BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29512644)

  • 21. Reaction Cycle of Chaperonin GroEL via Symmetric "Football" Intermediate.
    Taguchi H
    J Mol Biol; 2015 Sep; 427(18):2912-8. PubMed ID: 25900372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On the role of symmetrical and asymmetrical chaperonin complexes in assisted protein folding.
    Hayer-Hartl MK; Ewalt KL; Hartl FU
    Biol Chem; 1999 May; 380(5):531-40. PubMed ID: 10384959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. GroEL-assisted protein folding: does it occur within the chaperonin inner cavity?
    Marchenkov VV; Semisotnov GV
    Int J Mol Sci; 2009 May; 10(5):2066-2083. PubMed ID: 19564940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How GroES regulates binding of nonnative protein to GroEL.
    Sparrer H; Buchner J
    J Biol Chem; 1997 May; 272(22):14080-6. PubMed ID: 9162032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Symmetric GroEL-GroES complexes can contain substrate simultaneously in both GroEL rings.
    Llorca O; Marco S; Carrascosa JL; Valpuesta JM
    FEBS Lett; 1997 Mar; 405(2):195-9. PubMed ID: 9089290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Protein folding assisted by the GroEL/GroES chaperonin system.
    Martin J
    Biochemistry (Mosc); 1998 Apr; 63(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 9556520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Characterisation of mutations in GroES that allow GroEL to function as a single ring.
    Liu H; Kovács E; Lund PA
    FEBS Lett; 2009 Jul; 583(14):2365-71. PubMed ID: 19545569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Structure and conformational cycle of a bacteriophage-encoded chaperonin.
    Bracher A; Paul SS; Wang H; Wischnewski N; Hartl FU; Hayer-Hartl M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0230090. PubMed ID: 32339190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Purification and characterization of Chromatium vinosum GroEL and GroES proteins overexpressed in Escherichia coli cells lacking the endogenous groESL operon.
    Dionisi HM; Viale AM
    Protein Expr Purif; 1998 Nov; 14(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 9790891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of refolding activities between nanogel artificial chaperone and GroEL systems.
    Asayama W; Sawada S; Taguchi H; Akiyoshi K
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2008 Apr; 42(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 18179818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Unfolded DapA forms aggregates when diluted into free solution, confounding comparison with folding by the GroEL/GroES chaperonin system.
    Ambrose A; Fenton W; Mason DJ; Chapman E; Horwich AL
    FEBS Lett; 2015 Feb; 589(4):497-499. PubMed ID: 25601566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Gly192 at hinge 2 site in the chaperonin GroEL plays a pivotal role in the dynamic apical domain movement that leads to GroES binding and efficient encapsulation of substrate proteins.
    Machida K; Fujiwara R; Tanaka T; Sakane I; Hongo K; Mizobata T; Kawata Y
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2009 Sep; 1794(9):1344-54. PubMed ID: 19130907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL.
    Rye HS; Burston SG; Fenton WA; Beechem JM; Xu Z; Sigler PB; Horwich AL
    Nature; 1997 Aug; 388(6644):792-8. PubMed ID: 9285593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Active cage mechanism of chaperonin-assisted protein folding demonstrated at single-molecule level.
    Gupta AJ; Haldar S; Miličić G; Hartl FU; Hayer-Hartl M
    J Mol Biol; 2014 Jul; 426(15):2739-54. PubMed ID: 24816391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A dynamic model of long-range conformational adaptations triggered by nucleotide binding in GroEL-GroES.
    Skjaerven L; Muga A; Reuter N; Martinez A
    Proteins; 2012 Oct; 80(10):2333-46. PubMed ID: 22576372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. High hydrostatic pressure can probe the effects of functionally related ligands on the quaternary structures of the chaperonins GroEL and GroES.
    Panda M; Ybarra J; Horowitz PM
    J Biol Chem; 2001 Mar; 276(9):6253-9. PubMed ID: 11085994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Substrate protein dependence of GroEL-GroES interaction cycle revealed by high-speed atomic force microscopy imaging.
    Noshiro D; Ando T
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2018 Jun; 373(1749):. PubMed ID: 29735734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Do chaperonins boost protein yields by accelerating folding or preventing aggregation?
    Jewett AI; Shea JE
    Biophys J; 2008 Apr; 94(8):2987-93. PubMed ID: 18192377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Anisotropic intersubunit and inter-ring interactions revealed in the native bullet-shaped chaperonin complex from Thermus thermophilus.
    Ishii N; Sato T
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2013 Apr; 1830(4):2907-16. PubMed ID: 23313842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. From minichaperone to GroEL 2: importance of avidity of the multisite ring structure.
    Chatellier J; Hill F; Fersht AR
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Dec; 304(5):883-96. PubMed ID: 11124034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.