These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29513021)

  • 1. Comparison of early treatment outcomes rendered in three different types of malocclusions.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Kang HK; Dhawan A; Al-Qawasmi R; Pacheco RR
    Angle Orthod; 2018 May; 88(3):253-258. PubMed ID: 29513021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index.
    Birkeland K; Furevik J; Bøe OE; Wisth PJ
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Jun; 19(3):279-88. PubMed ID: 9239958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Comparison of Three Orthodontic Treatment Indices with Regard to Angle Classification.
    Kaygisiz E; Uzuner FD; Taner L
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 26950821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An appraisal of the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index and a suggested new weighting system.
    Hamdan AM; Rock WP
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Apr; 21(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 10327742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficiency and Duration of Orthodontic/Orthognathic Surgery Treatment.
    Dehghani M; Fazeli F; Sattarzadeh AP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 28(8):1997-2000. PubMed ID: 28968333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of peer assessment ratings (PAR) from 1-phase and 2-phase treatment protocols for Class II malocclusions.
    King GJ; McGorray SP; Wheeler TT; Dolce C; Taylor M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 May; 123(5):489-96. PubMed ID: 12750665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Another way of looking at treatment stability.
    Zinad K; Schols AM; Schols JG
    Angle Orthod; 2016 Sep; 86(5):721-6. PubMed ID: 26918314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Malocclusion severity in Asian men in relation to malocclusion type and orthodontic treatment need.
    Soh J; Sandham A; Chan YH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):648-52. PubMed ID: 16286213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficiency of class I and class II malocclusion treatment with four premolar extractions.
    Janson G; Nakamura A; Barros SE; Bombonatti R; Chiqueto K
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2014; 22(6):522-7. PubMed ID: 24918660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is the benefit of early orthodontic treatment worth the burden?
    DeWood C; Grimes M; Vaden JL
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2006; 86(2):12-7. PubMed ID: 16895005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Space planning sensitivity and specificity: Royal London Space Planning and Korkhaus Analyses.
    Dause R; Cobourne M; McDonald F
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 20575199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Class II Angle malocclusions frequency and comparison with malocclusions].
    Romanec C; Dorobăţ V
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2010; 114(4):1188-93. PubMed ID: 21500478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early treatment outcome assessed by the Peer Assessment Rating index.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Kaczynski R; Shunock M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 May; 115(5):544-50. PubMed ID: 10229887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing changes in quality of life using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) in patients with different classifications of malocclusion during comprehensive orthodontic treatment.
    Zheng DH; Wang XX; Su YR; Zhao SY; Xu C; Kong C; Zhang J
    BMC Oral Health; 2015 Nov; 15():148. PubMed ID: 26589825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. RISK FACTORS AND PREDICTORS OF CROSSBITE AT CHILDREN.
    Zegan G; Dascalu CG; Mavru RB; Golovcencu L
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2015; 119(2):564-71. PubMed ID: 26204668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of early treatment on stability of occlusion in patients with Class II malocclusion.
    Pavlow SS; McGorray SP; Taylor MG; Dolce C; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 18249290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of phase 1 orthodontic treatment using the American Board of Orthodontics Discrepancy Index.
    Vasilakou N; Araujo EA; Kim KB; Oliver DR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Dec; 150(6):997-1004. PubMed ID: 27894549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The Bimzat skeletal activator in the treatment of Angle Class I, II and III malocclusions in the mixed dentition].
    Genone B
    Dent Cadmos; 1985 Dec; 53(20):17-25, 29-32, 35-9 passim. PubMed ID: 3869560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of treatment and posttreatment changes of protraction facemask treatment using the PAR index.
    Ngan P; Yiu C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Oct; 118(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 11029737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors associated with long-term patient satisfaction.
    Maia NG; Normando D; Maia FA; Ferreira MA; do Socorro Costa Feitosa Alves M
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Nov; 80(6):1155-8. PubMed ID: 20677969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.