204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29503708)
1. Effects of abutment diameter, luting agent type, and re-cementation on the retention of implant-supported CAD/CAM metal copings over short abutments.
Safari S; Hosseini Ghavam F; Amini P; Yaghmaei K
J Adv Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 10(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 29503708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.
Mansour A; Ercoli C; Graser G; Tallents R; Moss M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug; 13(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12175370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retention of implant-supported zirconium oxide ceramic restorations using different luting agents.
Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Shahtoosi M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():20-4. PubMed ID: 22092303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of abutment modification and cement type on retention of cement-retained implant supported crowns.
Farzin M; Torabi K; Ahangari AH; Derafshi R
J Dent (Tehran); 2014 May; 11(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 25628660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of removal forces of implant-supported zirconia copings depending on abutment geometry, luting agent and cleaning method during re-cementation.
Rödiger M; Rinke S; Ehret-Kleinau F; Pohlmeyer F; Lange K; Bürgers R; Gersdorff N
J Adv Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 6(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 25006388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Undetected Excess Cement at Marginal Areas of Zirconia Crown Copings: In Vitro Analysis of Two Luting Agents and Their Influence on Retention.
Augusti D; Augusti G; Re D
Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(2):202-211. PubMed ID: 32069345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study.
Gehrke P; Bleuel K; Fischer C; Sader R
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):111. PubMed ID: 31200680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of abutment height and thermocycling on retrievability of cemented implant-supported crowns.
Mehl C; Harder S; Shahriari A; Steiner M; Kern M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):1106-15. PubMed ID: 23057023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retention of cemented zirconia copings on TiBase abutments.
Santos-Neto OS; Gonçalves LM; Maia-Filho EM; Malheiros AS; Firoozmand LM; Villis PC; Cardenas AF; Tavarez RR
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2021 Dec; 34(3):214-220. PubMed ID: 35088807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of Cement Type and Cementation Technique on the Retention of Implant-Supported Restorations.
Zeinabadi Z; Nami M; Naserkhaki M; Tavakolizadeh S
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2020; 30(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 33389917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant-supported metal copings: An in vitro study.
Ebadian B; Jowkar M; Davoudi A; Fathi A; Ziaei M; Berg E
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Aug; 8(4):1002-1007. PubMed ID: 35618682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
Dudley JE; Richards LC; Abbott JR
Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
Chee WW; Duncan J; Afshar M; Moshaverinia A
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retention of Implant Supported Metal Crowns Cemented with Different Luting Agents: A Comparative Invitro Study.
Kapoor R; Singh K; Kaur S; Arora A
J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Apr; 10(4):ZC61-4. PubMed ID: 27190954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retention Strength after Compressive Cyclic Loading of Five Luting Agents Used in Implant-Supported Prostheses.
Alvarez-Arenal A; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; deLlanos-Lanchares H; Brizuela-Velasco A; Pinés-Hueso J; Ellakuria-Echebarria J
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():2107027. PubMed ID: 27822468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of different methods of cleansing temporary cement (with and without eugenol) on the final bond strength of implant-supported zirconia copings after final cementation: An
Bajoghli F; Fathi A; Ebadian B; Jowkar M; Sabouhi M
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2023; 20():22. PubMed ID: 36960017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
