These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29505859)

  • 1. Systematic reviews do not adequately report or address missing outcome data in their analyses: a methodological survey.
    Kahale LA; Diab B; Brignardello-Petersen R; Agarwal A; Mustafa RA; Kwong J; Neumann I; Li L; Lopes LC; Briel M; Busse JW; Iorio A; Vandvik PO; Alexander PE; Guyatt G; Akl EA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 99():14-23. PubMed ID: 29505859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey.
    Akl EA; Carrasco-Labra A; Brignardello-Petersen R; Neumann I; Johnston BC; Sun X; Briel M; Busse JW; Ebrahim S; Granados CE; Iorio A; Irfan A; Martínez García L; Mustafa RA; Ramírez-Morera A; Selva A; Solà I; Sanabria AJ; Tikkinen KA; Vandvik PO; Vernooij RW; Zazueta OE; Zhou Q; Guyatt GH; Alonso-Coello P
    BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e009368. PubMed ID: 26423858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A systematic survey shows that reporting and handling of missing outcome data in networks of interventions is poor.
    Spineli LM; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Schünemann HJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):115. PubMed ID: 30355280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reporting and handling missing outcome data in mental health: a systematic review of Cochrane systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Spineli LM; Pandis N; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Jun; 6(2):175-87. PubMed ID: 26099485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of missing participant data for dichotomous outcomes on pooled effect estimates in systematic reviews: a protocol for a methodological study.
    Akl EA; Kahale LA; Agarwal A; Al-Matari N; Ebrahim S; Alexander PE; Briel M; Brignardello-Petersen R; Busse JW; Diab B; Iorio A; Kwong J; Li L; Lopes LC; Mustafa R; Neumann I; Tikkinen KA; Vandvik PO; Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt G
    Syst Rev; 2014 Nov; 3():137. PubMed ID: 25423894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Potentially missing data are considerably more frequent than definitely missing data: a methodological survey of 638 randomized controlled trials.
    Kahale LA; Diab B; Khamis AM; Chang Y; Lopes LC; Agarwal A; Li L; Mustafa RA; Koujanian S; Waziry R; Busse JW; Dakik A; Guyatt G; Akl EA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 106():18-31. PubMed ID: 30300676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Handling trial participants with missing outcome data when conducting a meta-analysis: a systematic survey of proposed approaches.
    Akl EA; Kahale LA; Agoritsas T; Brignardello-Petersen R; Busse JW; Carrasco-Labra A; Ebrahim S; Johnston BC; Neumann I; Sola I; Sun X; Vandvik P; Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt G
    Syst Rev; 2015 Jul; 4():98. PubMed ID: 26202162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Potential impact of missing outcome data on treatment effects in systematic reviews: imputation study.
    Kahale LA; Khamis AM; Diab B; Chang Y; Lopes LC; Agarwal A; Li L; Mustafa RA; Koujanian S; Waziry R; Busse JW; Dakik A; Schünemann HJ; Hooft L; Scholten RJ; Guyatt GH; Akl EA
    BMJ; 2020 Aug; 370():m2898. PubMed ID: 32847800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-Analyses Proved Inconsistent in How Missing Data Were Handled Across Their Included Primary Trials: A Methodological Survey.
    Kahale LA; Khamis AM; Diab B; Chang Y; Lopes LC; Agarwal A; Li L; Mustafa RA; Koujanian S; Waziry R; Busse JW; Dakik A; Hooft L; Guyatt GH; Scholten RJPM; Akl EA
    Clin Epidemiol; 2020; 12():527-535. PubMed ID: 32547244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A guidance was developed to identify participants with missing outcome data in randomized controlled trials.
    Kahale LA; Guyatt GH; Agoritsas T; Briel M; Busse JW; Carrasco-Labra A; Khamis AM; Zhang Y; Hooft L; Scholten RJPM; Akl EA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Nov; 115():55-63. PubMed ID: 31299357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of heterogeneity and effect size on the estimation of the optimal information size: analysis of recently published meta-analyses.
    Garcia-Alamino JM; Bankhead C; Heneghan C; Pidduck N; Perera R
    BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e015888. PubMed ID: 29122784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Missing binary data extraction challenges from Cochrane reviews in mental health and Campbell reviews with implications for empirical research.
    Spineli LM
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):514-525. PubMed ID: 28961395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].
    Amato L; Colais P; Davoli M; Ferroni E; Fusco D; Minozzi S; Moirano F; Sciattella P; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Perucci CA
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. PubMed ID: 23851286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reporting missing participant data in randomised trials: systematic survey of the methodological literature and a proposed guide.
    Akl EA; Shawwa K; Kahale LA; Agoritsas T; Brignardello-Petersen R; Busse JW; Carrasco-Labra A; Ebrahim S; Johnston BC; Neumann I; Sola I; Sun X; Vandvik P; Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt GH
    BMJ Open; 2015 Dec; 5(12):e008431. PubMed ID: 26719310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews.
    Kirkham JJ; Dwan KM; Altman DG; Gamble C; Dodd S; Smyth R; Williamson PR
    BMJ; 2010 Feb; 340():c365. PubMed ID: 20156912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Not Available].
    Langer G; Gartlehner G; Schwingshackl L; Töws I; Meerpohl JJ
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2019 Dec; 149():73-81. PubMed ID: 32122800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reporting and Handling of Missing Participant Data in Systematic Reviews of Kidney Transplant Studies.
    Budhiraja P; Kalot MA; Alayli AE; Dimassi A; Kaplan B; Chakkera HA; Mustafa RA
    Transplantation; 2021 Aug; 105(8):1708-1717. PubMed ID: 33093406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Overviews of reviews incompletely report methods for handling overlapping, discordant, and problematic data.
    Lunny C; Brennan SE; Reid J; McDonald S; McKenzie JE
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 118():69-85. PubMed ID: 31606430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.