149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29510434)
1. Fast and Furious (?).
Heinemann MK
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Mar; 66(2):125. PubMed ID: 29510434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: A comprehensive guide for peer reviewers.
Brown LM; David EA; Karamlou T; Nason KS
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Jun; 153(6):1609-1614. PubMed ID: 28526112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Five Modes of Sudden Death.
Heinemann MK
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Jun; 66(4):277. PubMed ID: 29860717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Standards in the face of uncertainty--peer review is flawed and under-researched, but the best we have.
Mertens S; Baethge C
Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2012 Dec; 109(51-52):900-2. PubMed ID: 23372614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Meaningful peer review is integral to quality science and should provide benefits to the authors and reviewers alike.
Carrell DT; Rajpert-De Meyts E
Andrology; 2013 Jul; 1(4):531-2. PubMed ID: 23785017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. What happens to your submission at Australasian Journal on Ageing?
Parkinson L; Sims J
Australas J Ageing; 2017 Jun; 36(2):87-88. PubMed ID: 28635096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Peer Review in Transplantation.
Hutchinson JA
Transplantation; 2015 Sep; 99(9):1746-8. PubMed ID: 26308410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. European Urology: serving our readership through systematic peer review, use of reporting standards, and encouragement of postpublication review.
Catto JW; Cooperberg MR; Cornu JN; Gratzke C; Novara G; Shariat SF; Vickers A
Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):188-90. PubMed ID: 25175422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. So you want to publish your research in the Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis?
Greaves M
J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Mar; 15(3):405-410. PubMed ID: 27966273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A thank you note from the editor-in-chief.
Farrell GC
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Jan; 27(1):10. PubMed ID: 22188026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Independence Day.
Heinemann MK
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Mar; 65(2):73. PubMed ID: 28282657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Peer review in Clinical Pharmacology using the 8-D Assessment.
Woodcock BG
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2017 Mar; 55(3):201-200. PubMed ID: 28218890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A review of peer review by peers.
Heinemann MK
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Dec; 61(8):649-50. PubMed ID: 24323666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer review and the nursing literature.
Dougherty MC
Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):73. PubMed ID: 19289927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Financial disclosure of reviewers.
Parameswaran K
Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2003 Oct; 168(8):1010; author reply 1010. PubMed ID: 14555459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientific writing: the process and the pitfalls.
Byard RW
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2013 Sep; 9(3):285-6. PubMed ID: 23832426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. How to review a paper for Heart.
Otto CM
Heart; 2015 Jan; 101(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 25502328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Upgrading our instructions for authors.
Schriger DL; Wears RL; Cooper RJ; Callaham ML
Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):565-7. PubMed ID: 12658258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Restoring integrity to the scientific literature: lowering the bar to raise our standards.
Gordon SE
J Gen Physiol; 2014 Dec; 144(6):495-7. PubMed ID: 25422501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Update on the Manuscript Peer Review Process.
Elmore SA
Toxicol Pathol; 2017 Dec; 45(8):1028-1031. PubMed ID: 29145784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
