184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29504452)
1. Witnesses' memory for events and faces under elevated levels of intoxication.
Altman CM; Schreiber Compo N; McQuiston D; Hagsand AV; Cervera J
Memory; 2018 Aug; 26(7):946-959. PubMed ID: 29504452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Witness memory and alcohol: The effects of state-dependent recall.
Schreiber Compo N; Carol RN; Evans JR; Pimentel P; Holness H; Nichols-Lopez K; Rose S; Furton KG
Law Hum Behav; 2017 Apr; 41(2):202-215. PubMed ID: 27786509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The intoxicated co-witness: effects of alcohol and dyadic discussion on memory conformity and event recall.
Bartlett G; Gawrylowicz J; Frings D; Albery IP
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2021 Jun; 238(6):1485-1493. PubMed ID: 33566113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Witnesses stumbling down memory lane: The effects of alcohol intoxication, retention interval, and repeated interviewing.
Hagsand AV; Roos Af Hjelmsäter E; Granhag PA; Fahlke C; Söderpalm Gordh A
Memory; 2017 Apr; 25(4):531-543. PubMed ID: 27249626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bottled memories: on how alcohol affects eyewitness recall.
Hagsand A; Hjelmsäter ER; Granhag PA; Fahlke C; Söderpalm-Gordh A
Scand J Psychol; 2013 Jun; 54(3):188-95. PubMed ID: 23384077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of alcohol and co-witness information on memory reports: a field study.
Bartlett G; Albery IP; Frings D; Gawrylowicz J
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2022 Sep; 239(9):2945-2953. PubMed ID: 35764830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A preidentification questioning effect: serendipitously increasing correct rejections.
Dysart JE; Lindsay RC
Law Hum Behav; 2001 Apr; 25(2):155-65. PubMed ID: 11419380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interviewing intoxicated witnesses: Memory performance in theory and practice.
Hildebrand Karlén M
Scand J Psychol; 2018 Apr; 59(2):113-126. PubMed ID: 29152755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Alcohol-induced retrograde facilitation renders witnesses of crime less suggestible to misinformation.
Gawrylowicz J; Ridley AM; Albery IP; Barnoth E; Young J
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2017 Apr; 234(8):1267-1275. PubMed ID: 28214996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Witnessing-condition heterogeneity and witnesses' versus investigators' confidence in the accuracy of witnesses' identification decisions.
Lindsay DS; Nilsen E; Read JD
Law Hum Behav; 2000 Dec; 24(6):685-97. PubMed ID: 11105479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pre-identification confidence is related to eyewitness lineup identification accuracy across heterogeneous encoding conditions.
Molinaro PF; Charman SD; Wylie K
Law Hum Behav; 2021 Dec; 45(6):524-541. PubMed ID: 34661424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Blind sequential lineup administration reduces both false identifications and confidence in those false identifications.
Charman SD; Quiroz V
Law Hum Behav; 2016 Oct; 40(5):477-87. PubMed ID: 27227276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. To wait or not to wait? Improving results when interviewing intoxicated witnesses to violence.
Hildebrand Karlén M; Roos Af Hjelmsäter E; Fahlke C; Granhag PA; Söderpalm-Gordh A
Scand J Psychol; 2017 Feb; 58(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 28054379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy.
Steblay NK; Dietrich HL; Ryan SL; Raczynski JL; James KA
Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):262-74. PubMed ID: 20632113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors of eyewitness identification decisions from video lineups in England: a field study.
Horry R; Memon A; Wright DB; Milne R
Law Hum Behav; 2012 Aug; 36(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 22849411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving the identification accuracy of senior witnesses: do prelineup questions and sequential testing help?
Memon A; Gabbert F
J Appl Psychol; 2003 Apr; 88(2):341-7. PubMed ID: 12731718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Postidentification feedback affects subsequent eyewitness identification performance.
Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Dec; 16(4):387-98. PubMed ID: 21198255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of postidentification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification confidence.
Semmler C; Brewer N; Wells GL
J Appl Psychol; 2004 Apr; 89(2):334-46. PubMed ID: 15065979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Why are lineups better than showups? A test of the filler siphoning and enhanced discriminability accounts.
Colloff MF; Wixted JT
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Mar; 26(1):124-143. PubMed ID: 30883151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of cross-examination style questions on adult eyewitness accuracy depends on question type and eyewitness confidence.
Wade KA; Spearing ER
Memory; 2023 Feb; 31(2):163-178. PubMed ID: 36184815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
