75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29505861)
1. Mohs Micrographic Surgery in the Surgical Treatment Paradigm of Melanoma In Situ and Invasive Melanoma: A Clinical Review of Treatment Efficacy and Ongoing Controversies.
Shah P; Trepanowski N; Grant-Kels JM; LeBoeuf M
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38768857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraoperative Immunohistochemistry During Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Staged Excision Decreases Local Recurrence Rates for Invasive Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
O'Hern K; Crum OM; Demer AM; Brewer JD
Dermatol Surg; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38530980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Epithelioma Cuniculatum (Plantar Verrucous Carcinoma): A Systematic Review of Treatment Options.
Shwe Daniel S; Cox SV; Kraus CN; Elsensohn AN
Cutis; 2023 Feb; 111(2):E19-E24. PubMed ID: 37075193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mohs micrographic surgery for the treatment of invasive melanoma: A systematic review with meta-analyses.
Williams GJ; Quinn T; Lo S; Guitera P; Scolyer RA; Thompson JF; Ch'ng S
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38842170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Time to Mohs Reconstruction: A Systematic Review Comparing Complication Rates between Immediate and Delayed Repair.
Sciegienka S; Slijepcevic A; Lipsey K; Spataro E; Chen C
Facial Plast Surg; 2024 Jun; 40(3):370-377. PubMed ID: 37336502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraneural Melanoma Identified With MART-1 Immunostaining in Mohs Micrographic Surgery.
Freeman SC; Dacy NN; Neill BC; Chisholm C; Tolkachjov SN
Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e58920. PubMed ID: 38800274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient-reported outcome measurements in facial skin surgery and a comparison between Mohs micrographic surgery and conventional excisions.
Marsidi N; Ottevanger R; Demir YE; van Beugen S; Goeman JJ; Genders RE
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38644735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of hospital attributes on patient choice for first visit: evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Shanghai, China.
Liu Y; Kong Q; Wang S; Zhong L; van de Klundert J
Health Policy Plan; 2020 Apr; 35(3):267-278. PubMed ID: 31830248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What Drives Patient Choice: Preferences for Approaches to Surgical Treatments for Breast Cancer Beyond Traditional Clinical Benchmarks.
Storm-Dickerson T; Das L; Gabriel A; Gitlin M; Farias J; Macarios D
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2018 Apr; 6(4):e1746. PubMed ID: 29876182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors Affecting Patient and Caregiver Preferences for Treatment of Myeloma and Indolent Lymphoma.
Tan CJ; Tan MSY; Nagarajan C; Chng WJ; Chee YL; Ooi M; Ng LCK; Chen Y; Yoong JSY; Wong XY; Jen WY
JCO Oncol Pract; 2023 Dec; 19(12):1168-1178. PubMed ID: 37844267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computerized Conjoint Analysis of the Weight Treatment Preferences of Individuals With Schizophrenia.
Goodsmith N; Cohen AN; Flynn AWP; Hamilton AB; Hellemann G; Nowlin-Finch N; Young AS
Psychiatr Serv; 2021 Mar; 72(3):288-294. PubMed ID: 33430650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical Decision-Making for Thrombolysis of Acute Minor Stroke Using Adaptive Conjoint Analysis.
Liberman AL; Pinto D; Rostanski SK; Labovitz DL; Naidech AM; Prabhakaran S
Neurohospitalist; 2019 Jan; 9(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 30671158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis: a new patient-centered approach to the assessment of health service preferences.
Cunningham CE; Deal K; Chen Y
Patient; 2010 Dec; 3(4):257-73. PubMed ID: 22273433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The rule of 10s versus the rule of 2s: High complication rates after conventional excision with postoperative margin assessment of specialty site versus trunk and proximal extremity melanomas.
Rzepecki AK; Hwang CD; Etzkorn JR; Shin TM; Sobanko JF; Howe NM; Miller CJ
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2021 Aug; 85(2):442-452. PubMed ID: 30447316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Willingness-to-pay for cancer treatment and outcome: a systematic review.
Yong ASJ; Lim YH; Cheong MWL; Hamzah E; Teoh SL
Eur J Health Econ; 2022 Aug; 23(6):1037-1057. PubMed ID: 34853930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patients prioritize local recurrence risk over other attributes for surgical treatment of facial melanomas-Results of a stated preference survey and choice-based conjoint analysis.
Etzkorn JR; Tuttle SD; Lim I; Feit EM; Sobanko JF; Shin TM; Neal DE; Miller CJ
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2018 Aug; 79(2):210-219.e3. PubMed ID: 29505861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for melanoma in situ (MIS) of the trunk and proximal extremities.
Stigall LE; Brodland DG; Zitelli JA
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2016 Nov; 75(5):1015-1021. PubMed ID: 27473456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low recurrence rates for in situ and invasive melanomas using Mohs micrographic surgery with melanoma antigen recognized by T cells 1 (MART-1) immunostaining: tissue processing methodology to optimize pathologic staging and margin assessment.
Etzkorn JR; Sobanko JF; Elenitsas R; Newman JG; Goldbach H; Shin TM; Miller CJ
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2015 May; 72(5):840-50. PubMed ID: 25774012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
