326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29509023)
1. Accuracy of three-dimensional dental resin models created by fused deposition modeling, stereolithography, and Polyjet prototype technologies: A comparative study.
Rebong RE; Stewart KT; Utreja A; Ghoneima AA
Angle Orthod; 2018 May; 88(3):363-369. PubMed ID: 29509023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dimensional accuracy and surface characteristics of 3D-printed dental casts.
Park JM; Jeon J; Koak JY; Kim SK; Heo SJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):427-437. PubMed ID: 32958301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Printed Casts, Digital, and Conventional Casts: An In Vitro Study.
Aly P; Mohsen C
Eur J Dent; 2020 Mar; 14(2):189-193. PubMed ID: 32311750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A validation study of reconstructed rapid prototyping models produced by two technologies.
Dietrich CA; Ender A; Baumgartner S; Mehl A
Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):782-787. PubMed ID: 28459285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of internal design on the accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed casts fabricated by stereolithography and digital light processing technology.
Chen Y; Li H; Zhai Z; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):381.e1-381.e7. PubMed ID: 37482533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy, reproducibility, and dimensional stability of additively manufactured surgical templates.
Chen L; Lin WS; Polido WD; Eckert GJ; Morton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Sep; 122(3):309-314. PubMed ID: 30948293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy evaluation of complete-arch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: a three-dimensional analysis.
Emir F; Ayyildiz S
J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Aug; 65(3):365-370. PubMed ID: 33177305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital and 3D-printed casts compared with conventional stone casts.
Ellakany P; Al-Harbi F; El Tantawi M; Mohsen C
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):438-444. PubMed ID: 33308856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of a simplified 3D-printed implant surgical guide.
Kim T; Lee S; Kim GB; Hong D; Kwon J; Park JW; Kim N
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):195-201.e2. PubMed ID: 31753464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Precision and trueness of dental models manufactured with different 3-dimensional printing techniques.
Kim SY; Shin YS; Jung HD; Hwang CJ; Baik HS; Cha JY
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jan; 153(1):144-153. PubMed ID: 29287640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the fused deposition modeling and the digital light processing techniques in terms of dimensional accuracy of printing dental models used for the fabrication of clear aligners.
Jaber ST; Hajeer MY; Khattab TZ; Mahaini L
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2021 Aug; 7(4):591-600. PubMed ID: 33258297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of current additive manufacturing systems for orthodontic 3-dimensional printing.
Akyalcin S; Rutkowski P; Arrigo M; Trotman CA; Kasper FK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Oct; 160(4):594-602. PubMed ID: 34579820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of stereolithographically printed digital models compared to plaster models.
Camardella LT; Vilella OV; van Hezel MM; Breuning KH
J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Sep; 78(5):394-402. PubMed ID: 28361165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clear guidance to select the most accurate technologies for 3D printing dental models - A network meta-analysis
Németh A; Vitai V; Czumbel ML; Szabó B; Varga G; Kerémi B; Hegyi P; Hermann P; Borbély J
J Dent; 2023 Jul; 134():104532. PubMed ID: 37120090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Technical note: The use of 3D printing in dental anthropology collections.
Fiorenza L; Yong R; Ranjitkar S; Hughes T; Quayle M; McMenamin PG; Kaidonis J; Townsend GC; Adams JW
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 Oct; 167(2):400-406. PubMed ID: 30129183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of 3-dimensional computer-aided manufactured single-tooth implant definitive casts.
Buda M; Bratos M; Sorensen JA
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 29961627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of commercial 3D printers for the fabrication of surgical guides in dental implantology.
Rouzé l'Alzit F; Cade R; Naveau A; Babilotte J; Meglioli M; Catros S
J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103909. PubMed ID: 34852291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of linear transverse measures between plaster and resin printed digital models.
Manuelli M; Huanca Ghislanzoni L; Farronato M; Martintoni A; Marcolina M; Lucchese A
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2018; 32(2 Suppl. 2):81-85. PubMed ID: 29720334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Possibility of reconstruction of dental plaster cast from 3D digital study models.
Kasparova M; Grafova L; Dvorak P; Dostalova T; Prochazka A; Eliasova H; Prusa J; Kakawand S
Biomed Eng Online; 2013 May; 12():49. PubMed ID: 23721330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of the three-dimensional printing technique and printing layer thickness on model accuracy.
Zhang ZC; Li PL; Chu FT; Shen G
J Orofac Orthop; 2019 Jul; 80(4):194-204. PubMed ID: 31172199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
