300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29502480)
1. Postsurgical Treatment of Split Skin Graft Donor Sites in Dermatological Departments.
Jansen P; Stoffels I; Klode J; Jockenhöfer F; Augustin M; Schadendorf D; Dissemond J
Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2018 Mar; 17(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 29502480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of an oxygen-diffusion dressing for accelerated healing of donor-site wounds.
Lairet KF; Baer D; Leas ML; Renz EM; Cancio LC
J Burn Care Res; 2014; 35(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 23877142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adhesive retention dressings are more comfortable than alginate dressings on split skin graft donor sites--a randomised controlled trial.
Giele H; Tong A; Huddleston S
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2001 Nov; 83(6):431-4. PubMed ID: 11777142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Repair of the donor areas defects after split-thickness skin grafts utilizing an advanced epithelialization dressing.
Fanti PA; Dika E; Vaccari S; Misciali C; Ismaili A; Barisani A; Patrizi A
J Dermatolog Treat; 2014 Oct; 25(5):434-7. PubMed ID: 23215535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of honey as an adjunct in the healing of split-thickness skin graft donor site.
Misirlioglu A; Eroglu S; Karacaoglan N; Akan M; Akoz T; Yildirim S
Dermatol Surg; 2003 Feb; 29(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 12562348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Management of split-thickness skin graft donor site: a prospective clinical trial for comparison of five different dressing materials.
Demirtas Y; Yagmur C; Soylemez F; Ozturk N; Demir A
Burns; 2010 Nov; 36(7):999-1005. PubMed ID: 20381967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adhesive retention dressings are more comfortable than alginate dressings on split-skin-graft donor sites.
Hormbrey E; Pandya A; Giele H
Br J Plast Surg; 2003 Jul; 56(5):498-503. PubMed ID: 12890465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of donor-site healing under Xeroform and Jelonet dressings: unexpected findings.
Malpass KG; Snelling CF; Tron V
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Aug; 112(2):430-9. PubMed ID: 12900600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The ideal split-thickness skin graft donor-site dressing: a clinical comparative trial of a modified polyurethane dressing and aquacel.
Dornseifer U; Lonic D; Gerstung TI; Herter F; Fichter AM; Holm C; Schuster T; Ninkovic M
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Oct; 128(4):918-924. PubMed ID: 21681125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical potential of a silk sericin-releasing bioactive wound dressing for the treatment of split-thickness skin graft donor sites.
Siritientong T; Angspatt A; Ratanavaraporn J; Aramwit P
Pharm Res; 2014 Jan; 31(1):104-16. PubMed ID: 23900888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Silver-coated nylon dressing plus active DC microcurrent for healing of autogenous skin donor sites.
Malin EW; Galin CM; Lairet KF; Huzar TF; Williams JF; Renz EM; Wolf SE; Cancio LC
Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(5):481-4. PubMed ID: 23903090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hemicellulose dressing versus rayon dressing in the re-epithelialization of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a multicenter study.
Ferreira LM; Blanes L; Gragnani A; Veiga DF; Veiga FP; Nery GB; Rocha GH; Gomes HC; Rocha MG; Okamoto R
J Tissue Viability; 2009 Aug; 18(3):88-94. PubMed ID: 19596580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a comparative study of two absorbent dressings.
Terrill PJ; Goh RC; Bailey MJ
J Wound Care; 2007 Nov; 16(10):433-8. PubMed ID: 18065019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Full-thickness skin grafts: maximizing graft take using negative pressure dressings to prepare the graft bed.
Landau AG; Hudson DA; Adams K; Geldenhuys S; Pienaar C
Ann Plast Surg; 2008 Jun; 60(6):661-6. PubMed ID: 18520204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nanofibrillar cellulose wound dressing in skin graft donor site treatment.
Hakkarainen T; Koivuniemi R; Kosonen M; Escobedo-Lucea C; Sanz-Garcia A; Vuola J; Valtonen J; Tammela P; Mäkitie A; Luukko K; Yliperttula M; Kavola H
J Control Release; 2016 Dec; 244(Pt B):292-301. PubMed ID: 27491880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical Evaluation of Wound Healing in Split-Skin Graft Donor Sites Using Microscopic Quantification of Reepithelialization.
Wehrens KM; Arnoldussen CW; Booi DI; van der Hulst RR
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2016 Jun; 29(6):254-60. PubMed ID: 27171253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An evidence-based review of split-thickness skin graft donor site dressings.
Brown JE; Holloway SL
Int Wound J; 2018 Dec; 15(6):1000-1009. PubMed ID: 30117716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Split-skin graft in the management of diabetic foot ulcers.
Mahmoud SM; Mohamed AA; Mahdi SE; Ahmed ME
J Wound Care; 2008 Jul; 17(7):303-6. PubMed ID: 18705232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A controlled subatmospheric pressure dressing increases the rate of skin graft donor site reepithelialization.
Genecov DG; Schneider AM; Morykwas MJ; Parker D; White WL; Argenta LC
Ann Plast Surg; 1998 Mar; 40(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 9523602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lower donor site morbidity and higher patient satisfaction with epidermal grafting in comparison to split thickness skin grafting: A randomized controlled trial (EPIGRAAFT Trial).
Kanapathy M; Bystrzonowski N; Hachach-Haram N; Twyman L; Becker DL; Richards T; Mosahebi A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Aug; 73(8):1556-1564. PubMed ID: 32532631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
