These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29512059)
1. Patient-Specific Cardiovascular Computational Modeling: Diversity of Personalization and Challenges. Gray RA; Pathmanathan P J Cardiovasc Transl Res; 2018 Apr; 11(2):80-88. PubMed ID: 29512059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Use of Computational Modeling and Simulation to Create Virtual Patients: Application to Cardiac Pacing and Defibrillation Systems. Himes A J Cardiovasc Transl Res; 2018 Apr; 11(2):89-91. PubMed ID: 29305798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Applications of Patient-Specific Models: The Case for a Simple Approach. Holmes JW; Lumens J J Cardiovasc Transl Res; 2018 Apr; 11(2):71-79. PubMed ID: 29453747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computational Modeling for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. Lee AWC; Costa CM; Strocchi M; Rinaldi CA; Niederer SA J Cardiovasc Transl Res; 2018 Apr; 11(2):92-108. PubMed ID: 29327314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient-Specific Modeling of Hemodynamics: Supporting Surgical Planning in a Fontan Circulation Correction. van Bakel TMJ; Lau KD; Hirsch-Romano J; Trimarchi S; Dorfman AL; Figueroa CA J Cardiovasc Transl Res; 2018 Apr; 11(2):145-155. PubMed ID: 29313269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recent advances in the application of computational mechanics to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Del Alamo JC; Marsden AL; Lasheras JC Rev Esp Cardiol; 2009 Jul; 62(7):781-805. PubMed ID: 19709514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient-specific modeling of left ventricular electromechanics as a driver for haemodynamic analysis. Augustin CM; Crozier A; Neic A; Prassl AJ; Karabelas E; Ferreira da Silva T; Fernandes JF; Campos F; Kuehne T; Plank G Europace; 2016 Dec; 18(suppl 4):iv121-iv129. PubMed ID: 28011839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Teaching cardiovascular medicine to machines. Lamata P Cardiovasc Res; 2018 Jul; 114(8):e62-e64. PubMed ID: 29850780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of an Experimental and Digital Cardiovascular Arterial Model for Transient Hemodynamic and Postural Change Studies: "A Preliminary Framework Analysis". Hewlin RL; Kizito JP Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Mar; 9(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 29124548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An interactive simulation tool for patient-specific clinical decision support in single-ventricle physiology. Conover T; Hlavacek AM; Migliavacca F; Kung E; Dorfman A; Figliola RS; Hsia TY; J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Feb; 155(2):712-721. PubMed ID: 29061467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Fluid Dynamics Variations Between Chimney and Fenestrated Endografts for Pararenal Aneurysms Repair: A Patient Specific Computational Study as Motivation for Clinical Decision-Making. Moulakakis KG; Kakisis J; Gonidaki E; Lazaris AM; Tsangaris S; Geroulakos G; Manopoulos C Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2019 Oct; 53(7):572-582. PubMed ID: 31382837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mathematics and Cardiovascular Interventions: Role of the Finite Element Modeling in Clinical Decision Making. Zuin M; Rigatelli G; Faggian G; Roncon L JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 9(5):507-8. PubMed ID: 26965944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Decision Tools to Improve Personalized Care in Cardiovascular Disease: Moving the Art of Medicine Toward Science. Yeh RW; Kramer DB Circulation; 2017 Mar; 135(12):1097-1100. PubMed ID: 28320801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Computational fluid dynamics: a primer for congenital heart disease clinicians. Gerrah R; Haller SJ Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2020 Oct; 28(8):520-532. PubMed ID: 32878458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]