These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
516 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29511877)
41. Single-stage immediate breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: Experience gained and lessons learnt from patient reported outcome measures. Apte A; Walsh M; Chandrasekharan S; Chakravorty A Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jan; 42(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 26651226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison of sterile versus nonsterile acellular dermal matrices for breast reconstruction. Buseman J; Wong L; Kemper P; Hill JL; Nimtz J; Rinker B; Vasconez HC Ann Plast Surg; 2013 May; 70(5):497-9. PubMed ID: 23542856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix-Based Breast Reconstruction in Previously Irradiated Breasts: Complications and Outcomes From a Single-Center Experience. Lisa A; Carbonaro R; Bottoni M; Ostapenko E; Rietjens M Ann Plast Surg; 2023 Dec; 91(6):686-692. PubMed ID: 37624913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. ADM-Assisted Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction in Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy Setting: Long-Term Results. Polotto S; Pedrazzi G; Bergamini M; D'Abbiero N; Cattelani L Clin Breast Cancer; 2023 Oct; 23(7):704-711. PubMed ID: 37479666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Acellular dermal matrix slings in tissue expander breast reconstruction: are there substantial benefits? Collis GN; TerKonda SP; Waldorf JC; Perdikis G Ann Plast Surg; 2012 May; 68(5):425-8. PubMed ID: 21825969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A Meta-analysis of Postoperative Complications of Tissue Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction Using Acellular Dermal Matrix. Zhao X; Wu X; Dong J; Liu Y; Zheng L; Zhang L Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Dec; 39(6):892-901. PubMed ID: 26377821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. Reitsamer R; Peintinger F J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 25455288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Utility of acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction in the setting of radiation: a comparative analysis. Seth AK; Hirsch EM; Fine NA; Kim JYS Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Oct; 130(4):750-758. PubMed ID: 23018687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Does acellular dermal matrix really improve aesthetic outcome in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction? Ibrahim AM; Koolen PG; Ganor O; Markarian MK; Tobias AM; Lee BT; Lin SJ; Mureau MA Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Jun; 39(3):359-68. PubMed ID: 25894022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Options in Acellular Dermal Matrix-Device Assembly. Sigalove S Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):39S-42S. PubMed ID: 29166346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Postsurgical Ultrasound Evaluation of Patients with Prosthesis in Acellular Dermal Matrix: Results from Monocentric Experience. Laura B; Alice C; Silvia G; Cristiana B; Giuseppe DT; Antonio A; Giuseppina OM Int J Surg Oncol; 2019; 2019():7437324. PubMed ID: 31316828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Factors affecting complications in radiated breast reconstruction. Pestana IA; Campbell DC; Bharti G; Thompson JT Ann Plast Surg; 2013 May; 70(5):542-5. PubMed ID: 23542851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Human acellular dermis versus no acellular dermis in tissue expansion breast reconstruction. Parks JW; Hammond SE; Walsh WA; Adams RL; Chandler RG; Luce EA Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Oct; 130(4):739-746. PubMed ID: 23018685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Updated Evidence of Acellular Dermal Matrix Use for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis. Lee KT; Mun GH Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):600-10. PubMed ID: 26438439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Immediate Two-Stage Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction Failure: Radiation Is Not the Only Culprit. Lam TC; Borotkanics R; Hsieh F; Salinas J; Boyages J Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Jun; 141(6):1315-1324. PubMed ID: 29750759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [The impact of acellular dermal matrix on complications of breast reconstruction using tissue expander/implant: a meta-analysis]. Dong J; Wu XW; Tian FX Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 29(5):356-61. PubMed ID: 24409778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Cost analysis of postmastectomy reconstruction: A comparison of two staged implant reconstruction using tissue expander and acellular dermal matrix with abdominal-based perforator free flaps. Tran BNN; Fadayomi A; Lin SJ; Singhal D; Lee BT J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 116(4):439-447. PubMed ID: 28591940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Trends in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction types at a breast cancer tertiary referral centre before and after introduction of acellular dermal matrices. Kankam HKN; Hourston GJM; Fopp LJ; Benson JR; Benyon SL; Irwin MS; Agrawal A; Forouhi P; Malata CM J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Jan; 71(1):21-27. PubMed ID: 28917935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A large-volume academic center retrospective audit of the temporal evolution of immediate breast reconstruction protocols and the effect on breast prosthetic infection. Manahan MA; McNichols CH; Bello RJ; Giuliano K; Xie S; von Guionneau N; Ahn J; Rosson GD; Hui-Chou HG J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Feb; 72(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 30553779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]