These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29511855)

  • 1. Shifting stream planform state decreases stream productivity yet increases riparian animal production.
    Venarsky MP; Walters DM; Hall RO; Livers B; Wohl E
    Oecologia; 2018 May; 187(1):167-180. PubMed ID: 29511855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spiders and subsidies: results from the riparian zone of a coastal temperate rainforest.
    Marczak LB; Richardson JS
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Jul; 76(4):687-94. PubMed ID: 17584374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stream thermal heterogeneity prolongs aquatic-terrestrial subsidy and enhances riparian spider growth.
    Uno H
    Ecology; 2016 Oct; 97(10):2547-2553. PubMed ID: 27859130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Species replacement by a nonnative salmonid alters ecosystem function by reducing prey subsidies that support riparian spiders.
    Benjamin JR; Fausch KD; Baxter CV
    Oecologia; 2011 Oct; 167(2):503-12. PubMed ID: 21688160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increasing donor ecosystem productivity decreases terrestrial consumer reliance on a stream resource subsidy.
    Davis JM; Rosemond AD; Small GE
    Oecologia; 2011 Nov; 167(3):821-34. PubMed ID: 21647783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do agricultural pesticides in streams influence riparian spiders?
    Graf N; Battes KP; Cimpean M; Dittrich P; Entling MH; Link M; Scharmüller A; Schreiner VC; Szöcs E; Schäfer RB
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Apr; 660():126-135. PubMed ID: 30639710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of emergent aquatic insects on bat foraging in a riparian forest.
    Fukui D; Murakami M; Nakano S; Aoi T
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 Nov; 75(6):1252-8. PubMed ID: 17032357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stream invertebrate productivity linked to forest subsidies: 37 stream-years of reference and experimental data.
    Wallace JB; Eggert SL; Meyer JL; Webster JR
    Ecology; 2015 May; 96(5):1213-28. PubMed ID: 26236836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Carbon and nitrogen transfer from a desert stream to riparian predators.
    Sanzone DM; Meyer JL; Marti E; Gardiner EP; Tank JL; Grimm NB
    Oecologia; 2003 Jan; 134(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 12647165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Macroinvertebrate communities in agriculturally impacted southern Illinois streams: patterns with riparian vegetation, water quality, and in-stream habitat quality.
    Stone ML; Whiles MR; Webber JA; Williard KW; Reeve JD
    J Environ Qual; 2005; 34(3):907-17. PubMed ID: 15843654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Flux of aquatic insect productivity to land: comparison of lentic and lotic ecosystems.
    Gratton C; Vander Zanden MJ
    Ecology; 2009 Oct; 90(10):2689-99. PubMed ID: 19886479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mature and old-growth riparian forests: structure, dynamics, and effects on Adirondack stream habitats.
    Keeton WS; Kraft CE; Warren DR
    Ecol Appl; 2007 Apr; 17(3):852-68. PubMed ID: 17494402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response to basal resources by stream macroinvertebrates is shaped by watershed urbanization, riparian canopy cover, and season.
    Alberts JM; Fritz KM; Buffam I
    Freshw Sci; 2018 Sep; 37(3):640-652. PubMed ID: 31428513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linking stream flow and groundwater to avian habitat in a desert riparian system.
    Merritt DM; Bateman HL
    Ecol Appl; 2012 Oct; 22(7):1973-88. PubMed ID: 23210313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the effectiveness of a constructed Arctic stream using multiple biological attributes.
    Jones NE; Scrimgeour GJ; Tonn WM
    Environ Manage; 2008 Dec; 42(6):1064-76. PubMed ID: 18839240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flooding impacts on responses of a riparian consumer to cross-ecosystem subsidies.
    Greenwood MJ; McIntosh AR
    Ecology; 2008 Jun; 89(6):1489-96. PubMed ID: 18589513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-ecosystem impacts of stream pollution reduce resource and contaminant flux to riparian food webs.
    Kraus JM; Schmidt TS; Walters DM; Wanty RB; Zuellig RE; Wolf RE
    Ecol Appl; 2014 Mar; 24(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 24689137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding stream bank erosion and deposition in Iowa, USA: A seven year study along streams in different regions with different riparian land-uses.
    Zaimes GΝ; Tamparopoulos AE; Tufekcioglu M; Schultz RC
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Jun; 287():112352. PubMed ID: 33743416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Local Geomorphology as a Determinant of Macrofaunal Production in a Mountain Stream.
    Huryn AD; Wallace JB
    Ecology; 1987 Dec; 68(6):1932-1942. PubMed ID: 29357177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Riparian shading and groundwater enhance growth potential for smallmouth bass in Ozark streams.
    Whitledge GW; Rabeni CF; Annis G; Sowa SP
    Ecol Appl; 2006 Aug; 16(4):1461-73. PubMed ID: 16937811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.