These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29509347)

  • 1. Short-term treatment effects of the quad-helix appliance on dentofacial morphology of hyperdivergent patients.
    Endo S; Yamada W; Shundo I; Kobayashi Y; Komatsuzakit A; Endo T
    Aust Orthod J; 2016 Nov; 32(2):211-220. PubMed ID: 29509347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short-term treatment effects of quad-helix on maxillomandibular expansion in patients with maxillary incisor crowding.
    Shundo I; Kobayashi Y; Endo T
    Odontology; 2012 Jan; 100(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 21674183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
    Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment effects of quad-helix on the eruption pattern of maxillary second molars.
    Kobayashi Y; Shundo I; Endo T
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Jul; 82(4):676-81. PubMed ID: 22149543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A case report of bilateral Brodie bite in early mixed dentition using bonded constriction quad-helix appliance.
    Nojima K; Takaku S; Murase C; Nishii Y; Sueishi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2011; 52(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 21467780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
    VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of different treatment techniques for posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition.
    Erdinç AE; Ugur T; Erbay E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Sep; 116(3):287-300. PubMed ID: 10474101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noncompliance maxillary molar distalization with the first class appliance: a randomized controlled trial.
    Papadopoulos MA; Melkos AB; Athanasiou AE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):586.e1-586.e13; discussion 586-7. PubMed ID: 20451774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short-term skeletal and dental effects of the Xbow appliance as measured on lateral cephalograms.
    Flores-Mir C; Barnett G; Higgins DW; Heo G; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):822-32. PubMed ID: 19962605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
    Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
    Lau EY; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC; Hughes T
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in hyperdivergent patients.
    Lineberger MW; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Herberger T; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 22748991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonextraction treatment of a high-angle class II malocclusion: a case report.
    Giancotti A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):721-7. PubMed ID: 10842116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.
    Pancherz H
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1982; 15():189-96. PubMed ID: 6963773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Treatment of Class II malocclusion using the Herbst appliance].
    Schiavoni R
    Mondo Ortod; 1990; 15(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 2402252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Angelieri F; Almeida RR; Almeida MR; Fuziy A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):520-7. PubMed ID: 16627178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
    Ngan P; Wilmes B; Drescher D; Martin C; Weaver B; Gunel E
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
    Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. One year treatment effects of the eruption guidance appliance in 7- to 8-year-old children: a randomized clinical trial.
    Myrlund R; Dubland M; Keski-Nisula K; Kerosuo H
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 25005108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.