These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2950601)

  • 1. Comparative validity of the sickness impact profile and shorter scales for functional assessment in low-back pain.
    Deyo RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1986 Nov; 11(9):951-4. PubMed ID: 2950601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring physical and psychosocial function in patients with low-back pain.
    Deyo RA; Diehl AK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1983 Sep; 8(6):635-42. PubMed ID: 6228020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity of the Sickness Impact Profile Roland scale as a measure of dysfunction in chronic pain patients.
    Jensen MP; Strom SE; Turner JA; Romano JM
    Pain; 1992 Aug; 50(2):157-162. PubMed ID: 1408311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity of Sickness Impact Profile items to measure change over time in a low-back pain patient group.
    Stratford P; Solomon P; Binkley J; Finch E; Gill C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Oct; 18(13):1723-7. PubMed ID: 8235854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The sickness impact profile: a global measure of disability in chronic low back pain.
    Follick MJ; Smith TW; Ahern DK
    Pain; 1985 Jan; 21(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 3157091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness.
    Davidson M; Keating JL
    Phys Ther; 2002 Jan; 82(1):8-24. PubMed ID: 11784274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development, validity, and reliability of The Assessment of Pain and Occupational Performance (POP): a new instrument using two dimensions in the investigation of disability in back pain.
    Perneros G; Tropp H
    Spine J; 2009 Jun; 9(6):486-98. PubMed ID: 19398217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NHP or SIP--a comparative study in renal insufficiency associated anemia.
    Essink-Bot ML; Krabbe PF; van Agt HM; Bonsel GJ
    Qual Life Res; 1996 Feb; 5(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 8901371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A New Version of the Impairment and Functioning Inventory for Patients With Chronic Pain (IFI-R).
    Ramírez-Maestre C; Esteve R
    PM R; 2015 May; 7(5):455-65. PubMed ID: 25529613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance.
    Deyo RA; Centor RM
    J Chronic Dis; 1986; 39(11):897-906. PubMed ID: 2947907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Chronic Illness Problem Inventory as a measure of dysfunction in chronic pain patients.
    Romano JM; Turner JA; Jensen MP
    Pain; 1992 Apr; 49(1):71-75. PubMed ID: 1534401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Italian version of the Sickness Impact Profile-Roland Scale for chronic pain: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and sensitivity to change.
    Monticone M; Baiardi P; Nava T; Rocca B; Foti C
    Disabil Rehabil; 2011; 33(15-16):1299-305. PubMed ID: 21034202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are localized low back pain and generalized back pain similar entities? Results of a longitudinal community based study.
    Jacob T; Zeev A
    Disabil Rehabil; 2006 Mar; 28(6):369-77. PubMed ID: 16492633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index demonstrates factor, construct and longitudinal validity.
    MacDermid JC; Solomon P; Prkachin K
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2006 Feb; 7():12. PubMed ID: 16472394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring participation in patients with chronic back pain-the 5-Item Pain Disability Index.
    McKillop AB; Carroll LJ; Dick BD; Battié MC
    Spine J; 2018 Feb; 18(2):307-313. PubMed ID: 28735767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go?
    Mannion AF; Elfering A; Staerkle R; Junge A; Grob D; Semmer NK; Jacobshagen N; Dvorak J; Boos N
    Eur Spine J; 2005 Dec; 14(10):1014-26. PubMed ID: 15937673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Difference in evaluation of patients with low back pain using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score for Back Pain and the Japanese Version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.
    Nakamura M; Miyamoto K; Shimizu K
    J Orthop Sci; 2009 Jul; 14(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 19662468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computerized adaptive testing in back pain: validation of the CAT-5D-QOL.
    Kopec JA; Badii M; McKenna M; Lima VD; Sayre EC; Dvorak M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(12):1384-90. PubMed ID: 18496353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability and validity of the back performance scale: observing activity limitation in patients with back pain.
    Magnussen L; Strand LI; Lygren H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(8):903-7. PubMed ID: 15082994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain.
    Kamper SJ; Apeldoorn AT; Chiarotto A; Smeets RJ; Ostelo RW; Guzman J; van Tulder MW
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Sep; 2014(9):CD000963. PubMed ID: 25180773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.