser P; Girometti R; Linda A; Cimino E; Puglisi F; Zuiani C; Bazzocchi M
Radiol Med; 2015 Oct; 120(10):911-8. PubMed ID: 25776017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Histogram analysis of volume-based apparent diffusion coefficient in breast cancer.
Park GE; Kim SH; Kim EJ; Kang BJ; Park MS
Acta Radiol; 2017 Nov; 58(11):1294-1302. PubMed ID: 28273747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Added value of mean and entropy of apparent diffusion coefficient values for evaluating histologic phenotypes of invasive ductal breast cancer with MR imaging.
Suo S; Zhang D; Cheng F; Cao M; Hua J; Lu J; Xu J
Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1425-1434. PubMed ID: 30116958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Apparent diffusion coefficient in estrogen receptor-positive and lymph node-negative invasive breast cancers at 3.0T DW-MRI: A potential predictor for an oncotype Dx test recurrence score.
Thakur SB; Durando M; Milans S; Cho GY; Gennaro L; Sutton EJ; Giri D; Morris EA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 47(2):401-409. PubMed ID: 28640531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early-stage invasive ductal carcinoma: Association of tumor apparent diffusion coefficient values with axillary lymph node metastasis.
Kim JY; Seo HB; Park S; Moon JI; Lee JW; Lee NK; Lee SW; Bae YT
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Nov; 84(11):2137-43. PubMed ID: 26318821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Association among T2 signal intensity, necrosis, ADC and Ki-67 in estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative invasive ductal carcinoma.
Kim SY; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Koo JS; Kim SG; Kim MJ
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Dec; 54():176-182. PubMed ID: 30172938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Luminal-type breast cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficients with the Ki-67 labeling index.
Mori N; Ota H; Mugikura S; Takasawa C; Ishida T; Watanabe G; Tada H; Watanabe M; Takase K; Takahashi S
Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 25203132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of the differences in the apparent diffusion coefficient values in different histopathological types of malignant breast lesions and comparison of cellular region/ stroma ratio and histopathological results.
Köremezli Keskin N; Balcı P; Başara Akın I; Yavuz Gürkan E; Sevinç Aİ; Durak MG; Erşen Danyeli A
Turk J Med Sci; 2018 Aug; 48(4):817-825. PubMed ID: 30119158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic performance of minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value in differentiating the invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma
Zhao S; Shao G; Chen P; Li L; Yang Y; Zhao X; Guo W
J Cancer Res Ther; 2019; 15(4):871-875. PubMed ID: 31436245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficiency values on diffusion-weighted imaging with prognostic factors for breast cancer.
Choi SY; Chang YW; Park HJ; Kim HJ; Hong SS; Seo DY
Br J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 85(1016):e474-9. PubMed ID: 22128125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diffusion-weighted imaging and (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer: Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient and maximum standardized uptake values with prognostic factors.
Karan B; Pourbagher A; Torun N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1434-44. PubMed ID: 26663655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Invasive ductal carcinoma: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient value with pathological prognostic factors.
Razek AA; Gaballa G; Denewer A; Nada N
NMR Biomed; 2010 Jul; 23(6):619-23. PubMed ID: 20232453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
