These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29506665)
41. Update on the Manuscript Peer Review Process. Elmore SA Toxicol Pathol; 2017 Dec; 45(8):1028-1031. PubMed ID: 29145784 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Peer review: (r)evolution needed. Sipido KR; Gal D; Luttun A; Janssens S; Sampaolesi M; Holvoet P Cardiovasc Res; 2017 Nov; 113(13):e54-e56. PubMed ID: 29088379 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Editorial: an age of enlightenment or information overload? Davis TR J Hand Surg Br; 2004 Dec; 29(6):521-9. PubMed ID: 15542210 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors. Newton DP Account Res; 2010 May; 17(3):130-45. PubMed ID: 20461569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The Importance of Facts and the Role of Academic Publishers in Today's World-A Publisher's View. Schiff D Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2017 Apr; 27(2):v. PubMed ID: 28291992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Innovation, journal reviewers, and journal editors the game is worth the candle. Popp RL J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Oct; 46(7):1360-1. PubMed ID: 16198856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The contemporary landscape of journal publishing. McKenna L Collegian; 2016; 23(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 27188033 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Manual Therapy adopts mandatory reporting guidelines for publishing. Cook C; Jull G; Moore A Man Ther; 2014 Oct; 19(5):365-6. PubMed ID: 25090975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Quality in qualitative research. Kitto SC; Chesters J; Grbich C Med J Aust; 2008 Feb; 188(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 18279135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Translation of the scientific method... Peer review. Scarfe WC Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Apr; 109(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 20176497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Open access under scrutiny. Samkange-Zeeb F; Zeeb H J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):885-6. PubMed ID: 24285443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology: premium space! Gilchrest BA J Invest Dermatol; 2012 Dec; 132(12):2671. PubMed ID: 23187104 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Peer Review in Transplantation. Hutchinson JA Transplantation; 2015 Sep; 99(9):1746-8. PubMed ID: 26308410 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Ideas regarding developing, submitting, reviewing, and publishing a scientific manuscript: an editor's perspective. Apuzzo ML World Neurosurg; 2014; 81(3-4):443-6. PubMed ID: 24720909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Peer review of human studies run amok: a break in the fiduciary relation between scientists and the public. Feldstein Ewing SW; Saitz R Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 20(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 25121564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Peer Review - Essential for Article and Journal Scientific Assessment and Validity. Masic I Med Arch; 2016 Jun; 70(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 27594739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal. Liesegang TJ Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]