These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29502009)

  • 1. The role of visual experience in the emergence of cross-modal correspondences.
    Hamilton-Fletcher G; Pisanski K; Reby D; Stefańczyk M; Ward J; Sorokowska A
    Cognition; 2018 Jun; 175():114-121. PubMed ID: 29502009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of cross-modal correspondences on working memory performance.
    Brunetti R; Indraccolo A; Mastroberardino S; Spence C; Santangelo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):819-831. PubMed ID: 28345948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-sensory correspondences and symbolism in spoken and written language.
    Walker P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1339-61. PubMed ID: 26913934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional Preference for Object Sounds and Voices in the Brain of Early Blind and Sighted Individuals.
    Dormal G; Pelland M; Rezk M; Yakobov E; Lepore F; Collignon O
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Jan; 30(1):86-106. PubMed ID: 28891782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changing pitch of sounds alters perceived visual motion trajectory.
    Takeshima Y; Gyoba J
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(4):317-32. PubMed ID: 24319926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-sensory correspondences and cross talk between dimensions of connotative meaning: visual angularity is hard, high-pitched, and bright.
    Walker P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Nov; 74(8):1792-809. PubMed ID: 22833281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Sweet Voice: The Influence of Cross-Modal Correspondences Between Taste and Vocal Pitch on Advertising Effectiveness.
    Motoki K; Saito T; Nouchi R; Kawashima R; Sugiura M
    Multisens Res; 2019 Jan; 32(4-5):401-427. PubMed ID: 31163401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the Relative Nature of (Pitch-Based) Crossmodal Correspondences.
    Spence C
    Multisens Res; 2019 Jan; 32(3):235-265. PubMed ID: 31059485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Synesthesia strengthens sound-symbolic cross-modal correspondences.
    Lacey S; Martinez M; McCormick K; Sathian K
    Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 44(9):2716-2721. PubMed ID: 27564319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early but not late-blindness leads to enhanced auditory perception.
    Wan CY; Wood AG; Reutens DC; Wilson SJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(1):344-8. PubMed ID: 19703481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are crossmodal correspondences relative or absolute? Sequential effects on speeded classification.
    Brunetti R; Indraccolo A; Del Gatto C; Spence C; Santangelo V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):527-534. PubMed ID: 29116614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deaf, blind or deaf-blind: Is touch enhanced?
    Papagno C; Cecchetto C; Pisoni A; Bolognini N
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 234(2):627-36. PubMed ID: 26573575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Categorical representation from sound and sight in the ventral occipito-temporal cortex of sighted and blind.
    Mattioni S; Rezk M; Battal C; Bottini R; Cuculiza Mendoza KE; Oosterhof NN; Collignon O
    Elife; 2020 Feb; 9():. PubMed ID: 32108572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Summation of visual attributes in auditory-visual crossmodal correspondences.
    Jonas C; Spiller MJ; Hibbard P
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1104-1112. PubMed ID: 28695529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temperature-Based Crossmodal Correspondences: Causes and Consequences.
    Spence C
    Multisens Res; 2020 Oct; 33(6):645-682. PubMed ID: 31923885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Audio-Visual, Visuo-Tactile and Audio-Tactile Correspondences in Preschoolers.
    Nava E; Grassi M; Turati C
    Multisens Res; 2016; 29(1-3):93-111. PubMed ID: 27311292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do small white balls squeak? Pitch-object correspondences in young children.
    Mondloch CJ; Maurer D
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 4(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 15460920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differentiated audio-tactile correspondences in sighted and blind individuals.
    Deroy O; Fasiello I; Hayward V; Auvray M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1204-14. PubMed ID: 26950385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peripheral sounds elicit stronger activity in contralateral occipital cortex in blind than sighted individuals.
    Amadeo MB; Störmer VS; Campus C; Gori M
    Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):11637. PubMed ID: 31406158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Synaesthetic interactions across vision and audition.
    Krugliak A; Noppeney U
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 88():65-73. PubMed ID: 26427739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.