138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29502700)
1. Editorial Commentary: Shoulder Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Significantly Increases the Humeral Fracture Risk-Is This a Reason to Look for Alternatives?
Hohmann E
Arthroscopy; 2018 Mar; 34(3):814-815. PubMed ID: 29502700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis With PEEK Interference Screw: A Biomechanical Analysis of Humeral Fracture Risk.
Mellano CR; Frank RM; Shin JJ; Jain A; Zuke WA; Mascarenhas R; Shewman E; Cole BJ; Romeo AA; Verma NN; Forsythe B
Arthroscopy; 2018 Mar; 34(3):806-813. PubMed ID: 29287950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Torsional Fracture of the Humerus after Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis with an Interference Screw: A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study.
Beason DP; Shah JP; Duckett JW; Jost PW; Fleisig GS; Cain EL
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Nov; 30(9):915-20. PubMed ID: 26255072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical analysis of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: effect of screw malpositioning on proximal humeral strength.
Euler SA; Smith SD; Williams BT; Dornan GJ; Millett PJ; Wijdicks CA
Am J Sports Med; 2015 Jan; 43(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 25371439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical Evaluation of Humerus Fracture After Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis With Interference Screw Versus Unicortical Button.
Khalid MA; Morris RP; Black N; Maassen NH
Arthroscopy; 2020 May; 36(5):1253-1260. PubMed ID: 31973991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical Analysis of All-Suture Suture Anchor Fixation Compared With Conventional Suture Anchors and Interference Screws for Biceps Tenodesis.
Frank RM; Bernardoni ED; Veera SS; Waterman BR; Griffin JW; Shewman EF; Cole BJ; Romeo AA; Verma NN
Arthroscopy; 2019 Jun; 35(6):1760-1768. PubMed ID: 31072716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical evaluation of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: dual suture anchor versus interference screw fixation.
Tashjian RZ; Henninger HB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Oct; 22(10):1408-12. PubMed ID: 23415819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis of the Shoulder: Indications and Technique Options.
Nuelle CW; Sheean A; Tucker CJ
Arthroscopy; 2020 Sep; 36(9):2352-2353. PubMed ID: 32325099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical characterization of unicortical button fixation: a novel technique for proximal subpectoral biceps tenodesis.
DeAngelis JP; Chen A; Wexler M; Hertz B; Grimaldi Bournissaint L; Nazarian A; Ramappa AJ
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2015 May; 23(5):1434-1441. PubMed ID: 24253375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anatomic and radiographic comparison of arthroscopic suprapectoral and open subpectoral biceps tenodesis sites.
Johannsen AM; Macalena JA; Carson EW; Tompkins M
Am J Sports Med; 2013 Dec; 41(12):2919-24. PubMed ID: 24057029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Editorial Commentary: Biceps Tenodesis Fixation: Screw, Button, or None of the Above?
Frank RM
Arthroscopy; 2020 May; 36(5):1261-1263. PubMed ID: 32370888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical evaluation of a unicortical button versus interference screw for subpectoral biceps tenodesis.
Arora AS; Singh A; Koonce RC
Arthroscopy; 2013 Apr; 29(4):638-44. PubMed ID: 23395466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Editorial Commentary: Does Size Matter: Drill Holes in Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis?
Gilmer BB
Arthroscopy; 2017 Aug; 33(8):1503-1505. PubMed ID: 28779798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of interference screw depth on fixation strength in biceps tenodesis.
Salata MJ; Bailey JR; Bell R; Frank RM; McGill KC; Lin EC; Kercher JS; Wang VM; Provencher MT; Mazzocca AD; Verma NN; Romeo AA
Arthroscopy; 2014 Jan; 30(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 24183106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Arthroscopic suprapectoral and open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a comparison of restoration of length-tension and mechanical strength between techniques.
Werner BC; Lyons ML; Evans CL; Griffin JW; Hart JM; Miller MD; Brockmeier SF
Arthroscopy; 2015 Apr; 31(4):620-7. PubMed ID: 25498870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical comparison of intramedullary cortical button fixation and interference screw technique for subpectoral biceps tenodesis.
Buchholz A; Martetschläger F; Siebenlist S; Sandmann GH; Hapfelmeier A; Lenich A; Millett PJ; Stöckle U; Elser F
Arthroscopy; 2013 May; 29(5):845-53. PubMed ID: 23587927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical performance of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a comparison of interference screw fixation, cortical button fixation, and interference screw diameter.
Sethi PM; Rajaram A; Beitzel K; Hackett TR; Chowaniec DM; Mazzocca AD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Apr; 22(4):451-7. PubMed ID: 22743072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical comparison of long head of biceps tenodesis with interference screw and biceps sling soft tissue techniques.
Ahmed M; Young BT; Bledsoe G; Cutuk A; Kaar SG
Arthroscopy; 2013 Jul; 29(7):1157-63. PubMed ID: 23725678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transfer of the long head of biceps to the conjoint tendon. A biomechanical study.
Pastor MF; Kraemer M; Hurschler C; Claassen L; Wellmann M; Smith T
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Feb; 32():80-4. PubMed ID: 26851565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implant-Free Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Is Biomechanically at Higher Risk of Spiral Fracture of the Humerus Compared With Implant-Free Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis.
Dini AA; Mizels JE; Sadeghpour S; O'Brien MJ; Savoie FH; Getelman MH
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil; 2021 Feb; 3(1):e73-e78. PubMed ID: 33615250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
