1355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29510632)
1. Impact of cesarean section in a private health service in Brazil: indications and neonatal morbidity and mortality rates.
Almeida MA; Araujo Júnior E; Camano L; Peixoto AB; Martins WP; Mattar R
Ceska Gynekol; 2018; 83(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 29510632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of obstetrical interventions in women with vaginal and cesarean section delivered: cross-sectional study in a reference tertiary center in the Northeast of Brazil.
Medeiros MQ; Lima PHM; Augusto CLC; Viana BJA; Pinheiro BAK; Peixoto AB; Araujo Júnior E; Carvalho CFH
Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(3):201-207. PubMed ID: 31324110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Route of breech delivery and maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Sanchez-Ramos L; Wells TL; Adair CD; Arcelin G; Kaunitz AM; Wells DS
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2001 Apr; 73(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 11336715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cesarean section with relative indications versus spontaneous vaginal delivery: short-term outcomes of maternofetal health.
Arikan I; Barut A; Harma M; Harma IM; Gezer S; Ulubasoglu H
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2012; 39(3):288-92. PubMed ID: 23157026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pregnancy outcomes by mode of delivery among breech births.
Demirci O; Tuğrul AS; Turgut A; Ceylan S; Eren S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Feb; 285(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 21735191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Previous cesarean section and the risk of postpartum maternal complications and adverse neonatal outcomes in future pregnancies.
Galyean AM; Lagrew DC; Bush MC; Kurtzman JT
J Perinatol; 2009 Nov; 29(11):726-30. PubMed ID: 19626026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women.
Herstad L; Klungsøyr K; Skjærven R; Tanbo T; Forsén L; Åbyholm T; Vangen S
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16():230. PubMed ID: 27535233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maternal and fetal mortality and complications associated with cesarean section deliveries in teaching hospitals in Asia.
Chongsuvivatwong V; Bachtiar H; Chowdhury ME; Fernando S; Suwanrath C; Kor-Anantakul O; Tuan le A; Lim A; Lumbiganon P; Manandhar B; Muchtar M; Nahar L; Hieu NT; Fang PX; Prasertcharoensuk W; Radnaabarzar E; Sibuea D; Than KK; Tharnpaisan P; Thach TS; Rowe P
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Feb; 36(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 20178526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Association between hospital-level obstetric quality indicators and maternal and neonatal morbidity.
Howell EA; Zeitlin J; Hebert PL; Balbierz A; Egorova N
JAMA; 2014 Oct; 312(15):1531-41. PubMed ID: 25321908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Severe maternal and neonatal morbidity after attempted operative vaginal delivery.
Panelli DM; Leonard SA; Joudi N; Girsen AI; Judy AE; El-Sayed YY; Gilbert WM; Lyell DJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 May; 3(3):100339. PubMed ID: 33631384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incidence and determinants of neonatal morbidity after elective caesarean section at the national referral hospital in Kampala, Uganda.
Nakimuli A; Nakubulwa S; Kakaire O; Osinde MO; Mbalinda SN; Nabirye RC; Kakande N; Kaye DK
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Oct; 8():624. PubMed ID: 26518174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Investigation on the approach of delivery after previous cesarean section of Xinjiang Uyghur women].
Ding X; Aimainilezi A; Jin Y; Abudula W; Yin C
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 49(10):736-40. PubMed ID: 25537243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Increasing use of cesarean section, even in developing countries].
Onsrud L; Onsrud M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1996 Jan; 116(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 8553342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Appropriate delivery mode and timing of termination for pregnancy with low birth weight infants].
Chen Y; Zou L; Li G; Ruan Y; Wang X; Zhang W
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 May; 50(5):323-8. PubMed ID: 26311449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Analysis of the maternal and fetal adverse outcomes of 154 pregnant women with cesarean section in the second stage of labor].
Qu L; Yang Y; Yin Y; Yin TT; Zhang X; Zhou X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Dec; 58(12):888-895. PubMed ID: 38123194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality among term singletons following midcavity operative vaginal delivery versus caesarean delivery.
Muraca GM; Skoll A; Lisonkova S; Sabr Y; Brant R; Cundiff GW; Joseph KS
BJOG; 2018 May; 125(6):693-702. PubMed ID: 28692173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted vaginal compared with planned cesarean delivery in triplet gestations.
Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):493.e1-6. PubMed ID: 27166014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality after attempted operative vaginal delivery at midpelvic station.
Muraca GM; Sabr Y; Lisonkova S; Skoll A; Brant R; Cundiff GW; Joseph KS
CMAJ; 2017 Jun; 189(22):E764-E772. PubMed ID: 28584040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breech Presentation: Vaginal Versus Cesarean Delivery, Which Intervention Leads to the Best Outcomes?
Fonseca A; Silva R; Rato I; Neves AR; Peixoto C; Ferraz Z; Ramalho I; Carocha A; Félix N; Valdoleiros S; Galvão A; Gonçalves D; Curado J; Palma MJ; Antunes IL; Clode N; Graça LM
Acta Med Port; 2017 Jun; 30(6):479-484. PubMed ID: 28898615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
