145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29508535)
21. Optimal photon energy comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography: a case study.
Di Maria S; Baptista M; Felix M; Oliveira N; Matela N; Janeiro L; Vaz P; Orvalho L; Silva A
Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 24613514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Experimental phantom lesion detectability study using a digital breast tomosynthesis prototype system.
Schulz-Wendtland R; Wenkel E; Lell M; Böhner C; Bautz WA; Mertelmeier T
Rofo; 2006 Dec; 178(12):1219-23. PubMed ID: 17136645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Digital breast tomosynthesis: studies of the effects of acquisition geometry on contrast-to-noise ratio and observer preference of low-contrast objects in breast phantom images.
Goodsitt MM; Chan HP; Schmitz A; Zelakiewicz S; Telang S; Hadjiiski L; Watcharotone K; Helvie MA; Paramagul C; Neal C; Christodoulou E; Larson SC; Carson PL
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 59(19):5883-902. PubMed ID: 25211509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Development and preclinical evaluation of a patient-specific high energy x-ray phase sensitive breast tomosynthesis system.
Ghani MU; Wu X; Fajardo LL; Jing Z; Wong MD; Zheng B; Omoumi F; Li Y; Yan A; Jenkins P; Hillis SL; Linstroth L; Liu H
Med Phys; 2021 May; 48(5):2511-2520. PubMed ID: 33523479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A novel DTI-QA tool: Automated metric extraction exploiting the sphericity of an agar filled phantom.
Chavez S; Viviano J; Zamyadi M; Kingsley PB; Kochunov P; Strother S; Voineskos A
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 46():28-39. PubMed ID: 29054737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of a novel collimator for molecular breast tomosynthesis.
Gilland DR; Welch BL; Lee S; Kross B; Weisenberger AG
Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5740-5748. PubMed ID: 28877351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A novel pre-processing technique for improving image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Kim H; Lee T; Hong J; Sabir S; Lee JR; Choi YW; Kim HH; Chae EY; Cho S
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):417-425. PubMed ID: 28032909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison study of reconstruction algorithms for prototype digital breast tomosynthesis using various breast phantoms.
Kim YS; Park HS; Lee HH; Choi YW; Choi JG; Kim HH; Kim HJ
Radiol Med; 2016 Feb; 121(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 26383027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A Case for Wide-Angle Breast Tomosynthesis.
Samei E; Thompson J; Richard S; Bowsher J
Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):860-9. PubMed ID: 25920335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Variation in digital breast tomosynthesis image quality at differing heights above the detector.
Davidson R; Al Khalifah K; Zhou A
J Med Radiat Sci; 2022 Jun; 69(2):174-181. PubMed ID: 34957671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Systematic approach to a channelized Hotelling model observer implementation for a physical phantom containing mass-like lesions: Application to digital breast tomosynthesis.
Petrov D; Marshall NW; Young KC; Bosmans H
Phys Med; 2019 Feb; 58():8-20. PubMed ID: 30824154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quantitation of clinical feedback on image quality differences between two CT scanner models.
Bache ST; Stauduhar PJ; Liu X; Loyer EM; John RX
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):163-169. PubMed ID: 28300384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Central online quality assurance in radiology: an IT solution exemplified by the German Breast Cancer Screening Program].
Czwoydzinski J; Girnus R; Sommer A; Heindel W; Lenzen H
Rofo; 2011 Sep; 183(9):849-54. PubMed ID: 21830180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Experimental evaluation of seven quality control phantoms for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Sage J; Fezzani KL; Fitton I; Hadid L; Moussier A; Pierrat N; Martineau A; Dreuil S; Heulers L; Etard C
Phys Med; 2019 Jan; 57():137-144. PubMed ID: 30738517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Parallel-scanning tomosynthesis using a slot scanning technique: fixed-focus reconstruction and the resulting image quality.
Shibata K; Notohara D; Sakai T
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111903. PubMed ID: 25370636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Receive coil quality assurance procedure and automated analysis for ViewRay MRIdian MR-Linac.
Kaza E; Williams CL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 25(3):e14275. PubMed ID: 38230873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessing task performance in FFDM, DBT, and synthetic mammography using uniform and anthropomorphic physical phantoms.
Ikejimba LC; Glick SJ; Choudhury KR; Samei E; Lo JY
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5593. PubMed ID: 27782687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A novel physical anthropomorphic breast phantom for 2D and 3D x-ray imaging.
Ikejimba LC; Graff CG; Rosenthal S; Badal A; Ghammraoui B; Lo JY; Glick SJ
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):407-416. PubMed ID: 27992059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An Enhanced Visualization of DBT Imaging Using Blind Deconvolution and Total Variation Minimization Regularization.
Mota AM; Clarkson MJ; Almeida P; Matela N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2020 Dec; 39(12):4094-4101. PubMed ID: 32746152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
