420 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29506569)
1. Does the primary route of spread have a prognostic significance in stage III non-serous epithelial ovarian cancer?
Sahin H; Meydanli MM; Sari ME; Yalcin I; Çoban G; Ozkan NT; Cuylan ZF; Erdem B; Gungorduk K; Akbayir Ö; Dede M; Salman MC; Güngör T; Ayhan A
J Ovarian Res; 2018 Mar; 11(1):21. PubMed ID: 29506569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What is the role of retroperitoneal exploration in optimally debulked stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer? An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group ancillary data study.
Rungruang BJ; Miller A; Krivak TC; Horowitz NS; Rodriguez N; Hamilton CA; Backes FJ; Carson LF; Friedlander M; Mutch DG; Goodheart MJ; Tewari KS; Wenham RM; Bookman MA; Maxwell GL; Richard SD
Cancer; 2017 May; 123(6):985-993. PubMed ID: 27864921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Should stage IIIC ovarian cancer be further stratified by intraperitoneal vs. retroperitoneal only disease?: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
Rungruang B; Miller A; Richard SD; Hamilton CA; Rodriguez N; Bookman MA; Maxwell GL; Krivak TC; Horowitz NS
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jan; 124(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 22032836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of pelvic retroperitoneal invasion and distant nodal metastases in epithelial ovarian cancer.
Pereira A; Pérez-Medina T; Magrina JF; Magtibay PM; Rodríguez-Tapia A; Pérez-Milán F; Ortiz-Quintana L
Surg Oncol; 2014 Mar; 23(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 24183480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of survival outcomes in optimally and maximally cytoreduced stage IIIC ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: Women with only peritoneal tumor burden versus women with both peritoneal and lymphogenous dissemination.
Selcuk I; Meydanli MM; Yalcin I; Gungorduk K; Akgol S; Çelik H; Ayhan A
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Oct; 45(10):2074-2081. PubMed ID: 31373110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in apparent early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: implications for surgical staging.
Powless CA; Aletti GD; Bakkum-Gamez JN; Cliby WA
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Sep; 122(3):536-40. PubMed ID: 21636114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lymph Node Involvement Pattern and Survival Differences of FIGO IIIC and FIGO IIIA1 Ovarian Cancer Patients After Primary Complete Tumor Debulking Surgery: A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis of the Tumor Bank Ovarian Cancer Network.
Gasimli K; Braicu EI; Nassir M; Richter R; Babayeva A; Chekerov R; Darb-Esfahani S; Sehouli J; Muallem MZ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 23(4):1279-86. PubMed ID: 26832880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of lymph node ratio on survival in stage III ovarian high-grade serous cancer: a Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
Ayhan A; Ozkan NT; Sarı ME; Celik H; Dede M; Akbayır Ö; Güngördük K; Şahin H; Haberal A; Güngör T; Arvas M; Meydanlı MM
J Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):e12. PubMed ID: 29185270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic factors for maximally or optimally cytoreduced stage III nonserous epithelial ovarian carcinoma treated with carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy.
Cuylan ZF; Meydanli MM; Sari ME; Akbayir O; Celik H; Dede M; Sahin H; Gungorduk K; Kuscu E; Ozgul N; Gungor T; Ayhan A
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1284-1293. PubMed ID: 29727055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Oncologic outcome after recurrence in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: are clear-cell and mucinous histological types a different entities?
Kajiyama H; Mizuno M; Shibata K; Umezu T; Suzuki S; Yamamoto E; Mitsui H; Sekiya R; Niimi K; Kawai M; Nagasaka T; Kikkawa F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Oct; 181():305-10. PubMed ID: 25203309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of stage III mucinous and serous ovarian cancer: a case-control study.
Firat Cuylan Z; Karabuk E; Oz M; Turan AT; Meydanli MM; Taskin S; Sari ME; Sahin H; Ulukent SC; Akbayir O; Gungorduk K; Gungor T; Kose MF; Ayhan A
J Ovarian Res; 2018 Oct; 11(1):91. PubMed ID: 30376858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stage- and Histologic Subtype-Dependent Frequency of Lymph Node Metastases in Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Undergoing Systematic Pelvic and Paraaortic Lymphadenectomy.
Heitz F; Harter P; Ataseven B; Heikaus S; Schneider S; Prader S; Bommert M; Fisseler-Eckhoff A; Traut A; du Bois A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):2053-2059. PubMed ID: 29633097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the risk of pelvic and para-aortic nodal involvement in apparent early-stage ovarian cancer: A predictors- and nomogram-based analyses.
Bogani G; Tagliabue E; Ditto A; Signorelli M; Martinelli F; Casarin J; Chiappa V; Dondi G; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Scaffa C; Borghi C; Montanelli L; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Oct; 147(1):61-65. PubMed ID: 28779965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lymph node metastases as only qualifier for stage IV serous ovarian cancer confers longer survival than other sites of distant disease - a Swedish Gynecologic Cancer Group (SweGCG) study.
Hjerpe E; Staf C; Dahm-Kähler P; Stålberg K; Bjurberg M; Holmberg E; Borgfeldt C; Tholander B; Hellman K; Kjølhede P; Högberg T; Rosenberg P; Åvall-Lundqvist E
Acta Oncol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):331-337. PubMed ID: 29130381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. FOXM1 expression is significantly associated with chemotherapy resistance and adverse prognosis in non-serous epithelial ovarian cancer patients.
Tassi RA; Todeschini P; Siegel ER; Calza S; Cappella P; Ardighieri L; Cadei M; Bugatti M; Romani C; Bandiera E; Zanotti L; Tassone L; Guarino D; Santonocito C; Capoluongo ED; Beltrame L; Erba E; Marchini S; D'Incalci M; Donzelli C; Santin AD; Pecorelli S; Sartori E; Bignotti E; Odicino F; Ravaggi A
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2017 May; 36(1):63. PubMed ID: 28482906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patterns of Lymph Node Metastases in Apparent Stage I Low-Grade Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Multicenter Study.
Minig L; Heitz F; Cibula D; Bakkum-Gamez JN; Germanova A; Dowdy SC; Kalogera E; Zapardiel I; Lindemann K; Harter P; Scambia G; Petrillo M; Zorrero C; Zanagnolo V; Rebollo JMC; du Bois A; Fotopoulou C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 24(9):2720-2726. PubMed ID: 28608122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer is feasible with high completion rates, low complications, and acceptable patient outcomes.
Skaznik-Wikiel ME; Lesnock JL; McBee WC; Beriwal S; Zorn KK; Richard SD; Krivak TC; Edwards RP
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Feb; 22(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 22080886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of early-stage primary serous fallopian tube carcinomas and equivalent stage serous epithelial ovarian carcinomas.
Horng HC; Lai CR; Chang WH; Wen KC; Chen YJ; Juang CM; Yen MS; Wang PH
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 53(4):547-51. PubMed ID: 25510699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of primary intraperitoneal chemotherapy to consolidation intraperitoneal chemotherapy in optimally resected advanced ovarian cancer.
Suidan RS; St Clair CM; Lee SJ; Barlin JN; Long Roche KC; Tanner EJ; Sonoda Y; Barakat RR; Zivanovic O; Chi DS
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Sep; 134(3):468-72. PubMed ID: 25042672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Should epithelial ovarian carcinoma metastatic to the inguinal lymph nodes be assigned stage IVB?
Nasioudis D; Chapman-Davis E; Frey MK; Caputo TA; Witkin SS; Holcomb K
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Oct; 147(1):81-84. PubMed ID: 28716307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
