204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29503708)
21. The Effect of CAD/CAM Crown Material and Cement Type on Retention to Implant Abutments.
Lopes ACO; Machado CM; Bonjardim LR; Bergamo ETP; Ramalho IS; Witek L; Coelho PG; Bonfante EA
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e552-e556. PubMed ID: 29961986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation.
Mehl C; Harder S; Wolfart M; Kern M; Wolfart S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19040447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of internal-gap width and cement type on the retentive force of zirconia copings in pullout testing.
Son YH; Han CH; Kim S
J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):866-72. PubMed ID: 22819954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of the effect of surface roughness and modification of implant abutment axial wall on the retention of zirconium oxide copings before and after thermocycling.
Amini P; Hejazi M; Taghva M; Safari S
J Clin Exp Dent; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e399-e405. PubMed ID: 38725819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of surface treatment on the retention of implant-supported zirconia restorations over short abutments.
Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Jabbari E
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 24388717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
Garg P; Pujari M; Prithviraj DR; Khare S
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 25506659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of the Effect of Axial Wall Modification and Coping Design on the Retention of Cement-retained Implant-supported Crowns.
Derafshi R; Ahangari AH; Torabi K; Farzin M
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2015; 9(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 25973152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Laser retrieval of cemented zirconia single unit implant restoration: A pilot study: Part I - Force values.
Shah K; McGlumphy E; Lee DJ; Seghi RR; Sharples DS; Kim DG
Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(4):425–433. PubMed ID: 33662063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An
Sarfaraz H; Hassan A; Shenoy KK; Shetty M
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2019; 19(2):166-172. PubMed ID: 31040551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dislodgement Resistance of Zirconia Copings Cemented onto Zirconia and Titanium Abutments.
Güler U; Budak Y; Queiroz JRC; Özcan M
Implant Dent; 2017 Aug; 26(4):510-515. PubMed ID: 28383306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. In vitro comparisons of casting retention on implant abutments among commercially available and experimental castor oil-containing dental luting agents.
Pinelli LA; Fais LM; Ricci WA; Reis JM
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):319-24. PubMed ID: 23684282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of the Unfilled Space Size of the Abutment Screw Access Hole on the Extruded Excess Cement and Retention of Single Implant Zirconia Crowns.
Al-Johany SS; Al Amri MD; Al-Bakri AS; Al-Qarni MN
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):179-184. PubMed ID: 28102922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Effect of Compressive Cyclic Loading on the Retention of Cast Single Crowns Cemented to Implant Abutments.
Alvarez-Arenal A; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; Pinés-Hueso J; deLlanos-Lanchares H; del Rio Highsmith J
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):80-2. PubMed ID: 26757336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Retentiveness of implant-supported metal copings using different luting agents.
Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Ebrahimi M; Savabi G
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2012 Jan; 9(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 22363357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of Abutment Geometry and Luting Agents on the Vertical Marginal Discrepancy of Cast Copings on Implant Abutments: An In Vitro Study.
Rosas J; Mayta-Tovalino F; Malpartida-Carrillo V; Degregori AM; Mendoza R; Guerrero ME
Int J Dent; 2021; 2021():9950972. PubMed ID: 34239569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implant-supported crowns.
Covey DA; Kent DK; St Germain HA; Koka S
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 10709044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Retentive strength of two-piece CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutments.
Gehrke P; Alius J; Fischer C; Erdelt KJ; Beuer F
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 16(6):920-5. PubMed ID: 23527950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of precementation on minimizing residual cement around the marginal area of dental implants.
Wang W; Chang J; Wang HM; Gu XH
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Apr; 123(4):622-629. PubMed ID: 31383528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of cleaning methods on retentive values of saliva-contaminated implant-supported zirconia copings.
Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Savabi G; Razavi M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 May; 29(5):530-536. PubMed ID: 29656421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of modifying the screw access channels of zirconia implant abutment on the cement flow pattern and retention of zirconia restorations.
Wadhwani C; Chung KH
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 24680357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
