These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

594 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29505569)

  • 1. Ways to increase precision and accuracy of wound area measurement using smart devices: Advanced app Planimator.
    Foltynski P
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0192485. PubMed ID: 29505569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wound Area Measurement with Digital Planimetry: Improved Accuracy and Precision with Calibration Based on 2 Rulers.
    Foltynski P; Ladyzynski P; Ciechanowska A; Migalska-Musial K; Judzewicz G; Sabalinska S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134622. PubMed ID: 26252747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new smartphone-based method for wound area measurement.
    Foltynski P; Ladyzynski P; Wojcicki JM
    Artif Organs; 2014 Apr; 38(4):346-52. PubMed ID: 24102380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital Planimetry With a New Adaptive Calibration Procedure Results in Accurate and Precise Wound Area Measurement at Curved Surfaces.
    Foltynski P; Ladyzynski P
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2022 Jan; 16(1):128-136. PubMed ID: 33000645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and precision of selected wound area measurement methods in diabetic foot ulceration.
    Foltynski P; Ladyzynski P; Sabalinska S; Wojcicki JM
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2013 Aug; 15(8):712-21. PubMed ID: 23902402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A study of the efficiency and convenience of an advanced portable Wound Measurement System (VISITRAK).
    Sugama J; Matsui Y; Sanada H; Konya C; Okuwa M; Kitagawa A
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Jul; 16(7):1265-9. PubMed ID: 17584344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Error rate of automated calculation for wound surface area using a digital photography.
    Yang S; Park J; Lee H; Lee JB; Lee BU; Oh BH
    Skin Res Technol; 2018 Feb; 24(1):117-122. PubMed ID: 28718523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simulated Wound Assessment Using Digital Planimetry versus Three-Dimensional Cameras: Implications for Clinical Assessment.
    Williams KJ; Sounderajah V; Dharmarajah B; Thapar A; Davies AH
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2017 May; 41():235-240. PubMed ID: 28163180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wound areas by computerized planimetry of digital images: accuracy and reliability.
    Mayrovitz HN; Soontupe LB
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 May; 22(5):222-9. PubMed ID: 19521289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ImageJ: A Free, Easy, and Reliable Method to Measure Leg Ulcers Using Digital Pictures.
    Aragón-Sánchez J; Quintana-Marrero Y; Aragón-Hernández C; Hernández-Herero MJ
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2017 Dec; 16(4):269-273. PubMed ID: 29251541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Evolving Field of Wound Measurement Techniques: A Literature Review.
    Khoo R; Jansen S
    Wounds; 2016 Jun; 28(6):175-81. PubMed ID: 27377609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wound debridement: Comparative reliability of three methods for measuring fibrin percentage in chronic wounds.
    Laplaud AL; Blaizot X; Gaillard C; Morice A; Lebreuilly I; Clément C; Parienti JJ; Dompmartin A
    Wound Repair Regen; 2010; 18(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 20082676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving Medical Photography in a Level 1 Trauma Center by Implementing a Specialized Smartphone-Based App in Comparison to the Usage of Digital Cameras: Prospective Panel Study.
    El Barbari JS; Fikuart M; Beisemann N; Müller M; Syrek H; Grützner PA; Franke J; Vetter SY
    JMIR Form Res; 2024 Jan; 8():e47572. PubMed ID: 38271087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of a new laser beam wound camera and a digital photoplanimetry-based method for wound measurement in horses.
    Van Hecke LL; De Mil TA; Haspeslagh M; Chiers K; Martens AM
    Vet J; 2015 Mar; 203(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 25665920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Point-of-care wound visioning technology: Reproducibility and accuracy of a wound measurement app.
    Wang SC; Anderson JAE; Evans R; Woo K; Beland B; Sasseville D; Moreau L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0183139. PubMed ID: 28817649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 3D photography is as accurate as digital planimetry tracing in determining burn wound area.
    Stockton KA; McMillan CM; Storey KJ; David MC; Kimble RM
    Burns; 2015 Feb; 41(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 24877886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of wound area measurement techniques: visitrak versus photography.
    Chang AC; Dearman B; Greenwood JE
    Eplasty; 2011 Apr; 11():e18. PubMed ID: 21559060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wound measurement comparing the use of acetate tracings and Visitrak digital planimetry.
    Gethin G; Cowman S
    J Clin Nurs; 2006 Apr; 15(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 16553755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Histogram Planimetry Method for the Measurement of Irregular Wounds.
    Yesiloglu N; Yildiz K; Cem Akpinar A; Gorgulu T; Sirinoglu H; Ozcan A
    Wounds; 2016 Sep; 28(9):328-333. PubMed ID: 27701128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital planimetry results in more accurate wound measurements: a comparison to standard ruler measurements.
    Rogers LC; Bevilacqua NJ; Armstrong DG; Andros G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2010 Jul; 4(4):799-802. PubMed ID: 20663440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.