142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29508545)
1. Quality of life assessment of patients utilizing orbital implant-supported prostheses.
de Oliveira FM; Salazar-Gamarra R; Öhman D; Nannmark U; Pecorari V; Dib LL
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):438-443. PubMed ID: 29508545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality of life of patients with implant-retained maxillofacial prostheses: a prospective and retrospective study.
Nemli SK; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bal BT; Arici YK
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 23328196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the 'Quality of Life with Implant Prostheses (QoLIP-10)' questionnaire for wearers of cement-retained implant-supported restorations.
Perea C; Del Río J; Preciado A; Lynch CD; Celemín A; Castillo-Oyagüe R
J Dent; 2015 Aug; 43(8):1021-31. PubMed ID: 25862276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment satisfaction with facial prostheses.
Chang TL; Garrett N; Roumanas E; Beumer J
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 16126080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new, short, specific questionnaire (QoLIP-10) for evaluating the oral health-related quality of life of implant-retained overdenture and hybrid prosthesis wearers.
Preciado A; Del Río J; Lynch CD; Castillo-Oyagüe R
J Dent; 2013 Sep; 41(9):753-63. PubMed ID: 23831418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survival rate of disk and screw-type implants used for the retention of extraoral prostheses.
Vitomir KS; Filip I; Vojkan L; Igor Đ; Lukasz P
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):499-507. PubMed ID: 33323178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Level of satisfaction in patients with maxillary full-arch fixed prostheses: zygomatic versus conventional implants.
Peñarrocha M; Carrillo C; Boronat A; Martí E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):769-73. PubMed ID: 17974111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Survival rates and periimplant soft tissue evaluation of extraoral implants over a mean follow-up period of three years.
Karakoca S; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bal BT
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):458-64. PubMed ID: 19033030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Osseointegrated implant supported prostheses in the rehabilitation of severe orbital deformity in 6 cases].
Hou ZJ; Liu JM; Song TL; Chen ZY; Zhao SC; Li DM
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Sep; 55(9):665-669. PubMed ID: 31495151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation: A survey on the quality of life.
Dings JPJ; Merkx MAW; de Clonie Maclennan-Naphausen MTP; van de Pol P; Maal TJJ; Meijer GJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):780-786. PubMed ID: 30414646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retrospective study of implant-retained orbital prostheses: implant survival and patient satisfaction.
Karakoca Nemli S; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Sarisoy S; Kasko Y
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1178-83. PubMed ID: 20613601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality of life and satisfaction of patients wearing implant-supported fixed partial denture: a cross-sectional survey of patients from Araçatuba city, Brazil.
Goiato MC; Torcato LB; Dos Santos DM; Moreno A; Antenucci RM; de Carvalho Dekon SF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Jun; 26(6):701-8. PubMed ID: 24689971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Within-Subject Comparison of Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life Between a Two-Implant Overdenture and a Three-Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prosthesis in the Mandible.
Beresford D; Klineberg I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1374-1382. PubMed ID: 30427970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant-supported facial prostheses provided by a maxillofacial unit in a U.K. regional hospital: longevity and patient opinions.
Hooper SM; Westcott T; Evans PL; Bocca AP; Jagger DC
J Prosthodont; 2005 Mar; 14(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15733133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment outcome of bone-anchored craniofacial prostheses after tumor surgery.
Schoen PJ; Raghoebar GM; van Oort RP; Reintsema H; van der Laan BF; Burlage FR; Roodenburg JL; Vissink A
Cancer; 2001 Dec; 92(12):3045-50. PubMed ID: 11753982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impacts of implant treatment on daily living.
Al-Omiri MK; Hammad OA; Lynch E; Lamey PJ; Clifford TJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):877-86. PubMed ID: 21841999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retrospective study of treatment outcomes with implant-retained extraoral prostheses: survival rates and prosthetic complications.
Karakoca S; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bal BT
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):118-26. PubMed ID: 20141816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of Satisfaction Level of Edentulous Patients Rehabilitated with Implant-Supported Prostheses.
de Souza FI; de Souza Costa A; Dos Santos Pereira R; Dos Santos PH; de Brito RB; Rocha EP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):884-90. PubMed ID: 27447157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extraoral prostheses using extraoral implants.
Pekkan G; Tuna SH; Oghan F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 40(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 21255978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oral aesthetic-related quality of life of muco-supported prosthesis and implant-retained overdenture wearers assessed by a new, short, specific scale (QoLDAS-9).
Perea C; Preciado A; Río JD; Lynch CD; Celemín A; Castillo-Oyagüe R
J Dent; 2015 Nov; 43(11):1337-45. PubMed ID: 26318420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
