These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29510656)

  • 21. Demographic change and the 2016 presidential election.
    Maggio C
    Soc Sci Res; 2021 Mar; 95():102459. PubMed ID: 33653583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sexual Disgust Trumps Pathogen Disgust in Predicting Voter Behavior During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Billingsley J; Lieberman D; Tybur JM
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918764170. PubMed ID: 29911419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Moved by Observing the Love of Others: Kama Muta Evoked Through Media Fosters Humanization of Out-Groups.
    Blomster Lyshol JK; Thomsen L; Seibt B
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1240. PubMed ID: 32670144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Changes in subjective well-being following the U.S. Presidential election of 2016.
    Lench HC; Levine LJ; Perez KA; Carpenter ZK; Carlson SJ; Tibbett T
    Emotion; 2019 Feb; 19(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 29494200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Speaking two "Languages" in America: A semantic space analysis of how presidential candidates and their supporters represent abstract political concepts differently.
    Li P; Schloss B; Follmer DJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Oct; 49(5):1668-1685. PubMed ID: 28718087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Guns In Political Advertising Over Four US Election Cycles, 2012-18.
    Barry CL; Bandara S; Fowler EF; Baum L; Gollust SE; Niederdeppe J; Hendricks AK
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2020 Feb; 39(2):327-333. PubMed ID: 32011931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Issues Relevant to Population Health in Political Advertising in the United States, 2011-2012 and 2015-2016.
    Fowler EF; Baum LM; Jesch E; Haddad D; Reyes C; Gollust SE; Niederdeppe J
    Milbank Q; 2019 Dec; 97(4):1062-1107. PubMed ID: 31650628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Voting Intention and Choices: Are Voters Always Rational and Deliberative?
    Lee IC; Chen EE; Tsai CH; Yen NS; Chen AL; Lin WC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148643. PubMed ID: 26886266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dimensions of pathological narcissism and intention to vote for Donald Trump.
    Yalch MM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249892. PubMed ID: 33857206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The 2000 election and the future of U.S. politics.
    Teixeira R
    Int J Health Serv; 2001; 31(4):881-7. PubMed ID: 11809015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Motivated reasoning: Election integrity beliefs, outcome acceptance, and polarization before, during, and after the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Vail KE; Harvell-Bowman L; Lockett M; Pyszczynski T; Gilmore G
    Motiv Emot; 2023; 47(2):177-192. PubMed ID: 36188156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Single-Target Implicit Association Tests (ST-IAT) Predict Voting Behavior of Decided and Undecided Voters in Swiss Referendums.
    Raccuia L
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0163872. PubMed ID: 27732617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predicted and experienced affective responses to the outcome of the 2008 U.S. presidential election.
    Kitchens MB; Corser GC; Gohm CL; VonWaldner KL; Foreman EL
    Psychol Rep; 2010 Dec; 107(3):837-46. PubMed ID: 21323142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The regulation of recurrent negative emotion in the aftermath of a lost election.
    Mehta A; Formanowicz M; Uusberg A; Uusberg H; Gross JJ; Suri G
    Cogn Emot; 2020 Jun; 34(4):848-857. PubMed ID: 31701806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Neural bases of motivated reasoning: an FMRI study of emotional constraints on partisan political judgment in the 2004 U.S. Presidential election.
    Westen D; Blagov PS; Harenski K; Kilts C; Hamann S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 18(11):1947-58. PubMed ID: 17069484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Social influence in televised election debates: a potential distortion of democracy.
    Davis CJ; Bowers JS; Memon A
    PLoS One; 2011 Mar; 6(3):e18154. PubMed ID: 21479191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Changes in Mental Health Following the 2016 Presidential Election.
    Yan BW; Hsia RY; Yeung V; Sloan FA
    J Gen Intern Med; 2021 Jan; 36(1):170-177. PubMed ID: 33128680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Investigating the Effect of Use and Social Cues in Food Advertisements on Attention, Feelings of Social Support, and Purchase Intention.
    Liu J; Bailey RL
    Health Commun; 2020 Nov; 35(13):1614-1622. PubMed ID: 31407593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Psychological Profile of the Alt-Right.
    Forscher PS; Kteily NS
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 Jan; 15(1):90-116. PubMed ID: 31747343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Swaying the Public? Impacts of Election Forecast Visualizations on Emotion, Trust, and Intention in the 2022 U.S. Midterms.
    Yang F; Cai M; Mortenson C; Fakhari H; Lokmanoglu AD; Hullman J; Franconeri S; Diakopoulos N; Nisbet EC; Kay M
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2024 Jan; 30(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 37930916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.