These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29509347)

  • 21. Skeletal and dento-alveolar changes obtained with customised and preformed eruption guidance appliances after 1-year treatment in early mixed dentition.
    Lanteri V; Cagetti MG; Ugolini A; Gaffuri F; Maspero C; Abate A
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2023 Sep; 24(3):180 - 187. PubMed ID: 37337957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Orthodontic treatment of openbite and deepbite high-angle malocclusions.
    Hering K; Ruf S; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):470-7. PubMed ID: 10515146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The mechanism of Class II correction during Herbst therapy in relation to the vertical jaw base relationship: a cephalometric roentgenographic study.
    Ruf S; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 9267575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of the effects produced by headgear and pendulum appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Angelieri F; de Almeida RR; Janson G; Castanha Henriques JF; Pinzan A
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):572-9. PubMed ID: 19054813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Treatment effects of the light-force chincup.
    Barrett AAF; Baccetti T; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Oct; 138(4):468-476. PubMed ID: 20889053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of changes in the vertical facial dimension with different anchorage systems in extraction and non-extraction subjects treated by Begg fixed appliances: a retrospective study.
    Alkumru P; Erdem D; Altug-Atac AT
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):508-16. PubMed ID: 17974541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of a fixed magnetic appliance on the dentofacial complex.
    Kalra V; Burstone CJ; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Jun; 95(6):467-78. PubMed ID: 2729196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Treatment strategies for patients with hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 malocclusion: is vertical dimension affected?
    Gkantidis N; Halazonetis DJ; Alexandropoulos E; Haralabakis NB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 21889079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Early treatment of vertical skeletal dysplasia: the hyperdivergent phenotype.
    Sankey WL; Buschang PH; English J; Owen AH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Sep; 118(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 10982934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of orthodontic treatment on mandibular rotation and displacement in Angle Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Phan XL; Schneider BJ; Sadowsky C; BeGole EA
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 15132443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dentoskeletal effects of the fast-back molar distalizer followed by fixed appliances.
    Buongiorno M; Iacopetti F; Beretta M; Lanteri C; Defraia E
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Nov; 13(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 23260532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Karacay S; Akin E; Olmez H; Gurton AU; Sagdic D
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):666-72. PubMed ID: 16808575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Class II mechanics and overbite].
    Lodter C; Laverhne P; Arnaud C
    Orthod Fr; 2000 Sep; 71(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 11039278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion.
    de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Almeida MR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):833-42. PubMed ID: 19962606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 1. Hard tissue changes.
    Gill DS; Lee RT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):465-72; quiz 517. PubMed ID: 15821691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods.
    Bolla E; Muratore F; Carano A; Bowman SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of posttreatment changes in Class II Division 1 patients after nonextraction orthodontic treatment: cephalometric and model analysis.
    Ciger S; Aksu M; Germeç D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Feb; 127(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 15750542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Treatment effects of a modified quad-helix in patients with dentoskeletal open bites.
    Cozza P; Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):734-9. PubMed ID: 16769491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.