BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29512644)

  • 1. [Ligand-Induced Reassembly of GroEL/ES Chaperone In Vitro: Visualization by Electron Microscopy].
    Ryabova NA; Selivanova OM; Semisotnov GV
    Mol Biol (Mosk); 2018; 52(1):120-124. PubMed ID: 29512644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Limited Trypsinolysis of GroES: The Effect on the Interaction with GroEL and Assembly In Vitro].
    Marchenkov VV; Kotova NV; Muranova TA; Semisotnov GV
    Mol Biol (Mosk); 2018; 52(1):82-87. PubMed ID: 29512639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Molecular chaperone GroEL/ES: unfolding and refolding processes.
    Ryabova NA; Marchenkov VV; Marchenkova SY; Kotova NV; Semisotnov GV
    Biochemistry (Mosc); 2013 Dec; 78(13):1405-14. PubMed ID: 24490731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional significance of symmetrical versus asymmetrical GroEL-GroES chaperonin complexes.
    Engel A; Hayer-Hartl MK; Goldie KN; Pfeifer G; Hegerl R; Müller S; da Silva AC; Baumeister W; Hartl FU
    Science; 1995 Aug; 269(5225):832-6. PubMed ID: 7638600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. TEM and STEM-EDS evaluation of metal nanoparticle encapsulation in GroEL/GroES complexes according to the reaction mechanism of chaperonin.
    Yoda H; Koike-Takeshita A
    Microscopy (Oxf); 2021 Jun; 70(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 33173948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. GroEL and the GroEL-GroES Complex.
    Ishii N
    Subcell Biochem; 2017; 83():483-504. PubMed ID: 28271487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An expanded protein folding cage in the GroEL-gp31 complex.
    Clare DK; Bakkes PJ; van Heerikhuizen H; van der Vies SM; Saibil HR
    J Mol Biol; 2006 May; 358(3):905-11. PubMed ID: 16549073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Football- and bullet-shaped GroEL-GroES complexes coexist during the reaction cycle.
    Sameshima T; Ueno T; Iizuka R; Ishii N; Terada N; Okabe K; Funatsu T
    J Biol Chem; 2008 Aug; 283(35):23765-73. PubMed ID: 18567585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revisiting the GroEL-GroES reaction cycle via the symmetric intermediate implied by novel aspects of the GroEL(D398A) mutant.
    Koike-Takeshita A; Yoshida M; Taguchi H
    J Biol Chem; 2008 Aug; 283(35):23774-81. PubMed ID: 18567584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Folding with and without encapsulation by cis- and trans-only GroEL-GroES complexes.
    Farr GW; Fenton WA; Chaudhuri TK; Clare DK; Saibil HR; Horwich AL
    EMBO J; 2003 Jul; 22(13):3220-30. PubMed ID: 12839985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transmission electron microscopy of GroEL, GroES, and the symmetrical GroEL/ES complex.
    Harris JR; Plückthun A; Zahn R
    J Struct Biol; 1994; 112(3):216-30. PubMed ID: 7986648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effective ATPase activity and moderate chaperonin-cochaperonin interaction are important for the functional single-ring chaperonin system.
    Illingworth M; Salisbury J; Li W; Lin D; Chen L
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2015 Oct; 466(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 26271593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repetitive protein unfolding by the trans ring of the GroEL-GroES chaperonin complex stimulates folding.
    Lin Z; Puchalla J; Shoup D; Rye HS
    J Biol Chem; 2013 Oct; 288(43):30944-55. PubMed ID: 24022487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chaperonin-Assisted Protein Folding: Relative Population of Asymmetric and Symmetric GroEL:GroES Complexes.
    Haldar S; Gupta AJ; Yan X; Miličić G; Hartl FU; Hayer-Hartl M
    J Mol Biol; 2015 Jun; 427(12):2244-55. PubMed ID: 25912285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Productive folding of a tethered protein in the chaperonin GroEL-GroES cage.
    Motojima F; Yoshida M
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2015 Oct; 466(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 26325470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Creating the Functional Single-Ring GroEL-GroES Chaperonin Systems via Modulating GroEL-GroES Interaction.
    Illingworth M; Ellis H; Chen L
    Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):9710. PubMed ID: 28852160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nucleotide-dependent complex formation between the Escherichia coli chaperonins GroEL and GroES studied under equilibrium conditions.
    Behlke J; Ristau O; Schönfeld HJ
    Biochemistry; 1997 Apr; 36(17):5149-56. PubMed ID: 9136876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Location and flexibility of the unique C-terminal tail of Aquifex aeolicus co-chaperonin protein 10 as derived by cryo-electron microscopy and biophysical techniques.
    Chen DH; Luke K; Zhang J; Chiu W; Wittung-Stafshede P
    J Mol Biol; 2008 Sep; 381(3):707-17. PubMed ID: 18588898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The C-terminal tails of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL stimulate protein folding by directly altering the conformation of a substrate protein.
    Weaver J; Rye HS
    J Biol Chem; 2014 Aug; 289(33):23219-23232. PubMed ID: 24970895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Crystal structure of a symmetric football-shaped GroEL:GroES2-ATP14 complex determined at 3.8Å reveals rearrangement between two GroEL rings.
    Koike-Takeshita A; Arakawa T; Taguchi H; Shimamura T
    J Mol Biol; 2014 Oct; 426(21):3634-41. PubMed ID: 25174333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.