These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29503708)

  • 41. Retention of zirconia on titanium in two-piece abutments with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Mehl C; Zhang Q; Lehmann F; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):214-219. PubMed ID: 29627210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components.
    Squier RS; Agar JR; Duncan JP; Taylor TD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):793-8. PubMed ID: 11769829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
    Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of 3 luting agents on retention of implant-supported crowns on 2 different abutments.
    Güncü MB; Cakan U; Canay S
    Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 21811170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Assessment and comparison of retention of zirconia copings luted with different cements onto zirconia and titanium abutments: An in vitro study.
    Menon NS; Kumar GP; Jnanadev KR; Satish Babu CL; Shetty S
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2016; 16(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 27141162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Various Luting Cements on the Retention of Implant-Supported Metal Crowns.
    Mehta S; Kesari A; Tomar M; Sharma U; Sagar P; Nakum P; Rao K
    Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e41691. PubMed ID: 37575823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Influence of space size of abutment screw access channel on the amount of extruded excess cement and marginal accuracy of cement-retained single implant restorations.
    Al Amri MD; Al-Johany SS; Al-Qarni MN; Al-Bakri AS; Al-Maflehi NS; Abualsaud HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb; 119(2):263-269. PubMed ID: 28552289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of reduced airborne-particle abrasion pressure on the retention of zirconia copings resin bonded to titanium abutments.
    Hansen NA; Wille S; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):60-67. PubMed ID: 31703916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. An
    Ahsan A; Khushboo B; Kumar A; Kumari S; Poojary B; Dixit A; Kumar A; Badiyani BK
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2022 Jul; 14(Suppl 1):S541-S544. PubMed ID: 36110724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The effect of thermal cycling and air abrasion on cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Michalakis K; Pissiotis AL; Kang K; Hirayama H; Garefis PD; Petridis H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):569-74. PubMed ID: 17929517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Assessment of the tensile strength of hexagonal abutments using different cementing agents.
    Wahl C; França FM; Brito RB; Basting RT; Smanio H
    Braz Oral Res; 2008; 22(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 19148383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Retention of zirconia copings over smooth and airborne-particle-abraded titanium bases with different resin cements.
    Linkevicius T; Caplikas A; Dumbryte I; Linkeviciene L; Svediene O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jun; 121(6):949-954. PubMed ID: 30711294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The influence of different convergence angles and resin cements on the retention of zirconia copings.
    Ali AO; Kelly JR; Zandparsa R
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):614-21. PubMed ID: 22823334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Retentive strength of metal copings on prefabricated abutments with five different cements.
    Maeyama H; Sawase T; Jimbo R; Kamada K; Suketa N; Fukui J; Atsuta M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 16336914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of metallic copings luted with three different commercially available luting cements: An
    Handa M; Marya P; Gupta V; Chopra S
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2021; 21(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 33835069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Cement selection for cement-retained crown technique with dental implants.
    Sheets JL; Wilcox C; Wilwerding T
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):92-96. PubMed ID: 17971122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of Metal Extension of Crown in the Screw Access Channel of a Posterior Implant Abutment on the Retention of Cement Retained Prosthesis.
    Biyani R; Ali M; Belles D; Powers JM
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Oct; 41(5):537-41. PubMed ID: 23981084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Cementation Protocol for Bonding Zirconia Crowns to Titanium Base CAD/CAM Abutments.
    Zahoui A; Bergamo ET; Marun MM; Silva KP; Coelho PG; Bonfante EA
    Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(5):527-535. PubMed ID: 32956434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of the effect of implant abutment surface modifications on retention of implant-supported restoration with a polymer based cement.
    Sahu N; Lakshmi N; Azhagarasan NS; Agnihotri Y; Rajan M; Hariharan R
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Jan; 8(1):239-42. PubMed ID: 24596785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.