These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29509112)

  • 1. Effectiveness of a non-medicated wound dressing on attached and biofilm encased bacteria: laboratory and clinical evidence.
    Rippon MG; Rogers AA; Sellars L; Styles KM; Westgate S
    J Wound Care; 2018 Mar; 27(3):146-155. PubMed ID: 29509112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Treating drug-resistant wound pathogens with non-medicated dressings: an
    Rippon MG; Rogers AA; Westgate S
    J Wound Care; 2019 Sep; 28(9):629-638. PubMed ID: 31513496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing wound dressings using an in vitro wound model.
    Lipp C; Kirker K; Agostinho A; James G; Stewart P
    J Wound Care; 2010 Jun; 19(6):220-6. PubMed ID: 20551862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of a polyhexamethylene biguanide-containing wound cleansing solution using experimental biofilm models.
    Rippon M; Rogers AA; Westgate S; Ousey K
    J Wound Care; 2023 Jun; 32(6):359-367. PubMed ID: 37300862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro assessment of bacterial transfer by products used in debridement.
    Rippon MG; Rogers AA; Sellars L; Purcell LEJ; Westgate S
    J Wound Care; 2018 Oct; 27(10):679-685. PubMed ID: 30332357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The ability of a colloidal silver gel wound dressing to kill bacteria in vitro and in vivo.
    Tran PL; Huynh E; Hamood AN; de Souza A; Mehta D; Moeller KW; Moeller CD; Morgan M; Reid TW
    J Wound Care; 2017 Apr; 26(sup4):S16-S24. PubMed ID: 28379105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of human acute wound fluid on the antibacterial efficacy of different antiseptic polyurethane foam dressings: An in vitro analysis.
    Rembe JD; Fromm-Dornieden C; Böhm J; Stuermer EK
    Wound Repair Regen; 2018 Jan; 26(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 29363857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development, characterization, and evaluation of a simple polymicrobial colony biofilm model for testing of antimicrobial wound dressings.
    Robertson SN; Romero M; Fenn S; Kohler Riedi PL; Cámara M
    J Appl Microbiol; 2024 Mar; 135(3):. PubMed ID: 38366933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the effect of an antimicrobial wound dressing on biofilms.
    Percival SL; Bowler P; Woods EJ
    Wound Repair Regen; 2008; 16(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 18211579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cadexomer iodine provides superior efficacy against bacterial wound biofilms in vitro and in vivo.
    Fitzgerald DJ; Renick PJ; Forrest EC; Tetens SP; Earnest DN; McMillan J; Kiedaisch BM; Shi L; Roche ED
    Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Jan; 25(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 27859922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modelling antisepsis using defined populations of facultative and anaerobic wound pathogens grown in a basally perfused biofilm model.
    Oates A; Lindsay S; Mistry H; Ortega F; McBain AJ
    Biofouling; 2018 May; 34(5):507-518. PubMed ID: 29873244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Antimicrobial PLGA ultrafine fibers: interaction with wound bacteria.
    Said SS; Aloufy AK; El-Halfawy OM; Boraei NA; El-Khordagui LK
    Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2011 Sep; 79(1):108-18. PubMed ID: 21396444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Efficacy of Tetrasodium EDTA on Biofilms.
    Percival SL; Salisbury AM
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2018; 1057():101-110. PubMed ID: 29280095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ag5IO6: novel antibiofilm activity of a silver compound with application to medical devices.
    Incani V; Omar A; Prosperi-Porta G; Nadworny P
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2015 Jun; 45(6):586-93. PubMed ID: 25604278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A systematic comparison of antimicrobial wound dressings using a planktonic cell and an immobilized cell model.
    Shoukat K; Pilling S; Rout S; Bradbury J; Humphreys PN
    J Appl Microbiol; 2015 Dec; 119(6):1552-60. PubMed ID: 26451878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A study on the ability of quaternary ammonium groups attached to a polyurethane foam wound dressing to inhibit bacterial attachment and biofilm formation.
    Tran PL; Hamood AN; de Souza A; Schultz G; Liesenfeld B; Mehta D; Reid TW
    Wound Repair Regen; 2015; 23(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 25469865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical and in vitro performance of an antibiofilm Hydrofiber wound dressing.
    Scully R; Hurlow J; Walker M; Metcalf D; Parsons D; Bowler P
    J Wound Care; 2018 Sep; 27(9):584-592. PubMed ID: 30204577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of a novel, antimicrobial dressing on in vivo, Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound biofilm: quantitative comparative analysis using a rabbit ear model.
    Seth AK; Zhong A; Nguyen KT; Hong SJ; Leung KP; Galiano RD; Mustoe TA
    Wound Repair Regen; 2014; 22(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 25230854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Antimicrobial peptides prevent bacterial biofilm formation on the surface of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement.
    Volejníková A; Melicherčík P; Nešuta O; Vaňková E; Bednárová L; Rybáček J; Čeřovský V
    J Med Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 68(6):961-972. PubMed ID: 31107198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Antibacterial properties and reduction of MRSA biofilm with a dressing combining polyabsorbent fibres and a silver matrix.
    Desroche N; Dropet C; Janod P; Guzzo J
    J Wound Care; 2016 Oct; 25(10):577-584. PubMed ID: 27681588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.